VS

Ford Tourneo Connect vs Renault Kangoo – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Ford Tourneo Connect eller Renault Kangoo?

In the ever-evolving landscape of compact vans, the Ford Tourneo Connect and the Renault Kangoo stand out as contenders offering a versatile mix of efficiency, comfort, and advanced features. Both vehicles cater to families, businesses, and adventurers alike. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison of these two automotive stalwarts, examining their technical specifications, innovations, and overall value.

Overview of the Ford Tourneo Connect

The Ford Tourneo Connect has received a noteworthy facelift for the 2024 model year, featuring a high roof wagon body type that combines style with functionality. Under its hood, it offers a variety of engine types, including petrol, diesel, and a plug-in hybrid option. With power ratings ranging from 102 HP to a robust 150 HP, it caters to a broad spectrum of performance needs.

Technical Specifications of the Ford Tourneo Connect

Available with both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, the Tourneo Connect ensures smooth gear changes and efficient power management. Its front-wheel drive system delivers commendable traction, while the acceleration times range from 11.4 to 13.5 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, demonstrating its agility despite its larger frame.

Fuel consumption varies with engine choice, showcasing an efficient range of 5.4 to 7 L/100 km. The Tourneo Connect also offers a fuel tank capacity of 50 liters, making it suitable for longer journeys. With trunk capacities up to 1,720 liters and a maximum payload of 612 kg, practicality is a cornerstone of its design.

Innovations and Features

The 2024 Ford Tourneo Connect integrates modern innovations such as advanced driver assistance systems, connectivity features, and safety technologies. Standard features include lane-keeping assistance, adaptive cruise control, and an intuitive infotainment system that supports seamless smartphone integration.

Overview of the Renault Kangoo

The Renault Kangoo also presents itself as a robust competitor in the compact van segment. Similar in body style to the Tourneo Connect, it offers diverse engine options, including petrol, diesel, and electric variants. The electric version boasts an impressive range of up to 285 km, positioning it as an excellent choice for environmentally conscious buyers.

Technical Specifications of the Renault Kangoo

The 2024 Kangoo is equipped with manual and automatic transmission options, including dual-clutch technology. Power outputs range from 95 to 130 HP, providing a good mix of performance for both city driving and longer trips. Acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies between 11.6 to 15.6 seconds, making it competitive for daily use.

Fuel consumption statistics show the Kangoo excelling in efficiency, with figures as low as 5.2 L/100 km for its diesel options. The fuel tank can hold up to 54 liters, ensuring sufficient range for various journeys. Trunk capacity is another strong point, with options reaching up to 950 liters, making it exceptionally versatile for transporting goods or luggage.

Innovations and Features

Renault has infused the Kangoo with numerous technological advancements. Key features include a user-friendly infotainment system, multiple driving assistance options, and advanced safety features like emergency braking and hill start assist. The electric version stands out with regenerative braking technology, enhancing efficiency and battery performance.

Comparison: Ford Tourneo Connect vs Renault Kangoo

When comparing the two, the Ford Tourneo Connect leans towards a more powerful engine lineup and a slightly larger maximum payload capacity. However, the Renault Kangoo offers a superior electric variant with a longer range and better fuel efficiency for its petrol and diesel models. Both vehicles excel in trunk space, but the Kangoo has an edge in usability for daily transport tasks, thanks to its clever interior design.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the Ford Tourneo Connect and Renault Kangoo present appealing options in the compact van market. The choice between the two will ultimately depend on specific needs: whether it be the power and driving experience of the Tourneo Connect or the efficiency and electric promise of the Kangoo. Each vehicle brings unique strengths to the table, making them worthy contenders for anyone considering a reliable and versatile compact van.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk: Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Renault Kangoo har et i liten grad prisfortrinn – den starter på 26900 €, mens Ford Tourneo Connect koster 31900 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 5000 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Ford Tourneo Connect klarer seg med 0.50 L og er dermed tydelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Renault Kangoo, som bruker 5.20 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 4.70 L per 100 km.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Renault Kangoo klart merkbar bedre: Den klarer opptil 285 km, altså omtrent 166 km mer enn Ford Tourneo Connect.

Motor og ytelse: Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Ford Tourneo Connect et litt overtak – 150 hk mot 130 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 20 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Ford Tourneo Connect litt raskere – 10.10 s mot 11.60 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.50 s.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Ford Tourneo Connect minimal foran – den når 186 km/h, mens Renault Kangoo stopper på 184 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 2 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Ford Tourneo Connect drar klart synlig kraftigere med 350 Nm mot 270 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 80 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper: Familiebil eller hverdagskamerat – hvem tilbyr mest plass, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Seter: Renault Kangoo tilbyr tydelig flere sitteplasser – 7 mot 5.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Ford Tourneo Connect lett lettere – 1542 kg mot 1585 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 43 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Ford Tourneo Connect klart merkbar mer plass – 1720 L mot 950 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 770 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Ford Tourneo Connect minimal bedre – opptil 3105 L, omtrent 55 L mer enn Renault Kangoo.

Også når det gjelder nyttelast, vinner Ford Tourneo Connect påfallende – 818 kg mot 609 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 209 kg.

Alt i alt viser Ford Tourneo Connect seg å være overgår på nesten alle punkter og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Suzuki S-Cross and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their unique appeal and capabilities. While the S-Cross offers a slightly more spacious interior and a modern design, the Vitara charms with its rugged aesthetic and off-road prowess. Both models showcase Suzuki's commitment to blending practicality with efficiency, making them strong contenders for those seeking versatility in their daily drives.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.

Ford Tourneo Connect

Tourneo Connect har etablert seg som en populær valg for familier og yrkesaktive med sitt romslige interiør og fleksible sittekonfigurasjoner. Bilen kombinerer komfort med funksjonalitet, og tilbyr både rikelig plass til passasjerer og bagasje. Den moderne designen og effektive motorene gjør den til et attraktivt alternativ for de som trenger en pålitelig og variert bil til hverdagsbruk.

detaljer
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_07 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_08 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_13 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__INT_22 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__INT_31 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com

Renault Kangoo

Renault Kangoo har lenge vært en favoritt blant familier og håndverkere på grunn av sitt romslige interiør og praktiske design. Den tilbyr en imponerende fleksibilitet med flere lagringsmuligheter, noe som gjør den ideell for både hverdagsbruk og ferieturer. Med sitt brukervennlige grensesnitt og komfortable kjøreopplevelse, er Kangoo en bil som imponerer i enhver situasjon.

detaljer
r221168p @ Renault
r221165p @ Renault
r221166p @ Renault
r221163p @ Renault
r221155p @ Renault
r221162p @ Renault
Ford Tourneo Connect
Renault Kangoo
Tourneo Connect
Kangoo

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
31900 - 48900 €
Pris
26900 - 42300 €
Forbruk L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.2 - 7.1 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
116 - 119 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
278 - 285 km
Batterikapasitet
19.70 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
11 - 164 g/km
co2
0 - 161 g/km
Tankkapasitet
32 - 50 L
Tankkapasitet
54 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Høy tak stasjonsvogn
Karosseri
Høy tak stasjonsvogn
Seter
5
Seter
5 - 7
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1542 - 1781 kg
Egenvekt
1585 - 2041 kg
Bagasjerom
1213 - 1720 L
Bagasjerom
500 - 950 L
Lengde
4500 - 4868 mm
Lengde
4486 - 4911 mm
Bredde
1855 mm
Bredde
1860 - 1919 mm
Høyde
1833 mm
Høyde
1838 - 1869 mm
Maks bagasjerom
2556 - 3105 L
Maks bagasjerom
1296 - 3050 L
Nyttelast
563 - 818 kg
Nyttelast
400 - 609 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Plug-in hybrid, Bensin, Diesel
Motortype
Diesel, Bensin, Elektrisk
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Reduksjonsgir
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
102 - 150 hk
Effekt hk
95 - 130 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
10.1 - 13.5 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
11.6 - 15.6 s
Maks hastighet
175 - 186 km/h
Maks hastighet
130 - 184 km/h
Dreiemoment
220 - 350 Nm
Dreiemoment
200 - 270 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
75 - 110 kW
Effekt kW
70 - 96 kW
Slagvolum
1498 - 1968 cm3
Slagvolum
1332 - 1461 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2022 - 2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B, E, F
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, F, D, A
Merke
Ford
Merke
Renault

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross stand out in the increasingly competitive compact SUV segment, each offering a unique blend of luxury and practicality. While the LBX exudes a refined elegance with premium features and a more powerful hybrid drivetrain, the Yaris Cross appeals to budget-conscious buyers with its versatility and efficient performance. Ultimately, the choice between these two models boils down to whether you prioritize high-end comfort or value-driven functionality.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Renault Austral takes on the Renault Rafale, two standout models in Renault's latest lineup. The Austral impresses with its agile handling and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Rafale showcases a bold design and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more dynamic driving experience.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the realm of practicality and affordability, the Dacia Jogger and Dacia Bigster present two compelling options for budget-conscious families. The Jogger, with its versatile seven-seat configuration and impressive fuel efficiency, is ideal for those prioritizing everyday utility. In contrast, the upcoming Bigster is set to offer a more rugged, SUV-like aesthetic, appealing to adventurous drivers seeking a robust crossover experience without straying from Dacia's hallmark value proposition.
Er Ford Tourneo Connect tilgjengelig med ulike drivtyper?

Finnes som Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.