VS

Audi Q3 vs Dacia Duster – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Sammenlign ytelse, bagasjerom, forbruk og pris på et øyeblikk.
Finn ut hvilken bil som er det beste valget for deg – Audi Q3 eller Dacia Duster?

Clash of the Compact SUVs: Audi Q3 vs Dacia Duster

With the rise of compact SUVs in the automotive market, the Audi Q3 and Dacia Duster have garnered significant attention. Both offer a blend of design, performance, and practicality, but they cater to different preferences. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that distinguish these two models.

Performance and Engine Options

The Audi Q3 showcases a diverse range of engine options with its 2024 model featuring both petrol and diesel variants, capable of producing between 150 to 245 horsepower. A choice between a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic transmission further enhances its versatility. Furthermore, the Q3 offers the option of front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive, ensuring superior adaptability to various driving conditions.

By contrast, the Dacia Duster emphasizes efficiency and eco-friendliness with its engine choices, which include LPG, full hybrid, and petrol mild-hybrid (MHEV) variations. Although it has a lower maximum power range of 91 to 140 horsepower, the Duster compensates with impressive fuel economy, consuming as low as 5 to 6.5 litres per 100 km. Like the Q3, it also offers both manual and automated manual transmission options.

Acceleration and Top Speed

In terms of acceleration, the Audi Q3 is the sportier option, capable of sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.8 to 9.5 seconds, depending on the engine variant. The top speed ranges from 204 to 237 km/h, underlining its performance-oriented design.

While the Dacia Duster falls behind in acceleration, with times ranging from 9.9 to 14 seconds, it retains a respectable top speed of up to 180 km/h. This performance, though modest compared to the Q3, aligns with its economical and accessible nature.

Dimensions and Practicality

The Audi Q3 measures between 4484 and 4500 mm in length, with a trunk capacity of 530 litres, making it a practical choice for those who require ample space without sacrificing luxury. It also offers a payload ranging from 455 to 495 kg.

On the other hand, the Dacia Duster, slightly more compact at 4343 mm in length, offers a range of trunk capacities from 430 to 517 litres. Its payload capacity varies from 414 to 430 kg, catering well to families and adventure enthusiasts looking for practicality.

Environmental Impact and Efficiency

Both SUVs come equipped with emissions control, but the Duster edges out with a lower CO2 efficiency class, ranging from C to E, compared to the Q3's E to G classification. The Duster's lower CO2 output, between 114 and 147 g/km, highlights its eco-friendly credentials over the Q3 which ranges from 149 to 193 g/km.

Conclusion: Luxury vs. Practicality

The Audi Q3 prides itself on its luxury and performance, offering more power and speed, supplemented by high-end features and an all-around more opulent driving experience. Conversely, the Dacia Duster focuses on practicality and economy, making it an attractive alternative for budget-conscious buyers seeking value and efficiency in a compact SUV.

Ultimately, the choice between the two comes down to one's personal priorities: the sporty sophistication of the Audi Q3 or the functional pragmatism of the Dacia Duster.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk: Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Dacia Duster har et klart merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 19000 €, mens Audi Q3 koster 44600 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 25610 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Audi Q3 klarer seg med 1.70 L og er dermed klart merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Dacia Duster, som bruker 5 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 3.30 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse: Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Audi Q3 et tydelig overtak – 272 hk mot 140 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 132 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Audi Q3 betydelig raskere – 5.70 s mot 9.90 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 4.20 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Audi Q3 tydelig foran – den når 240 km/h, mens Dacia Duster stopper på 180 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 60 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Audi Q3 drar betydelig kraftigere med 400 Nm mot 230 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 170 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper: Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Dacia Duster merkbar lettere – 1351 kg mot 1635 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 284 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Dacia Duster nesten umerkelig mer plass – 517 L mot 488 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 29 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Dacia Duster en smule bedre – opptil 1609 L, omtrent 223 L mer enn Audi Q3.

I nyttelast vinner Audi Q3 noe – 535 kg mot 430 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 105 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Audi Q3 seg å være vinner duellen klart og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 44 600
A188605_overfull

Audi Q3

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid, Diesel
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 150 - 272 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 118 - 119 km
detaljer

Audi Q3

5 (1)
vurder

Audi Q3 er en kompakt premium-SUV som leverer et stilrent ytre og en overraskende romslig, velbygget kupé — perfekt for dem som vil ha luksus uten å være prangende. Kjøreopplevelsen er trygg og presis, interiøret føles gjennomført og praktisk, og bilen gjør både bykjøring og langtur til en trivelig affære uten drama.

detaljer
A188605_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188610_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188613_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A1814467_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com
A188626_overfull @ audi-mediacenter.com

Dacia Duster

5 (1)
vurder

Dacia Duster er en overraskende praktisk og robust SUV som gir mye bil for pengene uten å late som den er premium. Den er enkel og smart innredet, tåler både bykjøring og grusveier, og er et fornuftig valg for de som vil ha nytte fremfor glamour.

detaljer
d220402p @ dacia-presse.de
Dacia_Duster_2 @ dacia-presse.de
d220403p @ dacia-presse.de
d220404p @ dacia-presse.de

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Audi Q3
Dacia Duster
Q3
Duster

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
44600 - 61800 €
Pris
19000 - 29000 €
Forbruk L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L
Forbruk L/100km
5 - 7.6 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
118 - 119 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
19.70 kWh
Batterikapasitet
0.60 kWh
co2
39 - 195 g/km
co2
113 - 148 g/km
Tankkapasitet
45 - 60 L
Tankkapasitet
49 - 55 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1635 - 1900 kg
Egenvekt
1351 - 1465 kg
Bagasjerom
375 - 488 L
Bagasjerom
430 - 517 L
Lengde
4531 mm
Lengde
4343 mm
Bredde
1859 mm
Bredde
1813 mm
Høyde
1559 - 1601 mm
Høyde
1656 - 1661 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1196 - 1386 L
Maks bagasjerom
1545 - 1609 L
Nyttelast
505 - 535 kg
Nyttelast
414 - 430 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid, Diesel
Motortype
LPG, Full hybrid, Bensin MHEV
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisert manuell girkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
150 - 272 hk
Effekt hk
91 - 140 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.7 - 9.2 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.9 - 14 s
Maks hastighet
208 - 240 km/h
Maks hastighet
160 - 180 km/h
Dreiemoment
250 - 400 Nm
Dreiemoment
160 - 230 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
110 - 200 kW
Effekt kW
67 - 104 kW
Slagvolum
1498 - 1984 cm3
Slagvolum
999 - 1598 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2025
Modellår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, G, B
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, C, E
Merke
Audi
Merke
Dacia

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Renault Austral takes on the Renault Rafale, two standout models in Renault's latest lineup. The Austral impresses with its agile handling and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Rafale showcases a bold design and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more dynamic driving experience.
Er Audi Q3 tilgjengelig med ulike drivtyper?

Audi Q3 er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.