Fiat Panda vs Mitsubishi Space Star – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Panda vs. Space Star: Clash of Compact Titans

Urban driving enthusiasts, rejoice! Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular and efficient hatchbacks gracing the narrow streets and challenging parking spots of modern cities. Both the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star have made names for themselves in the segment of compact hatchbacks. But what really sets these cars apart, and how do they stack up against each other? Let’s find out.

The Heart of the Beast: Engine and Performance

The Fiat Panda is powered by a 999 cm³ petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine, delivering a modest yet competent 70 horsepower (HP) and 92 Nm of torque. With a manual gearbox, this front-wheel-drive machine accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 13.9 to 14.7 seconds, and can reach speeds up to 164 km/h.

In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star comes with a slightly larger 1193 cm³ petrol engine, producing 71 HP and 102 Nm of torque. It offers both manual and automatic CVT transmission options, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 14.1 to 15.8 seconds and a maximum speed of up to 167 km/h. This slight edge in power can make a significant difference in performance, especially for those who prefer automatic transmissions for a smoother drive experience.

Fuel Efficiency: Saving on the Go

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both cars offer economically conscious solutions. The Fiat Panda consumes between 5 and 5.1 liters per 100 kilometers, with CO2 emissions ranging between 113 and 116 g/km. It also boasts a larger fuel tank capacity of 38 liters, potentially allowing for fewer stops at the gas station.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, with its fuel consumption varying from 4.9 to 5.5 liters per 100 kilometers, presents itself as a strong contender in terms of economy. Its CO2 emissions fall within the range of 112 and 125 g/km, slightly beating the Panda in greener emissions. Although its fuel tank is two liters smaller at 35 liters, its superior efficiency could offset the need for frequent refueling.

Space and Comfort: Interior and Cargo

Inside, both hatchbacks cater to small families or city adventurers with seating capacities ranging from four to five passengers. The Fiat Panda offers a trunk capacity of 225 liters, modest for light urban transportation but potentially limiting for larger cargo needs.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, slightly more accommodating, provides up to 235 liters of trunk space, granting a bit more room for those grocery runs or weekend getaways. Both models feature a practical five-door layout, ensuring easy access for passengers and parcels alike.

Dimensions and Maneuverability

The Panda stretches between 3653 and 3705 mm in length, with a width and height of up to 1662 mm and 1657 mm, respectively. These dimensions afford it a compact nature, perfect for city navigation and tight parking situations.

Meanwhile, the Space Star is slightly larger at 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and a more petite height of 1505 mm. While it offers a broader frame, it maintains agile handling in urban settings, courtesy of its smart design and engineering.

The Verdict: Which Is Right for You?

Choosing between the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star will largely depend on your preferences and needs. The Panda shines with its hybrid technology, strong efficiency, and classic Italian appeal. On the other hand, the Space Star impresses with its slightly better power output, versatility in transmission options, and a touch more cargo room.

Budget-conscious city dwellers and young families will find much to love in both models, but ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities: tech-savvy efficiency versus practical power and space. Either way, both hatchbacks are set to handle the urban jungle with ease and distinction.