VS

Kia Ceed vs Mazda CX-30 – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Sammenlign ytelse, bagasjerom, forbruk og pris på et øyeblikk.
Finn ut hvilken bil som er det beste valget for deg – Kia Ceed eller Mazda CX-30?

Ceed @ press.kia.com

The Hatchback vs. The SUV: A Closer Look at the Kia Ceed and Mazda CX-30

In the world of compact cars, the Kia Ceed and the Mazda CX-30 present two distinct yet compelling options for buyers in 2024. With both vehicles offering innovative technology and performance-oriented specs, there is much to compare and contrast. While the Kia Ceed takes on the persona of a reliable hatchback, the Mazda CX-30 enters with the heightened stance and practicality of an SUV.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Engine Power and Performance

The Kia Ceed, available with both Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) and traditional petrol engines, offers a versatile driving experience. With power outputs ranging from 100 to 140 HP and a torque spectrum of 172 to 253 Nm, it's designed for efficient city driving. The Ceed accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a span ranging from 9.5 to 13.2 seconds depending on the variant, and reaches top speeds between 178 and 197 km/h.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30, exclusively using MHEV technology, offers a more powerful performance with its options of 140 and 186 HP. Its torque rests steadily around 238 to 240 Nm. The CX-30 accelerates to 100 km/h from a standstill in as little as 8.3 seconds, proving a bit sportier than its hatchback competitor. The max speed measures up to 204 km/h, providing a satisfying edge for enthusiasts.

Ceed @ press.kia.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to efficiency, the Kia Ceed consumes between 6.0 to 6.4 L/100km, placing it in CO2 Efficiency Class E with emissions between 137 to 146 g/km. Its curb weight varies from 1298 to 1390 kg and comes with a fuel tank capacity of 50 liters, ensuring reasonable range and practicality.

In comparison, the Mazda CX-30 is slightly more efficient, with fuel consumption varying from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km. It falls mainly within CO2 Efficiency Classes D and E, emitting 129 to 148 g/km, thanks to its advanced MHEV system. The CX-30’s weight ranges from 1455 to 1587 kg, and it can hold between 48 and 51 liters of fuel.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Practicality

Space is always a priority for buyers seeking comfort and utility. The Kia Ceed offers a trunk capacity of 357 to 395 liters, with overall dimensions measuring 4315 to 4325 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a low roofline at 1442 to 1447 mm, reflecting its sleek appearance. The hatchback design further accentuates its accessibility.

In terms of practicality, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a superior trunk capacity at 422 to 430 liters, a testament to its SUV body style. With an exterior measuring 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide, and standing taller at 1540 mm, it affords a commanding presence on the road along with enhanced passenger comfort.

Ceed @ press.kia.com

Conclusion: Choose Your Adventure

The choice between the Kia Ceed and the Mazda CX-30 revolves around preferences for body style, performance needs, and lifestyle. While the Ceed might appeal to those seeking a nimble, city-friendly machine, the CX-30 suits individuals desiring a spirited drive with SUV practicality. Both models affirm their brand’s commitment to quality, innovation, and driving pleasure for the modern era.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte de første kriteriene ved bilkjøp. Her ser man hvilken modell som lønner seg på sikt – enten det gjelder drivstoff, lading eller innkjøpspris.

Kia Ceed har et knapt merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 27400 €, mens Mazda CX-30 koster 29400 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 2050 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Mazda CX-30 klarer seg med 5.70 L og er dermed lett mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Kia Ceed, som bruker 6 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.30 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Mazda CX-30 et merkbar overtak – 186 hk mot 140 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 46 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Mazda CX-30 en smule raskere – 8.30 s mot 9.50 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.20 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Mazda CX-30 knapt merkbar foran – den når 204 km/h, mens Kia Ceed stopper på 197 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 7 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Kia Ceed drar knapt merkbar kraftigere med 253 Nm mot 240 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 13 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Kia Ceed i liten grad lettere – 1298 kg mot 1455 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 157 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Mazda CX-30 knapt merkbar mer plass – 430 L mot 395 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 35 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Mazda CX-30 knapt merkbar bedre – opptil 1406 L, omtrent 115 L mer enn Kia Ceed.

I nyttelast vinner Mazda CX-30 nesten umerkelig – 496 kg mot 490 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 6 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Mazda CX-30 viser seg å være er overlegen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Mazda CX-30 som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 29 400
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 140 - 186 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
detaljer

Kia Ceed

Kia Ceed er en smart og velbalansert kompaktbil som gir mer enn forventet for pengene, med moderne design og en praktisk innredning som takler hverdagslivet uten drama. Den kjører trygt og komfortabelt på norske veier, samtidig som den føles frisk nok til å gjøre pendlingen litt mer underholdende enn nødvendig.

detaljer
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_01 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_02 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ2023_Innen @ press.kia.com

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
vurder

Mazda CX-30 pakker et elegant utseende og en overraskende leken kjørefølelse inn i en praktisk pakke som passer like godt til bykjøring som til helgetur. Interiøret er nøye gjennomtenkt og gir deg en premiumfølelse uten å tømme sparegrisen — en smart og sjarmerende bil for den som vil ha både stil og kjøreglede.

detaljer
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Kia Ceed
Mazda CX-30
Ceed
CX-30

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
27400 - 30700 €
Pris
29400 - 42900 €
Forbruk L/100km
6 - 6.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
137 - 146 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Tankkapasitet
50 L
Tankkapasitet
48 - 51 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Hatchback
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1298 - 1372 kg
Egenvekt
1455 - 1587 kg
Bagasjerom
357 - 395 L
Bagasjerom
422 - 430 L
Lengde
4315 mm
Lengde
4395 mm
Bredde
1800 mm
Bredde
1795 mm
Høyde
1447 mm
Høyde
1540 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1253 - 1291 L
Maks bagasjerom
1398 - 1406 L
Nyttelast
478 - 490 kg
Nyttelast
458 - 496 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin, Bensin MHEV
Motortype
Bensin MHEV
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
100 - 140 hk
Effekt hk
140 - 186 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.5 - 13.2 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.3 - 10.3 s
Maks hastighet
178 - 197 km/h
Maks hastighet
191 - 204 km/h
Dreiemoment
172 - 253 Nm
Dreiemoment
238 - 240 Nm
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
74 - 103 kW
Effekt kW
103 - 137 kW
Slagvolum
998 - 1482 cm3
Slagvolum
1998 - 2488 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E
Merke
Kia
Merke
Mazda

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Kia Ceed?

Kia Ceed er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.