VS

Ford Ranger vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Sammenlign ytelse, bagasjerom, forbruk og pris på et øyeblikk.
Finn ut hvilken bil som er det beste valget for deg – Ford Ranger eller Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Ford Ranger vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: A Battle of Utility vs. Luxury

When it comes to choosing a new vehicle, potential buyers often find themselves weighing the pros and cons of different models that serve distinct purposes. Today, we pit two popular models against each other: the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This comparison highlights the technical aspects and innovations that set these vehicles apart in the competitive automotive market.

Range Rover Evoque @ media.landrover.com

Power and Performance

The Ford Ranger stands out as a robust pickup, offering a range of engines from as low as 170 HP to a mighty 292 HP. This diversity is powered by either diesel or petrol engines, with options for either manual or automatic transmissions. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies between 7.9 to 12.1 seconds, and the Ranger can reach a top speed of 190 km/h.

On the other hand, the Range Rover Evoque holds its ground as a luxury SUV with engines ranging from 160 HP to 269 HP. Notably, it offers plug-in hybrid options, leading to impressive fuel efficiencies as low as 1.4 L/100km with an all-electric range of 68 km. Its acceleration ranges from 7.2 to 10.3 seconds to reach 100 km/h, topping out at 213 km/h. The Evoque provides a blend of elegance and functionality, making it an impressive option for urban and off-road adventures alike.

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Dimensions and Capacity

The Ford Ranger is designed for heavy-duty tasks, measuring in length from 5370 mm to 5420 mm. With a payload capacity of up to 1108 kg, this vehicle is built for work, sporting a generous cargo bay while offering seating for up to five passengers.

Conversely, the Range Rover Evoque, at a length of 4371 mm, focuses on delivering a compact SUV experience. Its payload hovers around 600 kg, with a trunk space of 472 liters, which is ample for most journeys. This model ensures that luxury remains at the forefront thanks to its refined design and practical interior space.

Range Rover Evoque @ media.landrover.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

In terms of fuel consumption, the Ranger's diesel engines range from 8.4 to 13.8 L/100km, which is expected for a pickup with its capabilities. CO2 emissions range from 220 to 315 g/km, placing it in efficiency class G.

The Evoque, especially in its plug-in hybrid version, shines with an impressive 1.4 L/100km consumption rate, emitting as little as 31 g/km of CO2, achieving a CO2 efficiency class of B. This makes the Evoque an environmentally friendlier option for drivers focused on reducing their carbon footprint.

Innovations and Features

Ford Ranger has been a favorite for those who value rugged reliability and off-road prowess. Its all-wheel drive capabilities and high torque output (reaching up to 600 Nm) make it a competent companion for any terrain.

The Range Rover Evoque, meanwhile, features Multi-Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) technology, delivering an intelligent balance of fuel economy and performance. It includes cutting-edge features such as adaptive cruise control and terrain response technology, showcasing Land Rover's dedication to luxury and innovation.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque ultimately boils down to intended use and personal preference. The Ford Ranger emerges as the ideal choice for those seeking a powerful workhorse with significant towing and payload capabilities. In contrast, the Range Rover Evoque appeals to individuals desiring a stylish, eco-friendly SUV packed with advanced features for both city driving and light off-road excursions.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Ford Ranger har et i liten grad prisfortrinn – den starter på 43800 €, mens Land Rover Range Rover Evoque koster 50500 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 6720 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Ford Ranger klarer seg med 3.10 L og er dermed en smule mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, som bruker 3.70 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.60 L per 100 km.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Land Rover Range Rover Evoque påfallende bedre: den klarer opptil 60 km, omtrent 18 km mer enn Ford Ranger.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Ford Ranger et minimal overtak – 292 hk mot 269 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 23 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Land Rover Range Rover Evoque knapt merkbar raskere – 7.20 s mot 7.90 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.70 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Land Rover Range Rover Evoque i liten grad foran – den når 213 km/h, mens Ford Ranger stopper på 190 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 23 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Ford Ranger drar klart synlig kraftigere med 697 Nm mot 540 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 157 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Land Rover Range Rover Evoque litt lettere – 1792 kg mot 2082 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 290 kg.

I nyttelast vinner Ford Ranger betydelig – 1108 kg mot 600 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 508 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Ford Ranger viser seg å være gir konkurrenten liten sjanse og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Ford Ranger som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 43 800
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C

Ford Ranger

  • Motortype : Diesel, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 170 - 292 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 3.1 - 13.8 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 42 km
detaljer

Ford Ranger

Ranger har etablert seg som en av de mest allsidige pick-upene på markedet, perfekt for både arbeid og fritid. Den robuste designen kombinert med moderne teknologi gir en tilfredsstillende kjøreopplevelse, enten du navigerer i bytrafikken eller tar deg ut i naturen. Med god lastekapasitet og komfortable sitteplasser er Ranger et utmerket valg for de som trenger både funksjonalitet og stil.

detaljer
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C @ media.ford.com
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8 @ media.ford.com

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
vurder

Range Rover Evoque kombinerer luksus og funksjonalitet på en imponerende måte, noe som gjør den til et populært valg blant urban bilkjøpere. Den slanke designen og de høykvalitetsmaterialene gir et sofistikert preg, mens firehjulstrekken sikrer god kjøreytelse under forskjellige forhold. Med sin moderne teknologi og komfortable interiør, er Evoque en perfekt følgesvenn for både hverdagskjøring og eventyr.

detaljer
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big @ media.landrover.com
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045 @ media.landrover.com
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15) @ media.landrover.com
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03 @ media.landrover.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Ranger
Range Rover Evoque

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
43800 - 83800 €
Pris
50500 - 75600 €
Forbruk L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Forbruk L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
42 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
60 km
Batterikapasitet
11.80 kWh
Batterikapasitet
11.50 kWh
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Tankkapasitet
80 L
Tankkapasitet
57 - 67 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Pickup
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
2 - 5
Seter
5
Dører
2 - 4
Dører
5
Egenvekt
2082 - 2511 kg
Egenvekt
1792 - 2157 kg
Bagasjerom
-
Bagasjerom
472 L
Lengde
5370 - 5420 mm
Lengde
4371 mm
Bredde
1918 - 1968 mm
Bredde
1900 mm
Høyde
1868 - 1922 mm
Høyde
1649 mm
Maks bagasjerom
-
Maks bagasjerom
1156 L
Nyttelast
676 - 1108 kg
Nyttelast
503 - 600 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Diesel, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plug-in hybrid
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
170 - 292 hk
Effekt hk
160 - 269 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.9 - 12.1 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.2 - 10.3 s
Maks hastighet
180 - 190 km/h
Maks hastighet
190 - 213 km/h
Dreiemoment
405 - 697 Nm
Dreiemoment
260 - 540 Nm
Antall sylindre
4 - 6
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
125 - 215 kW
Effekt kW
118 - 198 kW
Slagvolum
1996 - 2993 cm3
Slagvolum
1498 - 1998 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2022 - 2025
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
G, B
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
G, F, B
Merke
Ford
Merke
Land Rover

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Ford Ranger?

Modellen tilbys med Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.