@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mercedes Citan vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

To biler, én duell: Mercedes Citan møter Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

A Clash of Compact Titans: Mercedes Citan vs. Renault Kangoo

When it comes to small commercial vehicles, the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter are two names that often emerge as leaders in the market. These compact yet robust options provide businesses and individuals alike with versatile solutions to various transportation needs. In this article, we will examine the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance that set these two vehicles apart.

Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Design and Exterior Dimensions

The Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter each offer distinct styles that cater to different tastes and business requirements. The Citan, a high-roof wagon, carries the hallmark elegance of Mercedes-Benz within its 4,498mm length, 1,859mm width, and variable height up to 1,830mm. On the other hand, the Kangoo boasts a more utilitarian cargo van design, slightly longer at 4,910mm, with a width of 1,860mm and a height up to 1,864mm, making it slightly larger and well-suited for transporting larger loads.

Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Powertrain Options and Performance

Under the hood, both models deliver a range of powertrains to suit different driving needs. The Mercedes Citan offers versatility with petrol, diesel, and electric powertrains, with power outputs ranging from 95 to 131 HP. Acceleration figures vary, with the fastest petrol option reaching 100 km/h in 13 seconds, while the fully electric version promises an efficient and smooth ride with a range of up to 280 km.

The Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter, likewise, offers diesel, petrol, and electric engines, boasting power outputs between 75 and 130 HP. Acceleration varies from 11.6 seconds for the petrol engines to a more leisurely 18.9 seconds for some diesel variants, yet its electric variant shines with a slightly longer range of 293 km, ideal for eco-conscious urban commuting.

Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Transmission and Drive Type

Both vehicles feature manual and automatic transmission options, catering to traditionalists and those seeking the ease of an automatic. The front-wheel drive design is standard across all powertrains, ensuring stability and smooth handling in urban environments. The Citan’s dual-clutch automatic transmission offers seamless gear shifts, providing drivers with an elevated driving experience. In contrast, the Kangoo’s emphasis on efficiency includes a practical manual gearbox tailored for everyday utility.

Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Efficiency and Eco-friendliness

Efficiency is a key consideration for these vehicles. The Citan reports consumption between 5.3 and 7.1 liters/100 km for internal combustion engines and as low as 19.3 kWh/100 km for electric variants. The Kangoo counters with fuel consumption figures of 4.9 to 7.0 liters/100 km and electric consumption starting at 18.4 kWh/100 km. Both models contribute to reducing carbon footprints, with the Citan achieving CO2 efficiency classes from A to F, similar to the Kangoo.

Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Interior Comfort and Capacity

Inside, the Mercedes Citan comfortably seats up to five passengers and offers a generous trunk capacity of up to 551 liters, adequate for both commercial and everyday use. The Renault Kangoo prioritizes cargo space, with a payload capacity ranging from 508 to 767 kg, thanks to its focus on maximizing internal space for goods rather than passengers, typically seating just two.

Conclusion: Picking the Perfect Partner

Choosing between the Mercedes Citan and Renault Kangoo Kleintransporter largely depends on the specific requirements of potential buyers. The Citan excels with its luxury touches and versatility, making it a strong contender for business owners seeking a blend of prestige and functionality. Meanwhile, the Kangoo stands out for businesses focused on logistics and transport, offering larger cargo capacities and robust practicality.

In the end, both these vehicles demonstrate remarkable innovations and capabilities within the compact transport sector, ensuring that regardless of the choice, buyers can expect dependability, efficiency, and modern technology from either option.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

Renault Kangoo Compact Van har et nesten umerkelig prisfortrinn – den starter på 26200 €, mens Mercedes Citan koster 26200 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 4 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Renault Kangoo Compact Van klarer seg med 5.10 L og er dermed knapt merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Mercedes Citan, som bruker 5.20 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.10 L per 100 km.

I strømforbruk har Renault Kangoo Compact Van fordelen: med 18.70 kWh per 100 km er den nesten umerkelig mer effektiv enn Mercedes Citan, som bruker 19.30 kWh. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.60 kWh.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Renault Kangoo Compact Van nesten umerkelig bedre: den klarer opptil 290 km, omtrent 10 km mer enn Mercedes Citan.

Motor og ytelse

Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Mercedes Citan et nesten umerkelig overtak – 131 hk mot 122 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 9 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Renault Kangoo Compact Van en smule raskere – 11.60 s mot 13 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.40 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Mercedes Citan nesten umerkelig foran – den når 183 km/h, mens Renault Kangoo Compact Van stopper på 176 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 7 km/h.

Dreiemomentet er identisk for begge modeller – 270 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Renault Kangoo Compact Van nesten umerkelig lettere – 1493 kg mot 1556 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 63 kg.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Renault Kangoo Compact Van påfallende bedre – opptil 4900 L, omtrent 1240 L mer enn Mercedes Citan.

I nyttelast vinner Renault Kangoo Compact Van påfallende – 901 kg mot 644 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 257 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Renault Kangoo Compact Van seg å være dominerer sammenligningen og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 26 200
Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

  • Motortype : Diesel, Elektrisk
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 75 - 122 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 5.1 - 5.5 L
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 18.7 - 21.1 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 261 - 290 km
detaljer

Mercedes Citan

Mercedes Citan fremstår som en smart og velformet arbeidspartner som klarer å være både praktisk og pen samtidig. For småbedriftseiere og byfolk som vil ha romslighet uten bølling, leverer Citan akkurat det du trenger — pålitelig og med et snev av klasse.

detaljer

Renault Kangoo Compact Van

Renault Kangoo er en praktisk og smidig varebil perfekt for bykjøring og småbedrifter — enkel å manøvrere og overraskende romslig i lasteområdet. Den er fornuftig, driftsikker og gjør jobben uten krøll, et kjekkt valg for deg som vil ha en arbeidskamerat på hjul.

detaljer
r221168p @ Renault Group Media
r221165p @ Renault Group Media
r221166p @ Renault Group Media
r221163p @ Renault Group Media
r221155p @ Renault Group Media
r221162p @ Renault Group Media

Topp bilsammenligninger

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage …
Mercedes Citan
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
Kangoo Compact Van @ Renault Group Media

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
26200 - 35100 €
Pris
26200 - 43100 €
Forbruk L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh
Forbruk kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
265 - 280 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
261 - 290 km
Batterikapasitet
45 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
0 - 167 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Tankkapasitet
54 L
Tankkapasitet
54 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Høy tak stasjonsvogn
Karosseri
Varebil
Seter
5
Seter
2 - 5
Dører
5
Dører
4 - 5
Egenvekt
1556 - 2010 kg
Egenvekt
1493 - 1910 kg
Bagasjerom
0 - 551 L
Bagasjerom
-
Lengde
4498 - 4922 mm
Lengde
4486 - 4910 mm
Bredde
1859 mm
Bredde
1860 mm
Høyde
1811 - 1830 mm
Høyde
1854 - 1864 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1979 - 3660 L
Maks bagasjerom
3000 - 4900 L
Nyttelast
485 - 644 kg
Nyttelast
498 - 901 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin, Diesel, Elektrisk
Motortype
Diesel, Elektrisk
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Reduksjonsgir
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Reduksjonsgir
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
95 - 131 hk
Effekt hk
75 - 122 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
13 - 15.5 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
11.6 - 18.9 s
Maks hastighet
132 - 183 km/h
Maks hastighet
132 - 176 km/h
Dreiemoment
200 - 270 Nm
Dreiemoment
230 - 270 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
70 - 96 kW
Effekt kW
55 - 90 kW
Slagvolum
1332 - 1461 cm3
Slagvolum
1461 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2021 - 2024
Modellår
2022 - 2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
F, E, A
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E, A
Merke
Mercedes-Benz
Merke
Renault

Lignende bilsammenligninger

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.4
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech …
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Mercedes Citan?

Finnes som Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.