Jeep Renegade vs Mazda CX-30 – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Comparing Icons: Jeep Renegade vs. Mazda CX-30

The SUV market continues to grow, attracting drivers with its promise of versatility, style, and performance. Today, we delve into a compelling comparison between two popular models in the compact SUV segment: the Jeep Renegade and the Mazda CX-30. Both vehicles are designed to meet diverse driving needs but bring their unique strengths to the road.

Performance and Power Delivery

Under the hood, the Jeep Renegade offers a choice between a Petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and a Plug-in Hybrid, delivering between 130 HP and 240 HP. Its power is channeled through either a dual-clutch automatic or an automatic gearbox, with front-wheel or all-wheel drive options. This flexibility offers a broad appeal depending on driving preferences. Acceleration is robust with a 0-100 km/h time between 9.7 and 7.1 seconds, showcasing its capability to handle a variety of terrains with confidence.

The Mazda CX-30, on the other hand, comes with a similarly innovative MHEV system. It offers power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 186 HP. Transmission options include both manual and automatic gearboxes, catering to a more hands-on driving experience for enthusiasts. The CX-30 matches the Renegade's torque at 240 Nm and records an acceleration time of 8.3 to 10.3 seconds. The Mazda also provides both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, ensuring steady delivery and engaging handling.

Fuel Efficiency and Sustainability

Fuel consumption for the Jeep Renegade ranges from a moderate 5.5 L/100km in its MHEV form to an impressive 2.1 L/100km in the plug-in hybrid variant, which also offers a 36 km electric-only range. This efficiency is complemented by its CO2 emissions, falling within the D and B efficiency classes.

The Mazda CX-30, while purely a petrol-driven vehicle, achieves a fuel consumption range between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. It maintains similar CO2 efficiency classifications at D and E, highlighting its commitment to reduced emissions without compromising the driving pleasure.

Design and Interior Comfort

The Jeep Renegade measures 4236 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and a height up to 1718 mm, providing a rugged and imposing road presence. It features a trunk capacity between 330 and 351 liters, ensuring ample cargo space for adventurous outings. Its interior is designed for comfort with five seats and practicality in mind.

In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is slightly more extended at 4395 mm in length and 1795 mm in width with a lower height of 1540 mm. This sleek design contributes to excellent aerodynamics and a sophisticated look. The trunk offers between 422 and 430 liters of space, proving slightly more accommodating for families and long journeys. Additionally, its interior incorporates advanced design elements that promote comfort and user engagement.

Verdict: Choosing the Ideal Compact SUV

Choosing between the Jeep Renegade and the Mazda CX-30 is no simple feat, as both vehicles bring distinct benefits to the table. The Renegade stands out for its hybrid options and off-road prowess, making it ideal for those seeking versatility and eco-friendliness. The CX-30 excels with its sleek design, engaging driving dynamics, and solid build, appealing to those who value style and efficiency.

Ultimately, the decision lies in what the driver values more—whether it's the adventure-ready flexibility of the Renegade or the refined performance of the CX-30, both SUVs are commendable choices in the compact SUV market.