BMW iX1 vs MINI Countryman – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

BMW iX1 vs MINI Countryman: A Detailed Comparison

In the rapidly evolving world of electric and hybrid SUVs, two models stand out for their distinctive blend of performance, design, and innovation: the BMW iX1 and the MINI Countryman. Both vehicles represent the finest elements of their respective brands and are a testament to the automotive industry's commitment to sustainability without compromising on driving pleasure.

Engine and Performance

The BMW iX1 offers a fully electric experience with two powertrain options, providing 204 HP in the front-wheel-drive version and a more robust 313 HP in the all-wheel-drive variant. The torque figures are equally impressive, with the higher model delivering a substantial 494 Nm. This provides an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 5.6 seconds, rivaling many traditional combustion engines while maintaining a top speed of 180 km/h.

On the other hand, the MINI Countryman offers a diverse range of engines, including petrol, diesel, and electric options, with power outputs ranging up to 313 HP. Its acceleration varies, with its fastest option hitting 0-100 km/h in 5.4 seconds, closely matching the BMW's capabilities. The top speed can reach up to an exhilarating 250 km/h, showcasing MINI's sportier approach in their upper-tier models.

Range and Efficiency

When it comes to electric range, the BMW iX1 offers a competitive reach of up to 463 km, supported by a 64.8 kWh battery. This range allows for longer journeys without frequent recharging needs and positions the iX1 as a practical option for many drivers.

The MINI Countryman, equipped with a slightly smaller 64.6 kWh battery, provides a comparable electric range of 462 km. Despite its broader engine variety, MINI has managed to maintain competitive electric efficiency, making it a versatile choice for those not entirely committed to an electric-only future.

Design and Dimensions

In terms of size, the BMW iX1 stands tall with dimensions of 4500 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and a height of 1616 mm. Its curb weight varies from 1940 to 2085 kg, signifying a solid build that contributes to stability on the road.

The MINI Countryman is slightly more compact, measuring around 4444 to 4447 mm in length, with a width of 1843 mm. Height-wise, it ranges from 1635 to 1661 mm, catering to urban maneuverability without losing its adventurous SUV character. With a lighter curb weight starting at 1620 kg extending to 1940 kg, the Countryman often delivers nimble handling, a hallmark of MINI's design philosophy.

Interior and Practicality

Both models offer seating for five passengers, combining practicality with luxury. The trunk capacity of the BMW iX1 is 490 liters, catering well to families or those needing to transport goods comfortably. The MINI Countryman provides a flexible trunk capacity, ranging from 450 to 505 liters, slightly edging out the iX1 in storage flexibility.

Innovations and Technology

The 2023 BMW iX1 is loaded with the latest technology, including state-of-the-art driver assistance systems and a modern infotainment setup that enhances the driving experience. BMW’s focus on sustainability is evident from the iX1's CO2 efficiency class of 'A', resulting in zero direct emissions.

MINI's 2024 Countryman doesn’t lag in innovation, featuring advanced tech options and hybridization for those seeking a blend of traditional and modern driving experiences. It encompasses a range of CO2 classifications from efficient 'A' models to more conventional categories, reflecting its versatile engine options.

Conclusion

Choosing between the BMW iX1 and the MINI Countryman largely depends on personal preference. The iX1 is tailored towards those seeking a pure electric experience with a focus on luxury and sustainability. Meanwhile, the Countryman appeals to drivers looking for a blend of tradition and innovation, offering a variety of powertrains and dynamic performance capabilities. Both models prove that sustainability and driving pleasure can coexist, making the decision a matter of stylistic preference rather than a compromise on performance or efficiency.