VS

Kia Ceed Sportswagon vs Opel Astra Sports Tourer – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Enten du ser etter en bil til hverdagsbruk, familie eller lange turer – her ser du forskjellene.
Finn ut om Kia Ceed Sportswagon eller Opel Astra Sports Tourer passer best til din livsstil.

Ceed Sportswagon @ press.kia.com

When it comes to finding the perfect family car, the wagon segment is a strong contender for blending practicality with style. Two of the most prominent models in this category are the Kia Ceed Sportswagon and the Opel Astra Sports Tourer. Both vehicles boast innovative technology and robust performance, but how do they compare? Let's dive into their specifications, features, and unique offerings to help you make an informed decision.

Astra Sports Tourer @ media.stellantis.com

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Ceed Sportswagon measures 4605 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and has a height ranging from 1422 mm to 1465 mm. It's designed for functionality without sacrificing aesthetics, offering a sleek profile and a spacious interior suitable for families.

On the other hand, the Opel Astra Sports Tourer is slightly larger, with dimensions of 4642 mm in length and 1860 mm in width, giving it a more substantial presence on the road. With a height of 1443 mm to 1481 mm, it also aims to provide ample headroom for passengers, making it a comfortable choice for longer journeys.

Ceed Sportswagon @ press.kia.com

Engine Options and Performance

The Kia Ceed Sportswagon offers versatile engine choices, including a petrol mild hybrid and standard petrol engines. The maximum power output ranges from 100 HP for the lower models to a robust 140 HP for the more powerful variants. Fuel efficiency is commendable, ranging from 6.0 to 6.4 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions between 137 to 146 g/km. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h can be achieved in as little as 9.7 seconds depending on the engine variant.

Conversely, the Astra Sports Tourer has a broader range of engine types, including petrol, diesel, and even electric options, establishing it as a more flexible choice. Power outputs vary significantly, from 110 HP in the entry-level model to an impressive 225 HP in the top-of-the-line variant. Fuel consumption is competitive, with rates as low as 5.1 L/100 km, and CO2 emissions range from 0 g/km for the electric model to 134 g/km for the petrol engines. Acceleration figures demonstrate its performance capabilities, with the fastest variants reaching 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.6 seconds.

Astra Sports Tourer @ media.stellantis.com

Transmission and Drive Type

Both vehicles offer a choice of manual and automatic transmissions, enhancing the driving experience. The Kia Ceed opts for a dual-clutch automatic transmission, which provides smooth gear shifts and greater efficiency.

The Astra Sports Tourer provides similar options, with a dual-clutch automatic system and other manual gearbox configurations. It maintains a front-wheel-drive system across all variants, promising stable handling and responsiveness in various driving conditions.

Ceed Sportswagon @ press.kia.com

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both wagons are designed with family comfort in mind. The Kia Ceed Sportswagon can accommodate five passengers with ample rear passenger space and a trunk capacity ranging from 512 to 625 liters, easily swallowing bulky items.

The Astra Sports Tourer matches this practicality, with a trunk capacity of 516 to 597 liters, making it slightly more accommodating depending on configuration. The interior of the Astra also benefits from modern technological advancements, featuring the latest infotainment systems and driver assistance features.

Astra Sports Tourer @ media.stellantis.com

Safety Features

Safety is a paramount concern for both Kia and Opel. The Ceed Sportswagon is equipped with several driver assistance features like lane-keeping assist and advanced airbags. Kia's recent models also boast good crash test ratings, enhancing peace of mind for families.

In comparison, the Astra Sports Tourer shines with its advanced safety technology, incorporating features such as automatic emergency braking, adaptive cruise control, and a plethora of sensors to enhance road safety. This emphasis on safety can make it a preferred choice for those prioritizing security in their driving experience.

Ceed Sportswagon @ press.kia.com

Conclusion

Choosing between the Kia Ceed Sportswagon and the Opel Astra Sports Tourer ultimately boils down to personal preference and specific needs. The Ceed offers an excellent balance of performance, technology, and spaciousness, while the Astra steps it up with a wider range of engine options and more advanced safety features. Both models are well-equipped to satisfy the needs of modern families, making either a worthy consideration for anyone in the market for a wagon.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte de første kriteriene ved bilkjøp. Her ser man hvilken modell som lønner seg på sikt – enten det gjelder drivstoff, lading eller innkjøpspris.

Kia Ceed Sportswagon har et knapt merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 28400 €, mens Opel Astra Sports Tourer koster 30900 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 2500 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Opel Astra Sports Tourer klarer seg med 2.30 L og er dermed overbevisende mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Kia Ceed Sportswagon, som bruker 6 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 3.70 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Opel Astra Sports Tourer et påfallende overtak – 225 hk mot 140 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 85 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Opel Astra Sports Tourer tydelig raskere – 7.60 s mot 9.70 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 2.10 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Opel Astra Sports Tourer litt foran – den når 235 km/h, mens Kia Ceed Sportswagon stopper på 197 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 38 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Opel Astra Sports Tourer drar klart synlig kraftigere med 360 Nm mot 253 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 107 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Kia Ceed Sportswagon minimal lettere – 1335 kg mot 1394 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 59 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Kia Ceed Sportswagon lett mer plass – 625 L mot 597 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 28 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Kia Ceed Sportswagon knapt merkbar bedre – opptil 1694 L, omtrent 60 L mer enn Opel Astra Sports Tourer.

I nyttelast vinner Opel Astra Sports Tourer nesten umerkelig – 497 kg mot 485 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 12 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Opel Astra Sports Tourer viser seg å være er overlegen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Opel Astra Sports Tourer som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 30 900
02_opel_astra_sports_tourer_plugin_hybrid_519435-630f46d50e605

Opel Astra Sports Tourer

  • Motortype : Bensin, Diesel, Elektrisk, Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 130 - 225 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 2.3 - 6.1 L
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 15.60 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 81 - 413 km
detaljer

Kia Ceed Sportswagon

Kia Ceed Sportswagon kombinerer stil og funksjonalitet på en imponerende måte, noe som gjør den til et utmerket valg for familier og eventyrere. Med sitt romslige bagasjerom og komfortable interiør, tilbyr den rikelig med plass for både passasjerer og utstyr. Den moderne designen og avanserte teknologi gjør kjøreopplevelsen både trygg og tilfredsstillende.

detaljer
Kia_Ceed_Sportswagon_MJ19_Dyn_09 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_Sportswagon_MJ19_Dyn_12 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_Sportswagon_MJ19_Dyn_17 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_Sportswagon_MJ19_Int_17 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_Sportswagon_MJ19_Int_06 @ press.kia.com

Opel Astra Sports Tourer

Astra Sports Tourer kombinerer elegant design med praktisk plass, noe som gjør den til et utmerket valg for både bykjøring og lange kjøreturer. Interiøret imponerer med moderne teknologi og høy komfort, noe som sikrer en behagelig opplevelse for både sjåfør og passasjerer. Med sin allsidighet og stil er Astra Sports Tourer en bil som kan møte mange livsstiler.

detaljer
02_opel_astra_sports_tourer_plugin_hybrid_519435-630f46d50e605 @ media.stellantis.com
04_opel_astra_sports_tourer_plugin_hybrid_519427-630f46c095b3a @ media.stellantis.com
08_opel_astra_sports_tourer_519396-630f469c10009 @ media.stellantis.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
Opel Astra Sports Tourer
Ceed Sportswagon
Astra Sports Tourer

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
28400 - 34000 €
Pris
30900 - 48800 €
Forbruk L/100km
6 - 6.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
2.3 - 6.1 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
15.60 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
81 - 413 km
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
51 kWh
co2
137 - 146 g/km
co2
0 - 137 g/km
Tankkapasitet
50 L
Tankkapasitet
42 - 52 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Stasjonsvogn
Karosseri
Stasjonsvogn
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1335 - 1437 kg
Egenvekt
1394 - 1760 kg
Bagasjerom
512 - 625 L
Bagasjerom
516 - 597 L
Lengde
4605 mm
Lengde
4642 mm
Bredde
1800 mm
Bredde
1860 mm
Høyde
1422 - 1465 mm
Høyde
1443 - 1481 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1545 - 1694 L
Maks bagasjerom
1553 - 1634 L
Nyttelast
455 - 485 kg
Nyttelast
413 - 497 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin, Bensin MHEV
Motortype
Bensin, Diesel, Elektrisk, Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse, Reduksjonsgir, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
100 - 140 hk
Effekt hk
130 - 225 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.7 - 13.5 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.6 - 11 s
Maks hastighet
178 - 197 km/h
Maks hastighet
170 - 235 km/h
Dreiemoment
172 - 253 Nm
Dreiemoment
230 - 360 Nm
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
74 - 103 kW
Effekt kW
96 - 165 kW
Slagvolum
998 - 1482 cm3
Slagvolum
1199 - 1598 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2023 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E, A, C, B
Merke
Kia
Merke
Opel

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Er Kia Ceed Sportswagon tilgjengelig med ulike drivtyper?

Kia Ceed Sportswagon er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.