@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda CX-30 – Hvilken bil er det beste valget?

To biler, én duell: CUPRA Terramar møter Mazda CX-30.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

CUPRA Terramar

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
vurder

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
vurder
Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Performance and Efficiency: CUPRA Terramar vs. Mazda CX-30

Both the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-30 make compelling arguments in the competitive SUV segment of 2024, but they are tailored for different kinds of drivers. Let's start by diving into the performance and efficiency details of these striking vehicles.

The CUPRA Terramar offers a variety of engine types, including a Plugin Hybrid and several petrol options, delivering power outputs ranging from 150 to 272 HP. The highlight is the Plugin Hybrid option, boasting a remarkable electric range of 120 km and an incredibly low consumption rate of 0.4 L/100km. On the other side, the Mazda CX-30, equipped predominantly with petrol mild hybrid engines, offers a maximum power of 186 HP and a noteworthy fuel efficiency of 5.7 L/100km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Driving Dynamics and Transmission

In terms of transmission, the CUPRA Terramar features a sleek dual-clutch automatic system that ensures rapid gear changes, enhancing the driving experience whether you're cruising through city streets or exploring rugged terrains. It offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options to cater to varied driving needs.

The Mazda CX-30 provides more traditional options with its choice of a manual gearbox or an automatic transmission, paired with either front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive mechanisms. This setup makes the CX-30 a versatile option for those who enjoy the tactile feedback of manual shifts or the convenience of automatics.

Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Design and Dimensions

Dimensionally, the CUPRA Terramar presents itself as a larger and more imposing vehicle with a length of 4519 mm, a width of 1869 mm, and a height of 1586 mm. This contributes to its spacious interior and larger trunk capacity of 540 liters, perfect for family trips or adventurous getaways.

The Mazda CX-30 is slightly more compact, with a length of 4395 mm, a width of 1795 mm, and a height of 1540 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly smaller at 430 liters, which might be a consideration for those needing extra luggage space.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Technical Sophistication and Innovations

Both SUVs come packed with modern technology aimed at improving safety and comfort. The CUPRA Terramar shines with its advanced Plugin Hybrid system, showcasing significant innovations in electric vehicle technology, while maintaining a sporty edge with its high torque output of up to 400 Nm in select models.

The Mazda CX-30 offers a refined suite of driving aids and infotainment options. Mazda's commitment to affordable luxury is evident through its array of safety features and the intuitive connect system, ensuring a smooth and enjoyable ride.

Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Conclusion: Customizing Your SUV Experience

The CUPRA Terramar and Mazda CX-30 offer distinctive propositions in the SUV market. The Terramar provides cutting-edge hybrid technology and a spacious, adaptable design, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and innovation. Conversely, the CX-30 shines with its elegant simplicity, solid performance, and efficiency, especially suited for those who appreciate driving dynamics and traditional powertrains.

Ultimately, the choice between the CUPRA Terramar and Mazda CX-30 will heavily depend on your driving priorities—whether you lean towards state-of-the-art hybrid technologies or value the straightforward pleasure of driving a petrol-engine SUV.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Kostnader og forbruk

Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

Mazda CX-30 har et klart merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 29400 €, mens CUPRA Terramar koster 43000 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 13580 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Mazda CX-30 klarer seg med 5.70 L og er dermed nesten umerkelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn CUPRA Terramar, som bruker 6.10 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.40 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har CUPRA Terramar et klart synlig overtak – 265 hk mot 186 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 79 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er CUPRA Terramar betydelig raskere – 5.90 s mot 8.30 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 2.40 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger CUPRA Terramar i liten grad foran – den når 243 km/h, mens Mazda CX-30 stopper på 204 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 39 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: CUPRA Terramar drar merkbar kraftigere med 400 Nm mot 240 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 160 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Mazda CX-30 en smule lettere – 1455 kg mot 1638 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 183 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr CUPRA Terramar tydelig mer plass – 540 L mot 430 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 110 L.

I nyttelast vinner CUPRA Terramar lett – 542 kg mot 496 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 46 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

CUPRA Terramar viser seg å være er overlegen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår CUPRA Terramar som den mer komplette allrounderen.

CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-30

Kostnader og forbruk
Vis detaljert analyse

Motor og ytelse
Vis detaljert analyse

Mål og karosseri
Vis detaljert analyse
fra ca. € 43 000
Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Terramar

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV, Bensin
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 150 - 265 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 6.1 - 8.4 L
detaljer

CUPRA Terramar

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
vurder

CUPRA Terramar kombinerer sportslig sjel med praktisk SUV-dynamikk og leverer mer nerve enn mange tør å forvente. Interiøret er førerorientert med gode materialvalg og en tydelig fokus på kjøreglede uten at hverdagsfunksjonaliteten blir forsømt.

detaljer
IMG_0231 @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
vurder

Mazda CX-30 pakker et elegant utseende og en overraskende leken kjørefølelse inn i en praktisk pakke som passer like godt til bykjøring som til helgetur. Interiøret er nøye gjennomtenkt og gir deg en premiumfølelse uten å tømme sparegrisen — en smart og sjarmerende bil for den som vil ha både stil og kjøreglede.

detaljer
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Anmeldelser CUPRA Terramar

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
vurder

Anmeldelser Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Anmeldelser)
vurder

Topp bilsammenligninger

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda CX-30
Terramar @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
43000 - 56600 €
Pris
29400 - 42900 €
Forbruk L/100km
6.1 - 8.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
139 - 191 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Tankkapasitet
55 - 60 L
Tankkapasitet
48 - 51 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1638 - 1750 kg
Egenvekt
1455 - 1587 kg
Bagasjerom
540 L
Bagasjerom
422 - 430 L
Lengde
4519 mm
Lengde
4395 mm
Bredde
1869 mm
Bredde
1795 mm
Høyde
1586 mm
Høyde
1540 mm
Maks bagasjerom
-
Maks bagasjerom
1398 - 1406 L
Nyttelast
540 - 542 kg
Nyttelast
458 - 496 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Bensin
Motortype
Bensin MHEV
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
150 - 265 hk
Effekt hk
140 - 186 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.9 - 9.3 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.3 - 10.3 s
Maks hastighet
205 - 243 km/h
Maks hastighet
191 - 204 km/h
Dreiemoment
250 - 400 Nm
Dreiemoment
238 - 240 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
110 - 195 kW
Effekt kW
103 - 137 kW
Slagvolum
1498 - 1984 cm3
Slagvolum
1998 - 2488 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, G, F
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E
Merke
CUPRA
Merke
Mazda

Lignende bilsammenligninger

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.4
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Aygo
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Aygo is a cheeky, pocket-sized city flirt — nimble, affordable and full of personality, but cramped and a little outgunned on fast roads. The Yaris is the grown-up supermini: roomier, safer and available as a frugal hybrid, making it the smarter choice for buyers who want everyday practicality …
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr CUPRA Terramar?

CUPRA Terramar er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.

do not click