VS

MG ZS vs Lynk & Co 01 – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

To biler, én duell: MG ZS møter Lynk & Co 01.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

MG ZS vs Lynk & Co 01: SUV Showdown

In the rapidly evolving landscape of SUVs, two models stand out with their distinct approaches to performance, efficiency, and technology: the MG ZS and the Lynk & Co 01. Both offer a compelling mix of features and innovations, yet cater to different preferences and priorities. Here’s how they stack up against each other.

Efficiency and Performance: A Look Under the Hood

The MG ZS provides a versatile range of powertrains, including electric, full hybrid, and petrol engines. The electric variant boasts an impressive battery capacity of up to 65.7 kWh, delivering a range of 440 km, which is noteworthy in its class. The compact SUV exhibits power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 197 HP, with a maximum torque of 280 Nm, and can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 8.6 to 8.7 seconds.

In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01 utilizes a plugin hybrid system that generates between 261 HP to 276 HP and torque figures of between 425 and 535 Nm. It offers an electric-only range of 75 km, thanks to its 14.1 kWh battery, making it highly efficient with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100 km in hybrid mode. Its dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures a smoother and more efficient driving experience with a top speed reaching up to 210 km/h and an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 7.7 to 8 seconds.

Design, Space, and Comfort

On the exterior, the MG ZS measures between 4323 to 4430 mm in length, 1809 to 1818 mm in width, and 1635 to 1649 mm in height. With a trunk capacity between 443 and 448 liters, it offers ample space for everyday use, further complemented by its seating for five passengers.

The Lynk & Co 01 is slightly larger, measuring between 4541 to 4545 mm in length, 1857 to 1860 mm in width, and 1694 mm in height. It offers a slightly larger trunk capacity of 466 liters. The interior is marked by a modern design focus, comfortably seating five passengers.

Sustainability and Emissions

Both SUVs cater to environmentally conscious consumers but do so differently. The MG ZS can boast zero emissions in its fully electric variant. In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01, a plugin hybrid, achieves impressively low emissions, remaining below 24 g/km of CO2, thanks to its efficient hybrid setup.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Ideal SUV

The choice between the MG ZS and the Lynk & Co 01 hinges on your priorities. If you’re seeking a transition towards electric mobility, the MG ZS’s fully electric variant is appealing with its extensive range and zero emissions. Alternatively, the Lynk & Co 01 presents a balanced approach with its plugin hybrid system, providing both efficiency and potent performance.

Both models showcase the shift towards more sustainable automotive solutions while offering distinct features tailored to different consumer needs. Whether it’s the versatile efficiency of the MG ZS or the performance-oriented design of the Lynk & Co 01, each SUV brings its own strengths to the table.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk: Pris og effektivitet er ofte områdene med de tydeligste forskjellene. Her avgjøres det ofte hvilken bil som passer best til budsjettet over tid.

MG ZS har et betydelig prisfortrinn – den starter på 21000 €, mens Lynk & Co 01 koster 43000 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 22005 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Lynk & Co 01 klarer seg med 0.90 L og er dermed klart merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn MG ZS, som bruker 5 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 4.10 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse: Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Lynk & Co 01 et tydelig overtak – 276 hk mot 197 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 79 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Lynk & Co 01 i liten grad raskere – 7.70 s mot 8.70 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Lynk & Co 01 noe foran – den når 200 km/h, mens MG ZS stopper på 179 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 21 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Lynk & Co 01 drar betydelig kraftigere med 535 Nm mot 148 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 387 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper: Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er MG ZS betydelig lettere – 1330 kg mot 1935 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 605 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Lynk & Co 01 minimal mer plass – 466 L mot 443 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 23 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer MG ZS litt bedre – opptil 1457 L, omtrent 244 L mer enn Lynk & Co 01.

I nyttelast vinner MG ZS litt – 470 kg mot 415 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 55 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Lynk & Co 01 seg å være overgår på nesten alle punkter og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 43 000
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870

Lynk & Co 01

  • Motortype : Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 276 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 0.90 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 75 km
detaljer

MG ZS

5 (1)
vurder

MG ZS har imponert med sitt moderne design og romslige interiør, som gjør den til et attraktivt valg for familier. Med en fokus på både komfort og kjøreglede, er denne SUV-en perfekt for både bykjøring og lengre turer. Det er vanskelig å motstå MG ZS sin kombinasjon av stil og funksjonalitet, som appellerer til en bred gruppe bilkjøpere.

detaljer
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07 @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21 @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Lynk & Co 01

Den nye Volkswagen ID.4 setter en ny standard for elektriske SUV-er med sitt moderne design og imponerende rekkevidde. Interiøret kombinerer komfort med smart teknologi, noe som gir en behagelig kjøreopplevelse. Med fokus på bærekraftighet er denne bilen et godt valg for miljøbevisste sjåfører.

detaljer
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870 @ press.lynkco.com
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770 @ press.lynkco.com
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868 @ press.lynkco.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
MG ZS
Lynk & Co 01
ZS
01

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
21000 - 27000 €
Pris
43000 - 47000 €
Forbruk L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Forbruk L/100km
0.90 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
75 km
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
113 - 145 g/km
co2
20 g/km
Tankkapasitet
41 - 55 L
Tankkapasitet
42 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1330 - 1420 kg
Egenvekt
1935 kg
Bagasjerom
443 L
Bagasjerom
466 L
Lengde
4430 mm
Lengde
4545 mm
Bredde
1818 mm
Bredde
1860 mm
Høyde
1635 mm
Høyde
1694 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1457 L
Maks bagasjerom
1213 L
Nyttelast
375 - 470 kg
Nyttelast
415 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Full hybrid, Bensin
Motortype
Plug-in hybrid
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
116 - 197 hk
Effekt hk
276 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.7 - 12.5 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.70 s
Maks hastighet
168 - 179 km/h
Maks hastighet
200 km/h
Dreiemoment
148 Nm
Dreiemoment
535 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
85 - 145 kW
Effekt kW
206 kW
Slagvolum
1495 - 1498 cm3
Slagvolum
1499 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, E
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B
Merke
MG
Merke
Lynk & Co

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Renault Austral takes on the Renault Rafale, two standout models in Renault's latest lineup. The Austral impresses with its agile handling and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Rafale showcases a bold design and advanced technology, appealing to those seeking a more dynamic driving experience.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for MG ZS?

MG ZS er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.