VS

Ford Transit Connect vs Peugeot Rifter – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Ford Transit Connect eller Peugeot Rifter?

Transit Connect @ media.ford.com

In the ever-evolving world of commercial vehicles, businesses are constantly searching for options that blend functionality, efficiency, and innovation. Two strong contenders that stand out in this regard are the Ford Transit Connect and the Peugeot Rifter. Both models cater to the needs of businesses and families alike, but they come with unique features and specifications that set them apart. In this article, we’ll compare the two, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations.

Rifter @ media.stellantis.com

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Transit Connect is a versatile cargo van, measuring between 4500 mm to 4868 mm in length, 1855 mm in width, and a height of 1860 mm. This design makes it a suitable choice for transporting goods while still providing adequate passenger seating for up to five individuals. Its robust build stems from its intent to serve commercial purposes effectively.

In contrast, the Peugeot Rifter is classified as a high roof wagon, measuring 4405 mm to 4755 mm in length and 1848 mm in width. With a height range of 1818 mm to 1837 mm, the Rifter is designed for both spacious passenger transport—including options for seven seats—and accommodating cargo needs. This makes it more versatile for family trips while also being practical for businesses.

Transit Connect @ media.ford.com

Engine Options and Performance

Ford offers a robust lineup of engines for the Transit Connect, including diesel options and a plug-in hybrid variant. The power output ranges from 102 to 150 HP, with a maximum torque of up to 350 Nm. This engine versatility ensures that the Transit Connect can manage a range of driving conditions efficiently. It also boasts a fuel tank capacity of 50 liters, allowing for long journeys without frequent refuels.

On the other hand, the Peugeot Rifter showcases a diverse engine range including electric, petrol, and diesel options. Power output varies from 102 to 136 HP while maintaining torque levels between 205 Nm and 300 Nm. The electric variant also offers an impressive range of up to 340 km on a single charge, catering to the growing demand for eco-friendly vehicles. Its larger fuel tank capacity of 60 liters underscores its suitability for longer trips.

Rifter @ media.stellantis.com

Transmission and Drivetrain

The Transit Connect is fitted with either a manual or dual-clutch automatic transmission, both providing smooth gear transitions suitable for city driving and long-distance travel. Its front-wheel-drive configuration enhances stability, offering improved grip in various road and weather conditions.

The Peugeot Rifter similarly features a range of transmission options including manual and automatic configurations. The inclusion of a reduction gearbox in its ranges gives drivers the benefit of better torque control, especially when carrying heavier loads. Like the Transit Connect, it also employs a front-wheel-drive system, contributing to its reliability.

Transit Connect @ media.ford.com

Safety and Technological Innovations

When it comes to safety, the Ford Transit Connect impresses with options like advanced driver assistance systems to enhance the driving experience. Features such as lane-keeping assist and blind-spot monitoring are particularly useful for commercial drivers who spend extensive time on the roads. The 2024 model also comes equipped with improved infotainment options, making it user-friendly.

The Peugeot Rifter doesn’t fall short in this department either. Packed with modern safety features, it includes innovative technology such as automatic emergency braking and adaptive cruise control. Furthermore, its interior is designed for comfort with smart storage solutions and connectivity options, making it ideal for both family and commercial use.

Rifter @ media.stellantis.com

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In the battle of the Ford Transit Connect versus the Peugeot Rifter, the choice ultimately hinges on the specific needs of the buyer. The Transit Connect is ideal for businesses prioritizing cargo capacity and diesel efficiency, while the Rifter appeals to families and businesses looking for versatility and an eco-friendly alternative with its electric option.

Both vehicles represent a commitment to innovation and reliability in the commercial vehicle segment. Whether you opt for the rugged Transit Connect or the spacious Rifter, you're sure to find a vehicle that meets your transportation needs effectively.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

Peugeot Rifter har et en smule prisfortrinn – den starter på 27800 €, mens Ford Transit Connect koster 31200 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 3388 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Ford Transit Connect klarer seg med 0.50 L og er dermed klart merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Peugeot Rifter, som bruker 5.60 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 5.10 L per 100 km.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Peugeot Rifter tydelig bedre: den klarer opptil 339 km, omtrent 221 km mer enn Ford Transit Connect.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Ford Transit Connect et nesten umerkelig overtak – 150 hk mot 136 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 14 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Peugeot Rifter nesten umerkelig raskere – 10.80 s mot 11.40 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.60 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Ford Transit Connect nesten umerkelig foran – den når 186 km/h, mens Peugeot Rifter stopper på 184 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 2 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Ford Transit Connect drar noe kraftigere med 350 Nm mot 300 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 50 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Seter: Peugeot Rifter tilbyr merkbar flere sitteplasser – 7 mot 5.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Ford Transit Connect lett lettere – 1477 kg mot 1561 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 84 kg.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Ford Transit Connect minimal bedre – opptil 3700 L, omtrent 200 L mer enn Peugeot Rifter.

I nyttelast vinner Peugeot Rifter knapt merkbar – 814 kg mot 792 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 22 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Ford Transit Connect seg å være vinner duellen klart og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 31 200
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09

Ford Transit Connect

  • Motortype : Diesel, Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 102 - 150 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 0.5 - 5.8 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 118 km
detaljer

Ford Transit Connect

Transit Connect er en praktisk og romslig bil som passer perfekt for både bykjøring og lengre turer. Den tilbyr en imponerende lastekapasitet og fleksible sittealternativer, noe som gjør den til et populært valg blant håndverkere og familier. Med sin moderne design og gode kjøreopplevelse er Transit Connect et pålitelig valg for de som trenger en allsidig varebil.

detaljer
98B296E7-C10F-4999-B4D2-428B46A9DF09 @ media.ford.com
2018_FORD_TRANSIT_Kombi__18 @ media.ford.com
2018_FORD_TRANSIT__12 @ media.ford.com

Peugeot Rifter

Peugeot Rifter er en praktisk og romslig familiebil med robust design og smarte løsninger som gjør hverdagslogistikken enklere. Den kjører komfortabelt, føles overraskende livlig og gir deg mye fleksibilitet uten å tømme sparegrisen.

detaljer
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP003_Aufhaenger @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP100 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP101 @ media.stellantis.com
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP207 @ media.stellantis.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Ford Transit Connect
Peugeot Rifter
Transit Connect
Rifter

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
31200 - 48400 €
Pris
27800 - 42700 €
Forbruk L/100km
0.5 - 5.8 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.6 - 6 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
18.3 - 19.1 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
118 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
328 - 339 km
Batterikapasitet
19.70 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
11 - 153 g/km
co2
0 - 158 g/km
Tankkapasitet
32 - 50 L
Tankkapasitet
50 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Varebil
Karosseri
Høy tak stasjonsvogn
Seter
2 - 5
Seter
5 - 7
Dører
4
Dører
4 - 5
Egenvekt
1477 - 1866 kg
Egenvekt
1561 - 1941 kg
Bagasjerom
-
Bagasjerom
322 - 1050 L
Lengde
4500 - 4868 mm
Lengde
4405 - 4755 mm
Bredde
1855 mm
Bredde
1848 mm
Høyde
1856 - 1860 mm
Høyde
1818 - 1837 mm
Maks bagasjerom
2500 - 3700 L
Maks bagasjerom
3000 - 3500 L
Nyttelast
602 - 792 kg
Nyttelast
489 - 814 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Diesel, Plug-in hybrid
Motortype
Elektrisk, Diesel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Reduksjonsgir, Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
102 - 150 hk
Effekt hk
102 - 136 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
11.4 - 13.5 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
10.8 - 13.6 s
Maks hastighet
175 - 186 km/h
Maks hastighet
132 - 184 km/h
Dreiemoment
280 - 350 Nm
Dreiemoment
250 - 300 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
75 - 110 kW
Effekt kW
75 - 100 kW
Slagvolum
1498 - 1968 cm3
Slagvolum
1499 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, B
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A, E, F
Merke
Ford
Merke
Peugeot

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech features that appeal to younger buyers. Ultimately, both models excel in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, making them top choices for families and urban dwellers alike.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Ford Transit Connect?

Ford Transit Connect er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.