VS

Omoda 5 vs Skoda Kamiq – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Omoda 5 eller Skoda Kamiq?

Unveiling the Titans: Omoda 5 vs. Skoda Kamiq Comparison

In the dynamic world of SUVs, the Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq stand out as two formidable contenders. Both models offer a combination of modern engineering and innovative features, but which one holds the edge? Let's delve into a detailed comparison, exploring their technical specifications and innovative design elements.

Power and Performance

The Omoda 5 is known for its powerful performance, boasting a robust 1.6-liter engine that delivers 204 horsepower (HP) and 145 kW of power. It accelerates from 0-100 km/h in just 7.8 seconds and achieves a top speed of 220 km/h. This makes it a spirited choice for drivers seeking a dynamic ride.

Contrastingly, the Skoda Kamiq presents a range of engine options, with power outputs ranging from 95 HP to 150 HP, depending on the variant chosen. The acceleration from 0-100 km/h varies between 8.3 to 11 seconds, while the top speed peaks at 214 km/h. While less powerful than the Omoda 5, the Kamiq offers versatility and efficiency suited for varied driving styles.

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel efficiency plays a crucial role in modern automotive design. The Omoda 5 consumes approximately 7.5 L/100km. Although it delivers impressive power, its consumption may be a consideration for those focused on fuel savings.

In contrast, the Skoda Kamiq provides better fuel efficiency with options ranging between 5.4 L/100km to 5.7 L/100km. Moreover, the Kamiq boasts a CO2 efficiency class D and CO2 emissions starting from 121 g/km, making it a favorable option for environmentally conscious drivers.

Dimensions and Design

Both the Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq fall within the compact SUV category. The Omoda 5 measures 4,424 mm in length, 1,830 mm in width, and 1,588 mm in height, offering a spacious interior with five seats.

The Skoda Kamiq is slightly more compact with dimensions of 4,241 mm in length, 1,793 mm in width, and 1,562 mm in height. Despite its smaller size, it provides an ample trunk capacity of 400 L, compared to the Omoda 5’s lesser trunk space. Design-wise, both vehicles encapsulate modern aesthetics tailored to urban environments.

Innovative Features

Technology and innovation are at the forefront of both models. The Omoda 5 features a dual-clutch automatic transmission, ensuring smooth gear transitions and enhancing driving dynamics. Its cutting-edge features cater to tech-savvy individuals seeking a contemporary driving experience.

The Skoda Kamiq offers flexibility with both manual and automatic transmission options. It integrates state-of-the-art infotainment systems and advanced driver-assistance capabilities, presenting a wide array of options for drivers prioritizing convenience and safety.

Conclusion: The Choice is Yours

The Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq each have their own merits. The Omoda 5 is ideal for those who prioritize performance and power, while the Skoda Kamiq stands out for its fuel efficiency and practical design. Ultimately, the choice between these two depends on driving preferences, lifestyle needs, and desired innovations.

As the SUV landscape evolves, choosing between the Omoda 5 and Skoda Kamiq is a decision influenced by a dynamic blend of performance, efficiency, and modernity. Whichever you choose, you're acquiring a vehicle that embodies the spirit of contemporary automotive excellence.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Skoda Kamiq har et minimal prisfortrinn – den starter på 25300 €, mens Omoda 5 koster 27000 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 1670 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Skoda Kamiq klarer seg med 5.30 L og er dermed tydelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Omoda 5, som bruker 7.50 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 2.20 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Omoda 5 et påfallende overtak – 204 hk mot 150 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 54 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Omoda 5 nesten umerkelig raskere – 7.80 s mot 8.10 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.30 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Omoda 5 lett foran – den når 220 km/h, mens Skoda Kamiq stopper på 216 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 4 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Omoda 5 drar litt kraftigere med 290 Nm mot 250 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 40 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Skoda Kamiq klart merkbar mer plass – 400 L mot 0 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 400 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Skoda Kamiq klart synlig bedre – opptil 1395 L, omtrent 320 L mer enn Omoda 5.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Skoda Kamiq seg å være gir konkurrenten liten sjanse og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 25 300
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819

Skoda Kamiq

  • Motortype : Bensin
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 95 - 150 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 5.3 - 5.7 L
detaljer

Omoda 5

Den nye BMW i5 kombinerer stil og bærekraft på en imponerende måte. Med sitt elegante design og romslige interiør tilbyr den både komfort og teknologi i en harmonisk pakke. Kjøreopplevelsen er sømløs og responsiv, noe som gjør i5 til et utmerket valg for både bykjøring og lange turer.

detaljer

Skoda Kamiq

5 (2)
vurder

Skoda Kamiq er en kvikk og praktisk crossover som takler bykjøring og helgeturer med en overraskende romslighet og gjennomtenkte løsninger. Den sitter komfortabelt på veien, gir god oversikt og holder lommeboka fornøyd — kort sagt en smart hverdagsbil uten unødvendig fjas.

detaljer
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688 @ Skoda Presse Deutschland

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Omoda 5
Skoda Kamiq
Kamiq

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
27000 €
Pris
25300 - 37300 €
Forbruk L/100km
7.50 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
-
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Tankkapasitet
51 L
Tankkapasitet
50 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
-
Egenvekt
1231 - 1340 kg
Bagasjerom
0 L
Bagasjerom
400 L
Lengde
4424 mm
Lengde
4241 mm
Bredde
1830 mm
Bredde
1793 mm
Høyde
1588 mm
Høyde
1562 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1075 L
Maks bagasjerom
1395 L
Nyttelast
-
Nyttelast
439 - 539 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin
Motortype
Bensin
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
204 hk
Effekt hk
95 - 150 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.80 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.1 - 11 s
Maks hastighet
220 km/h
Maks hastighet
183 - 216 km/h
Dreiemoment
290 Nm
Dreiemoment
175 - 250 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
145 kW
Effekt kW
70 - 110 kW
Slagvolum
1598 cm3
Slagvolum
999 - 1498 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
-
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D
Merke
Omoda
Merke
Skoda

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Omoda 5?

Finnes som Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.