VS

Mercedes GLA vs Renault Arkana – Hvilken bil er det beste valget?

Enten du ser etter en bil til hverdagsbruk, familie eller lange turer – her ser du forskjellene.
Finn ut om Mercedes GLA eller Renault Arkana passer best til din livsstil.

GLA @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Battle of the Compact SUVs: Mercedes GLA vs. Renault Arkana

In the rapidly evolving world of compact SUVs, two models have stood out for their engineering prowess and innovation: the Mercedes GLA and the Renault Arkana. As urban jungles become more congested and car owners look for vehicles that pack performance and efficiency, we pit these two fierce competitors against each other to see which one claims the throne.

Arkana @ Renault

Design and Dimensions

Starting with design, the Mercedes GLA offers a more traditional upscale appearance that the German brand is known for, with its dimensions measuring 4412 to 4443 mm in length, 1834 to 1849 mm in width, and 1590 to 1616 mm in height. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana strikes a bolder and sportier silhouette with a length of 4568 mm, a width of 1821 mm, and a height of 1576 mm, making it slightly larger overall.

The trunk capacity is another critical factor for SUV owners. The Arkana leads in this regard, offering up to 513 liters compared to the GLA's 385 to 435 liters, giving families and adventurers extra space for their needs.

GLA @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Performance and Efficiency

Both vehicles feature a variety of engine options, but the GLA's lineup is more extensive, catering to those who crave both performance and efficiency. The Mercedes GLA comes with petrol MHEV, diesel, plug-in hybrid, and regular petrol engines. It can produce from 116 HP up to a powerful AMG variant at 421 HP, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.3 seconds. Although it’s pricier, the all-wheel-drive option offers enhanced handling and grip.

In contrast, Renault Arkana focuses on a harmonious blend of performance and efficiency, boasting full hybrid and petrol MHEV engines. With output ranging from 140 to 158 HP, the Arkana's acceleration isn’t as quick, with a 0-100 km/h time between 9.1 and 10.8 seconds. However, it impresses in fuel efficiency with consumption figures from 4.7 to 6 L/100km compared to the GLA's 1 to 9.5 L/100km, thanks in part to its lighter curb weight of 1411 to 1510 kg.

Arkana @ Renault

Technological Advancements

Mercedes enjoys a reputation for innovation, showcased in the GLA's advanced MBUX infotainment system, voice-controlled functions, and various driving assists that make every journey both enjoyable and safe. Features like AI-driven navigation and adaptive cruise control align with the expectations of premium SUV drivers.

The Renault Arkana incorporates a more straightforward, user-friendly interface with its systems. Its standout includes the EASY LINK multimedia system that impressively handles connectivity, navigation, and safety features. Even with its more affordable price point, Renault ensures that Arkana’s tech doesn't lag much behind luxury lines.

GLA @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Driving Comfort and Interior Experience

Inside, the GLA radiates luxury with high-quality materials and a focus on passenger comfort and convenience. The seats are supportive, and the cabin is well-insulated from external noise, contributing to a premium drive experience.

Arkana's interior strikes a balance between style and functionality, offering a comfortable ride that accommodates five passengers. Its spacious interior doesn’t skimp on quality, providing a comfortable environment across its lineup.

Arkana @ Renault

Final Verdict

Both the Mercedes GLA and Renault Arkana deliver unique benefits that cater to different audiences. The GLA is perfect for those who prioritize higher performance and luxury, justified by a steeper price tag, while the Arkana is ideal for buyers looking for practicality without sacrificing style or technological convenience.

In this battle of compact SUVs, the winner truly depends on personal preferences. Whether you're drawn to the Mercedes GLA with its power and tech-savvy aura or the Renault Arkana with its efficiency and bold aesthetics, both vehicles are commendable choices for modern drivers.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

GLA @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Renault Arkana har et merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 33200 €, mens Mercedes GLA koster 45300 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 12109 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Mercedes GLA klarer seg med 2.90 L og er dermed klart merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Renault Arkana, som bruker 4.70 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.80 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Mercedes GLA et tydelig overtak – 421 hk mot 143 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 278 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Mercedes GLA overbevisende raskere – 4.30 s mot 10.80 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 6.50 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Mercedes GLA påfallende foran – den når 270 km/h, mens Renault Arkana stopper på 172 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 98 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Mercedes GLA drar tydelig kraftigere med 500 Nm mot 205 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 295 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Familiebil eller hverdagskamerat – hvem tilbyr mest plass, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Renault Arkana minimal lettere – 1510 kg mot 1570 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 60 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Renault Arkana nesten umerkelig mer plass – 480 L mot 435 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 45 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Mercedes GLA en smule bedre – opptil 1430 L, omtrent 167 L mer enn Renault Arkana.

I nyttelast vinner Mercedes GLA lett – 500 kg mot 451 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 49 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Mercedes GLA viser seg å være er overlegen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Mercedes GLA som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 45 300
20C0047_067

Mercedes GLA

  • Motortype : Plug-in hybrid, Bensin MHEV, Diesel, Bensin
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 116 - 421 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 2.9 - 9.5 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 74 km
detaljer

Mercedes GLA

Mercedes GLA kombinerer kompakt SUV-holdning med den luksuriøse følelsen man forventer fra stjernen på panseret, og føles både smidig i byen og trygg på landeveien. Innvendig møter moderne teknologi og gjennomført materialkvalitet praktisk hverdagskomfort, så den passer like godt for familier som for den som bare vil ha litt ekstra status i garasjen.

detaljer
20C0047_067 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
20C0047_071 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
20C0047_104 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
20C0047_115 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
vurder

Renault Arkana ser ut som en sporty coupé som har fått ekstra høyde og en dose praktisk sans — perfekt for de som vil ha SUV-utsikt uten å ofre stilen. Interiøret er moderne og ukomplisert, med smarte løsninger for hverdagsbruk og en kjørefølelse som føles trygg og lett å like.

detaljer
r210653p @ Renault
r210654p @ Renault
r210665p @ Renault
r210657p @ Renault
r210613p @ Renault
r210616p @ Renault

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Mercedes GLA
Renault Arkana
GLA
Arkana

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
45300 - 87900 €
Pris
33200 - 37300 €
Forbruk L/100km
2.9 - 9.5 L
Forbruk L/100km
4.70 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
74 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
12.90 kWh
Batterikapasitet
0.60 kWh
co2
66 - 216 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Tankkapasitet
35 - 51 L
Tankkapasitet
50 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1570 - 1810 kg
Egenvekt
1510 kg
Bagasjerom
385 - 435 L
Bagasjerom
480 L
Lengde
4412 - 4443 mm
Lengde
4568 mm
Bredde
1834 - 1849 mm
Bredde
1821 mm
Høyde
1590 - 1616 mm
Høyde
1576 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1385 - 1430 L
Maks bagasjerom
1263 L
Nyttelast
480 - 500 kg
Nyttelast
451 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Plug-in hybrid, Bensin MHEV, Diesel, Bensin
Motortype
Full hybrid
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
116 - 421 hk
Effekt hk
143 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
4.3 - 11 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
10.80 s
Maks hastighet
190 - 270 km/h
Maks hastighet
172 km/h
Dreiemoment
230 - 500 Nm
Dreiemoment
205 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
85 - 310 kW
Effekt kW
105 kW
Slagvolum
1332 - 1991 cm3
Slagvolum
1598 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B, E, F, G
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C
Merke
Mercedes-Benz
Merke
Renault

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech features that appeal to younger buyers. Ultimately, both models excel in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, making them top choices for families and urban dwellers alike.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Mercedes GLA?

Finnes som Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.