VS

Renault Clio vs Skoda Kamiq – Hvilken modell fungerer best i hverdagen?

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Renault Clio eller Skoda Kamiq?

Clio @ renault-presse.de

Renault Clio vs Skoda Kamiq: A Comparative Look at Two Popular Models

In the competitive automotive landscape, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq stand out as appealing options for buyers seeking a blend of style, performance, and practicality. This article aims to dissect the strengths and weaknesses of both vehicles, focusing on technical specifications, innovations, and their overall market positioning.

Kamiq @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Body Type and Dimensions

The Renault Clio is a sleek hatchback measuring 4053mm in length, 1798mm in width, and 1440mm in height. Its compact dimensions make it an excellent choice for urban driving, providing agility and ease of parking.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq is classified as an SUV, offering a more robust and elevated driving position. With a length of 4241mm, width of 1793mm, and height of 1562mm, the Kamiq's dimensions contribute to its spacious interior and superior load-carrying capability.

Clio @ renault-presse.de

Engine Performance and Efficiency

When it comes to engine types, the Renault Clio offers multiple options, including a Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG variants. It delivers power outputs ranging from 67 HP in its entry-level variant to a robust 143 HP for those seeking performance. This model is highly efficient, with fuel consumption as low as 4.3 L/100km and CO2 emissions starting at 97 g/km.

On the other hand, the Skoda Kamiq exclusively features petrol engines, with power output options between 95 HP to a powerful 150 HP. While it falls slightly behind in fuel efficiency with a consumption ranging from 5.4 to 5.7 L/100km, it still offers a respectable performance and CO2 emissions of 121 to 130 g/km, depending on the variant chosen.

Kamiq @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Transmission and Driving Experience

The Renault Clio provides a versatile transmission lineup, including an automatic gearbox, manual gearbox, and CVT options. Its driving dynamics are enhanced by front-wheel drive, offering a spirited driving experience, especially for urban maneuverability.

Conversely, the Skoda Kamiq uses a dual-clutch automatic transmission alongside manual options, enhancing its performance and giving a sportier feel during drive. Both models offer a front-wheel-drive configuration, which contributes to their agility on the road.

Clio @ renault-presse.de

Acceleration and Maximum Speed

Acceleration from 0-100 km/h reveals the performance strengths of both vehicles. The Clio boasts an impressive range, with some variants hitting 100 km/h in as quick as 9.3 seconds, making it a fun choice for those who appreciate spirited driving.

The Skoda Kamiq doesn’t lag far behind, with its swiftest variant achieving the same speed in just 8.3 seconds. Furthermore, the Kamiq can reach a top speed of up to 214 km/h, compared to Clio's maximum of 174 km/h in the fastest version.

Kamiq @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Interior Space and Comfort

While being a hatchback, the Renault Clio offers adequate space for up to five passengers, with a trunk capacity of 301 L. The cabin is designed with comfort in mind, making it a practical choice for everyday use.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq excels in interior space and practicality, with a trunk capacity of 400 L, further emphasizing its SUV credentials. Both vehicles have room for five passengers, but the Kamiq’s generous dimensions provide an airy and spacious cabin for all occupants.

Technology and Innovations

Modern technology is essential in today’s vehicles, and both models deliver in this aspect. The Renault Clio is equipped with an advanced infotainment system offering smartphone connectivity, navigation, and a host of driver assistance features designed to enhance safety and convenience.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq does not shy away from technology either, offering its own space-efficient infotainment system featuring similar driver aids alongside a digital cockpit that heightens the driving experience. The Kamiq also boasts several innovative storage solutions, a hallmark feature of the Skoda brand.

Conclusion: Which One Suits Your Needs?

In summary, the Renault Clio and Skoda Kamiq both offer compelling packages in their respective segments. The Clio shines in its performance and urban agility, making it a favorite amongst city drivers. Conversely, the Kamiq stands out with its SUV stature, offering increased space and practicality for families or longer journeys.

Your choice ultimately depends on your personal requirements and lifestyle. If you are drawn to sporty dynamics and a compact design, the Clio is a solid contender. However, if you require more space and versatile features in an SUV format, the Kamiq may be the better fit. Whichever you choose, both vehicles emerge as fantastic options on the modern automotive market, catering to a wide array of customers.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Renault Clio har et merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 19400 €, mens Skoda Kamiq koster 25300 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 5980 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Renault Clio klarer seg med 4.30 L og er dermed tydelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Skoda Kamiq, som bruker 5.30 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 1 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Skoda Kamiq et nesten umerkelig overtak – 150 hk mot 143 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 7 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Skoda Kamiq en smule raskere – 8.10 s mot 9.30 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.20 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Skoda Kamiq en smule foran – den når 216 km/h, mens Renault Clio stopper på 174 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 42 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Skoda Kamiq drar noe kraftigere med 250 Nm mot 205 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 45 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Familiebil eller hverdagskamerat – hvem tilbyr mest plass, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Renault Clio lett lettere – 1124 kg mot 1231 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 107 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Skoda Kamiq nesten umerkelig mer plass – 400 L mot 391 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 9 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Skoda Kamiq påfallende bedre – opptil 1395 L, omtrent 326 L mer enn Renault Clio.

I nyttelast vinner Skoda Kamiq tydelig – 539 kg mot 406 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 133 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Skoda Kamiq seg å være ligger litt foran og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 25 300
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819

Skoda Kamiq

  • Motortype : Bensin
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 95 - 150 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L
detaljer

Renault Clio

Renault Clio er en kvikk og sjarmerende bybil som føles større enn den ser ut, med et lekent vesen som gjør hver bytur til litt mer moro. Innvendig byr den på gjennomtenkte løsninger og et moderne uttrykk, en smart følgesvenn for dem som vil ha stil og praktisk hverdagsglede uten fuss.

detaljer
r212202p @ renault-presse.de
r212188p @ renault-presse.de
r212211p @ renault-presse.de

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)
vurder

Skoda Kamiq er en kvikk og praktisk crossover som takler bykjøring og helgeturer med en overraskende romslighet og gjennomtenkte løsninger. Den sitter komfortabelt på veien, gir god oversikt og holder lommeboka fornøyd — kort sagt en smart hverdagsbil uten unødvendig fjas.

detaljer
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Renault Clio
Skoda Kamiq
Clio
Kamiq

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
19400 - 26800 €
Pris
25300 - 37300 €
Forbruk L/100km
4.3 - 5.3 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
0.60 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
97 - 121 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Tankkapasitet
39 - 42 L
Tankkapasitet
50 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Hatchback
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1124 - 1331 kg
Egenvekt
1231 - 1340 kg
Bagasjerom
301 - 391 L
Bagasjerom
400 L
Lengde
4053 mm
Lengde
4241 mm
Bredde
1798 mm
Bredde
1793 mm
Høyde
1440 mm
Høyde
1562 mm
Maks bagasjerom
979 - 1069 L
Maks bagasjerom
1395 L
Nyttelast
398 - 406 kg
Nyttelast
439 - 539 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Full hybrid, Bensin
Motortype
Bensin
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
67 - 143 hk
Effekt hk
95 - 150 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.3 - 17.1 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.1 - 11 s
Maks hastighet
160 - 174 km/h
Maks hastighet
183 - 216 km/h
Dreiemoment
95 - 205 Nm
Dreiemoment
175 - 250 Nm
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
49 - 105 kW
Effekt kW
70 - 110 kW
Slagvolum
999 - 1598 cm3
Slagvolum
999 - 1498 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2023 - 2025
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, D
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D
Merke
Renault
Merke
Skoda

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech features that appeal to younger buyers. Ultimately, both models excel in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, making them top choices for families and urban dwellers alike.
Er Renault Clio tilgjengelig med ulike drivtyper?

Modellen tilbys med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.