VS

BMW i5 vs Tesla Model S – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Enten du ser etter en bil til hverdagsbruk, familie eller lange turer – her ser du forskjellene.
Finn ut om BMW i5 eller Tesla Model S passer best til din livsstil.

BMW i5 vs. Tesla Model S: A Clash of Electric Titans

As electric vehicles continue to revolutionize the automotive landscape, the BMW i5 and Tesla Model S stand out as stellar choices for those who crave performance and innovation. Both vehicles define the zenith of what modern electric cars can offer, yet they appeal to different segments of the market. We delve deeper into their technical specifications and discover what makes each of them unique.

Performance and Power

The BMW i5 is available in various configurations, with power outputs ranging from 340 to 601 HP. It achieves 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.8 seconds, showcasing the power under its elegant hood. Its top speed reaches 230 km/h, making it a considerable contender in the world of electric sedans.

On the other hand, the Tesla Model S flaunts its remarkable acceleration capabilities with outputs of 670 to 1,020 HP, paired with an astounding 0-100 km/h time of just 2.1 seconds. It surpasses the BMW i5 in top speed, reaching up to 300 km/h. This sheer power keeps the Model S at the forefront of electric sedan performance.

Electric Range and Efficiency

When it comes to range, both of these electric marvels impress. The BMW i5 offers an electric range from 511 to 582 km, depending on the model variant and driving conditions. It achieves a consumption rate of 15.9 to 18.4 kWh/100 km, placing it in the ranks of efficiency with a sizable battery capacity of 81.2 kWh.

Meanwhile, the Tesla Model S leads the charge with ranges from 600 to 634 km before requiring a charge. Its consumption rate sits between 17.5 and 18.7 kWh/100 km, strengthening its position as a leader in long-range capabilities.

Design and Dimensions

The BMW i5 comes as a sleek sedan, measuring 5060 mm in length with modest dimensions of 1900 mm in width and a height ranging from 1505 to 1515 mm. It has a curb weight spanning from 2205 to 2380 kg, offering a trunk capacity of 490 liters, suiting those looking for substantial storage in a refined package.

In contrast, the Tesla Model S presents itself as a hatchback with dimensions of 5021 mm in length, 1987 mm in width, and a height of 1431 mm. It is lighter by a fraction, with a curb weight between 2170 and 2265 kg. The Model S surpasses the i5 with a generous trunk capacity of 793 liters, perfect for those who prioritize space.

Technological Innovations

Both cars are benchmarks of innovation. The BMW i5 integrates cutting-edge features and is driven by rear-wheel and all-wheel configurations, providing versatile performance options tailored to driver preferences. Its commitment to zero emissions positions it as a frontrunner in sustainability.

Tesla, a pioneer in innovation, outfits the Model S with its hallmark technology features and maintains an all-wheel-drive system. Known for its advanced Autopilot capabilities and over-the-air software updates, Tesla continues to lead with its technological prowess.

Final Verdict

The decision between the BMW i5 and the Tesla Model S ultimately hinges on what the driver values most. The BMW i5 presents a balance of performance, luxury, and practicality, while the Tesla Model S emphasizes raw power and cutting-edge technology. Regardless of choice, both vehicles cement their positions in the pantheon of exceptional electric sedans.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk: Pris og effektivitet er ofte de første kriteriene ved bilkjøp. Her ser man hvilken modell som lønner seg på sikt – enten det gjelder drivstoff, lading eller innkjøpspris.

BMW i5 har et tydelig prisfortrinn – den starter på 70200 €, mens Tesla Model S koster 110000 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 39790 €.

I strømforbruk har BMW i5 fordelen: med 14.70 kWh per 100 km er den i liten grad mer effektiv enn Tesla Model S, som bruker 17.50 kWh. Forskjellen er omtrent 2.80 kWh.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Tesla Model S nesten umerkelig bedre: den klarer opptil 634 km, omtrent 7 km mer enn BMW i5.

Motor og ytelse: Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Tesla Model S et klart merkbar overtak – 1020 hk mot 601 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 419 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Tesla Model S overbevisende raskere – 2.10 s mot 3.80 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.70 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Tesla Model S påfallende foran – den når 300 km/h, mens BMW i5 stopper på 230 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 70 km/h.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper: Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Tesla Model S lett lettere – 2170 kg mot 2195 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 25 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Tesla Model S merkbar mer plass – 793 L mot 490 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 303 L.

I nyttelast vinner BMW i5 klart synlig – 545 kg mot 364 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 181 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Tesla Model S seg å være dominerer sammenligningen og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 110 000
0x0-ModelS_01

Tesla Model S

  • Motortype : Elektrisk
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 670 - 1020 hk
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 17.5 - 18.7 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 600 - 634 km
detaljer

BMW i5

BMW i5 kombinerer stil og bærekraft på en imponerende måte. Med sitt elegante design og komfortable interiør, skaper denne modellen en luksuriøs kjøreopplevelse som appellerer til både den moderne sjåføren og miljøbevisste kunder. i5 er ikke bare en elektrisk bil; den representerer en ny æra innen mobilitet med fokus på innovasjon og kvalitet.

detaljer
P90506443_highRes_the-new-bmw-i5-edriv @ BMW
P90506448_highRes_the-new-bmw-i5-edriv @ BMW
P90505515_highRes_the-new-bmw-i5-m60-x @ BMW

Tesla Model S

Tesla Model S er kjent for sin imponerende rekkevidde og eleganta design, som kombinerer både stil og ytelse. Den byr på en enestående kjøreopplevelse med sitt responsive kjøreegenskaper og høyteknologiske interiør. Med sine innovative løsninger og miljøvennlige drivlinje, setter Model S standarden for fremtidens elbiler.

detaljer
0x0-ModelS_01 @ Tesla
0x0-ModelS_04 @ Tesla
0x0-ModelS_03 @ Tesla
0x0-ModelS_17 @ Tesla
0x0-ModelS_07 @ Tesla
0x0-ModelSPlaid-2 @ Tesla
0x0-ModelS_16 @ Tesla

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
BMW i5
Tesla Model S
i5
Model S

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
70200 - 99500 €
Pris
110000 - 120000 €
Forbruk L/100km
-
Forbruk L/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
14.7 - 17.1 kWh
Forbruk kWh/100km
17.5 - 18.7 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
540 - 627 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
600 - 634 km
Batterikapasitet
81.20 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Tankkapasitet
-
Tankkapasitet
-

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Sedan
Karosseri
Hatchback
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
4
Dører
5
Egenvekt
2195 - 2370 kg
Egenvekt
2170 - 2265 kg
Bagasjerom
490 L
Bagasjerom
793 L
Lengde
5060 mm
Lengde
5021 mm
Bredde
1900 mm
Bredde
1987 mm
Høyde
1505 - 1515 mm
Høyde
1431 mm
Maks bagasjerom
-
Maks bagasjerom
1828 L
Nyttelast
525 - 545 kg
Nyttelast
364 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Elektrisk
Motortype
Elektrisk
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Reduksjonsgir
Gir detalj
-
Drivtype
Bakhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
340 - 601 hk
Effekt hk
670 - 1020 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
3.8 - 6 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
2.1 - 3.2 s
Maks hastighet
193 - 230 km/h
Maks hastighet
250 - 300 km/h
Dreiemoment
430 - 820 Nm
Dreiemoment
-
Antall sylindre
-
Antall sylindre
-
Effekt kW
250 - 442 kW
Effekt kW
493 - 750 kW
Slagvolum
-
Slagvolum
-

Generelt
Modellår
2023 - 2024
Modellår
2022 - 2023
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A
Merke
BMW
Merke
Tesla

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Renault Austral takes on the Renault Rafale, two standout models in Renault's latest lineup. The Austral impresses with its agile handling and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Rafale showcases a bold design and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more dynamic driving experience.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for BMW i5?

Modellen tilbys med Bakhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.