DS Automobiles DS 3 vs Mazda CX-30 – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

The DS Automobiles DS 3 and the Mazda CX-30 represent two distinct approaches to the compact SUV market, blending innovative technology with unique design elements. Both vehicles are admired for their performance and features, but they cater to different types of consumers. This comparison examines their technical specifications, innovations, and overall functionalities to help potential buyers make an informed choice.

Design and Dimensions

The DS 3 retains a modern and stylish appearance characteristic of its brand, measuring 4118 mm in length, 1791 mm in width, and 1534 mm in height. It offers a sporty presence that is further enhanced by elegant curves and premium materials in the cabin. In contrast, the Mazda CX-30 is slightly larger at 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide, and 1540 mm high. The CX-30's design features a more rugged look, appealing to adventurous drivers, while still maintaining a touch of sophistication.

Performance and Powertrains

The DS 3 offers a range of engine options, including diesel, petrol MHEV, and electric variants. Its power outputs are impressive, ranging from 130 to 156 HP, with CO2 emissions as low as 0 g/km for the electric model, making it environmentally friendly. The diesel and petrol options deliver strong performance, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 9.1 seconds.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 is powered by petrol MHEV engines, generating up to 186 HP. It showcases a range of torque figures from 238 to 240 Nm and accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds. The differences in power and acceleration may appeal differently to drivers, with those seeking a sportier ride leaning towards the CX-30.

Fuel Efficiency and Range

In terms of fuel efficiency, the DS 3 shines with diesel consumption figures as low as 5 L/100 km and the electric variant boasting an electric range of 400 km with a 51 kWh battery capacity. This makes it a practical option for daily commutes and long-distance travel alike.

The Mazda CX-30, while slightly less efficient, offers a variety of fuel figures ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, depending on the chosen engine configuration. With a fuel tank capacity of 51 liters, it also provides decent range for longer journeys, though not as environmentally conscious as the electrified options from DS.

Interior and Technology

Inside the DS 3, premium materials and attention to detail create a luxurious experience. The cabin can comfort up to 5 occupants, and features cutting-edge technology options that enhance the driving experience. DS Automobiles focuses heavily on digital interfaces, offering an intuitive infotainment system that integrates seamlessly with smartphones.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a functional yet modern dashboard, also accommodating 5 passengers. The infotainment system, while user-friendly, has received some criticism for requiring a learning curve to master. However, its heads-up display and driver-centric layout provide a solid experience, catering to tech-savvy consumers.

Safety and Driver Assistance

Both models are packed with safety innovations. The DS 3 features advanced driver assistance systems that include adaptive cruise control, lane keeping assist, and a robust suite of airbags. In addition, its high CO2 efficiency ratings highlight its commitment to sustainability and eco-friendliness.

The Mazda CX-30 scores well in safety too, equipped with i-Activsense technologies that offer features like smart brake support and a rear cross-traffic alert. This not only enhances driver confidence but also takes into account modern driving challenges.

Conclusion

The choice between the DS Automobiles DS 3 and the Mazda CX-30 ultimately comes down to personal preference. The DS 3 is ideal for those seeking a cutting-edge, eco-friendly compact SUV with luxurious touches, while the Mazda CX-30 caters more to those who value sporty performance and style with robust technological features.

Both vehicles showcase the ongoing innovations within the automotive industry, each offering unique advantages that will no doubt satisfy a wide range of drivers. Whether your focus lies on fuel efficiency, performance, or advanced features, both models are contenders in the increasingly competitive SUV landscape.