Ford Puma vs Kia Stonic – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

A Clash of Compact Titans: Ford Puma vs. Kia Stonic

In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Kia Stonic shine as two notable contenders. Both vehicles offer an attractive blend of technology, efficiency, and style, positioning themselves as strong players in this competitive segment. Let's delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you make an informed choice.

Engine and Performance

The Ford Puma stands out with its diverse engine options, including Petrol MHEV and Electric variants. The Puma's power ranges from 125 to 160 HP for petrol engines and reaches up to 168 HP on the electric model. Its acceleration time from 0-100 km/h varies between a swift 8 to 9.8 seconds depending on the version, promising a dynamic driving experience. Additionally, the Puma offers a top speed of up to 210 km/h.

On the other hand, the Kia Stonic is primarily powered by Petrol and Petrol MHEV engines, offering between 79 and 100 HP. Although not as powerful as the Puma, the Stonic delivers reliable performance with an acceleration between 11.3 to 14.2 seconds from 0-100 km/h. The Stonic reaches a maximum speed of 179 km/h, ensuring a steady drive suitable for urban commuting.

Transmission and Drive

Both models offer manual and automatic transmission options. The Ford Puma includes a manual gearbox, dual-clutch automatic, and reduction gearbox, catering to a wide range of driving preferences. Similarly, the Kia Stonic comes with a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, highlighting flexibility for drivers seeking a more hands-on approach or a seamless automatic experience.

Fuel Efficiency and Eco Credentials

The fuel consumption for the Ford Puma varies between 5.4 to 6 L/100 km for the petrol variants and an efficient 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100 km for the electric option, boasting an impressive electric range of up to 376 km. With CO2 emissions ranging from 0 to 136 g/km, the Puma shows versatility in its eco-friendly aspirations.

Comparatively, the Kia Stonic displays a fuel consumption rate between 5.5 to 5.8 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions locked between 125 to 132 g/km. While its eco credentials are slightly less impressive than the Puma's, the Stonic maintains a respectable rating within its class.

Design and Practicality

The Ford Puma presents a sturdy SUV profile with dimensions of 4186 to 4226 mm in length, 1805 mm in width, and a height of 1550 to 1555 mm. It offers ample trunk capacity ranging from 456 to 523 liters, making it a practical choice for storage and everyday use.

The Kia Stonic, while slightly more compact, measures 4140 mm in length, 1760 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. It offers a trunk capacity of 352 liters, providing adequate space for small families or urban adventures.

Final Thoughts

Choosing between the Ford Puma and Kia Stonic depends heavily on individual preferences and needs. The Puma is favored for its powerful performance, innovative hybrid technology, and flexibility. Meanwhile, the Stonic shines with its practicality and reliable efficiency, offering an appealing package for those who prioritize a straightforward, efficient urban vehicle. Ultimately, both SUVs represent the exemplary shift towards modern, compact automotive solutions, catering to diverse lifestyles and driving desires.