MG ZS vs Dacia Bigster – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Dynamic SUV Showdown: MG ZS vs. Dacia Bigster

The SUV market is buzzing with options, each vying for the attention of drivers seeking reliability, space, and cutting-edge technology. Among these, the MG ZS and the Dacia Bigster emerge as prominent contenders, each presenting its unique strengths and features. This comparison dives into technical aspects and innovative features that set these SUVs apart.

Powertrain and Performance

The MG ZS offers diverse engine choices, catering to a wide range of preferences. Available in electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants, the ZS ensures it covers the gamut of efficiency-conscious and performance-driven customers. The electric variant boasts a power output of 156 HP and an electric range up to 440 km, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers.

In contrast, the Dacia Bigster provides options in petrol MHEV, full hybrid, and LPG engine types. Its most potent offering delivers 155 HP with a consumption rate of 4.7 L/100km, ideal for drivers seeking moderate power with economic fuel efficiency. The Bigster also offers manual and automatic transmissions, allowing customization to drivability preferences.

Dimensions and Practicality

Size matters within the SUV segment, and both vehicles deliver generous interior space. The MG ZS measures up to 4430 mm in length, slightly shorter than the Dacia Bigster's 4570 mm but provides ample trunk space at 448 liters. Enough to cater to urban family adventures or road trips.

The Dacia Bigster, however, steps ahead in practical storage with a trunk capacity reaching up to 667 liters, ideal for those needing to transport larger cargo. Built slightly taller with a height of 1705 mm compared to the ZS's 1649 mm, the Bigster capitalizes on its space advantage without sacrificing style.

Technical Innovations

MG takes a forward-thinking approach by equipping the ZS with cutting-edge electric technology. Its electric variant with a 65.7 kWh battery sets a standard for reduced emissions, showing MG's commitment to sustainability and future mobility.

Meanwhile, the Bigster focuses on the practical and rugged adaptability with an option for all-wheel drive, embracing varied terrains with grace and stability. The Bigster’s multi-engine offerings with LPG as an option suggest a traditional approach while offering eco-conscious solutions as well.

Performance and Efficiency

Both models maintain commendable CO2 efficiency. The MG ZS electric version achieves a class-leading zero emissions, making it a top choice within the eco-friendly segment. For the petrol option, its CO2 emissions range from 113 to 145 g/km.

The Dacia Bigster remains competitive in CO2 efficiency, achieving as low as 106 g/km. This positions the Bigster as a keen alternative for those seeking a balance between performance and environmental responsibility.

Conclusion

In this comparison, the MG ZS and the Dacia Bigster showcase their unique strengths tailored to different driving needs and preferences. The MG ZS stands out with its electric efficiency and technological innovations, appealing to the modern, eco-conscious driver. On the other hand, the Dacia Bigster appeals to those valuing practicality, space, and rugged versatility, making it a worthy candidate for adventurous journeys.

Ultimately, the choice between the MG ZS and Dacia Bigster hinges on whether one prioritizes cutting-edge electric technology or robust traditional engineering embracing diverse fuels and terrains.