VS

Dacia Jogger vs Peugeot 308 SW – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

Sammenlign ytelse, bagasjerom, forbruk og pris på et øyeblikk.
Finn ut hvilken bil som er det beste valget for deg – Dacia Jogger eller Peugeot 308 SW?

Head-to-Head: Dacia Jogger vs. Peugeot 308 SW

In the competitive world of family cars, two models stand out for their unique offerings and keen pricing: the Dacia Jogger and the Peugeot 308 SW. Both vehicles, marketed as practical yet stylish solutions, cater to different segments of the market. Let's delve into the details to see how they stack up against each other.

Design and Dimensions

The Dacia Jogger is an MPV designed for maximum flexibility. Measuring 4547 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1674 mm in height, it offers a commanding presence on the road. On the other hand, the Peugeot 308 SW, a sleek wagon, measures 4636 mm in length, 1852 mm in width, and 1442 mm in height, which brings a more streamlined and sporty look.

Engine and Performance

Under the hood, the Dacia Jogger provides a variety of engine options: full hybrid, LPG, and petrol, offering horsepower ranging from 91 to 140 HP. Its fuel consumption varies from 4.7 to 7.7 L/100km, with CO2 emissions rated as low as 105 g/km. The Peugeot 308 SW brings a broader engine range including petrol MHEV, petrol, diesel, plug-in hybrid, and electric options, with power output ranging from 130 HP to a robust 225 HP. Fuel consumption ranges from an impressive 1.3 L/100km for its plug-in hybrid to 5.9 L/100km for other models.

Interior and Practicality

The Dacia Jogger stands out with its ability to seat 5 or 7 passengers, making it ideal for larger families or carpooling needs. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 308 SW is designed as a 5-seater, with passenger comfort emphasized. In terms of trunk capacity, the Jogger offers 607 liters, just a hair below the 308 SW's slightly more generous 608 liters.

Technology and Innovations

The Peugeot 308 SW shines with its range of tech features including a sophisticated infotainment system and various driver assistance aids. Its electric variant offers a notable range up to 410 km, a compelling feature for those looking to transition to electric. The Jogger might not rival in tech frills but offers reliable essentials expected from family-oriented vehicles, ensuring safety and comfort.

Overall Verdict

Choosing between the Dacia Jogger and the Peugeot 308 SW hinges heavily on what you prioritize as a driver. If your needs lean towards space and practicality, with the option of seven seats, the Jogger presents a cost-effective choice. However, if you desire a bit more sophistication alongside advanced tech features, the Peugeot 308 SW is an attractive proposition, particularly its eco-friendly plug-in hybrid and electric versions.

Ultimately, both vehicles reflect a blend of innovation and tradition, offering varied features tailored to specific consumer needs in today's diverse automotive market.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk: Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

Dacia Jogger har et klart merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 18000 €, mens Peugeot 308 SW koster 35100 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 17150 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Peugeot 308 SW klarer seg med 0.80 L og er dermed tydelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Dacia Jogger, som bruker 4.70 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 3.90 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse: Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Peugeot 308 SW et påfallende overtak – 195 hk mot 140 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 55 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Peugeot 308 SW klart synlig raskere – 7.70 s mot 9.80 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 2.10 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Peugeot 308 SW tydelig foran – den når 225 km/h, mens Dacia Jogger stopper på 174 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 51 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Peugeot 308 SW drar påfallende kraftigere med 300 Nm mot 200 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 100 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper: Familiebil eller hverdagskamerat – hvem tilbyr mest plass, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Seter: Dacia Jogger tilbyr påfallende flere sitteplasser – 7 mot 5.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Dacia Jogger i liten grad lettere – 1251 kg mot 1475 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 224 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Peugeot 308 SW knapt merkbar mer plass – 608 L mot 607 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 1 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Dacia Jogger en smule bedre – opptil 1819 L, omtrent 185 L mer enn Peugeot 308 SW.

I nyttelast vinner Dacia Jogger en smule – 582 kg mot 500 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 82 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Peugeot 308 SW seg å være gir konkurrenten liten sjanse og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 35 100
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 125

Peugeot 308 SW

  • Motortype : Diesel, Elektrisk, Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 130 - 195 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 0.8 - 5.1 L
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 15.30 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 78 - 410 km
detaljer

Dacia Jogger

Jogger kombinerer stil og funksjonalitet på en imponerende måte, noe som gjør den til et ideelt valg for familier og eventyrere. Med sitt romslige interiør og fleksible sittealternativer, er den perfekt for både hverdagskjøring og lengre turer. Den har også et moderne design som skiller seg ut på veien, uten å gå på kompromiss med komforten.

detaljer
d220423p @ dacia-presse.de
d220425p @ dacia-presse.de
d230002p @ dacia-presse.de
d220421p @ dacia-presse.de

Peugeot 308 SW

Peugeot 308 SW er en perfekt kombinasjon av stil og funksjonalitet, med sitt elegante design og romslige interiør. Denne stasjonsvognen er ideell for familier eller de som trenger ekstra plass til utstyr, samtidig som den tilbyr en komfortabel kjøreopplevelse. Med moderne teknologi og effektive drivlinjer, er 308 SW et attraktivt valg for både hverdag og fritid.

detaljer
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 125 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 173 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 5 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 145 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_308_TESTDRIVE_0921TC 322 @ media.stellantis.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Dacia Jogger
Peugeot 308 SW
Jogger
308 SW

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
18000 - 27300 €
Pris
35100 - 49800 €
Forbruk L/100km
4.7 - 7.8 L
Forbruk L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
15.30 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
78 - 410 km
Batterikapasitet
0.60 kWh
Batterikapasitet
51 kWh
co2
105 - 137 g/km
co2
0 - 134 g/km
Tankkapasitet
40 - 50 L
Tankkapasitet
42 - 53 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
MPV
Karosseri
Stasjonsvogn
Seter
5 - 7
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1251 - 1460 kg
Egenvekt
1475 - 1791 kg
Bagasjerom
160 - 607 L
Bagasjerom
467 - 608 L
Lengde
4547 mm
Lengde
4636 mm
Bredde
1784 mm
Bredde
1852 mm
Høyde
1674 mm
Høyde
1442 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1807 - 1819 L
Maks bagasjerom
1402 - 1634 L
Nyttelast
393 - 582 kg
Nyttelast
409 - 500 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Full hybrid, LPG, Bensin
Motortype
Diesel, Elektrisk, Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse, Reduksjonsgir, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
91 - 140 hk
Effekt hk
130 - 195 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.8 - 13.2 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.7 - 10.9 s
Maks hastighet
167 - 174 km/h
Maks hastighet
170 - 225 km/h
Dreiemoment
160 - 200 Nm
Dreiemoment
230 - 300 Nm
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
67 - 103 kW
Effekt kW
96 - 144 kW
Slagvolum
999 - 1598 cm3
Slagvolum
1199 - 1598 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2023 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, D
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, A, C, B
Merke
Dacia
Merke
Peugeot

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Renault Austral takes on the Renault Rafale, two standout models in Renault's latest lineup. The Austral impresses with its agile handling and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Rafale showcases a bold design and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more dynamic driving experience.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Dacia Jogger?

Modellen tilbys med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.