VS

Jeep Compass vs MINI Countryman – Hvilken bil er det beste valget?

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Jeep Compass eller MINI Countryman?

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Introduction: Jeep Compass vs MINI Countryman

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the competition remains fierce, with manufacturers consistently innovating to attract new buyers. Among these, the Jeep Compass and the MINI Countryman stand out for their unique blend of style, performance, and functionality. This article dives into a detailed comparison of these two models, examining their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall appeal.

Countryman @ press.bmwgroup.com

Design and Dimensions

The Jeep Compass presents a rugged exterior with traditional Jeep styling, featuring a striking front grille and muscular body lines that emphasize its off-road capabilities. It measures 4404 mm in length, 1819 mm in width, and has a height of 1629 mm, offering a robust stance combined with a spacious interior for up to five passengers.

On the other hand, the MINI Countryman offers a more refined and playful design, echoing the brand's iconic aesthetic while providing the utility of an SUV. It comes in at approximately 4444 mm to 4447 mm in length, 1843 mm in width, and heights ranging from 1635 mm to 1661 mm. Although slightly larger, the Countryman maintains the compact charm that MINI is known for.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Engine Options and Performance

Under the hood, both the Jeep Compass and MINI Countryman provide a range of engine options tailored to different driving preferences. The Compass features petrol MHEV and Plugin Hybrid engines, delivering power outputs from 130 HP up to 240 HP. Its 2.0-liter engine variants, especially the one with 240 HP, accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds, while offering fuel consumptions as low as 2 L/100 km in hybrid mode.

The MINI Countryman, equally versatile, offers a broader range of engines including petrol MHEV, diesel MHEV, and an electric option. Power outputs range from 163 HP to a thrilling 313 HP in the John Cooper Works variant. With acclaimed performance figures, the Countryman can sprint from 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.4 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials while still maintaining efficient fuel consumption rates of 4.6 to 6.7 L/100 km depending on the engine choice.

Countryman @ press.bmwgroup.com

Innovative Features and Technology

As for technological innovations, both models incorporate advanced features aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The Jeep Compass includes a user-friendly infotainment system with an intuitive touchscreen interface, smartphone integration, and advanced navigation capabilities typical of modern SUVs.

The MINI Countryman, famous for its tech-savvy approach, boasts a digital cockpit that integrates a high-definition display and a customizable interface. Additionally, it offers tech-driven safety features such as adaptive cruise control, parking assistance, and real-time traffic updates, setting a benchmark in connectivity and convenience.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Interior Comfort and Cargo Space

When it comes to the interior, both the Jeep Compass and MINI Countryman prioritize comfort and space. The Compass offers an impressive trunk capacity of 438 to 420 liters, making it suitable for family outings and road trips. Its spacious cabin, characterized by high-quality materials, ensures a comfortable ride for all passengers.

Meanwhile, the Countryman takes it a step further with a trunk space ranging from 450 to 505 liters, allowing for augmented storage capabilities without compromising passenger comfort. Its distinct MINIMALIST interior design, paired with luxurious materials, creates an inviting atmosphere that complements its performance-oriented nature.

Countryman @ press.bmwgroup.com

Conclusion: Choosing Between the Compass and Countryman

Ultimately, the choice between the Jeep Compass and MINI Countryman boils down to personal preference and priorities. If rugged capability and off-road prowess are at the top of your list, the Compass presents a compelling option with its superior power and robust design. Alternatively, for those seeking a premium feel combined with spirited performance and contemporary technology, the Countryman delivers an alluring package that excels in urban settings.

As both models continue to evolve with innovations and enhanced capabilities, they represent the diverse landscape of modern SUVs, catering to a wide range of drivers' needs and preferences.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte de første kriteriene ved bilkjøp. Her ser man hvilken modell som lønner seg på sikt – enten det gjelder drivstoff, lading eller innkjøpspris.

MINI Countryman har et knapt merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 36800 €, mens Jeep Compass koster 39900 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 3100 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Jeep Compass klarer seg med 2 L og er dermed overbevisende mer drivstofføkonomisk enn MINI Countryman, som bruker 4.60 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 2.60 L per 100 km.

I strømforbruk har MINI Countryman fordelen: med 15.70 kWh per 100 km er den en smule mer effektiv enn Jeep Compass, som bruker 17.50 kWh. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.80 kWh.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Jeep Compass nesten umerkelig bedre: den klarer opptil 500 km, omtrent 38 km mer enn MINI Countryman.

Countryman @ press.bmwgroup.com

Motor og ytelse

Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har MINI Countryman et klart synlig overtak – 313 hk mot 240 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 73 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er MINI Countryman merkbar raskere – 5.40 s mot 7.30 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.90 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger MINI Countryman i liten grad foran – den når 250 km/h, mens Jeep Compass stopper på 200 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 50 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: MINI Countryman drar påfallende kraftigere med 494 Nm mot 345 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 149 Nm.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Jeep Compass minimal lettere – 1575 kg mot 1620 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 45 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Jeep Compass nesten umerkelig mer plass – 550 L mot 505 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 45 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer MINI Countryman knapt merkbar bedre – opptil 1530 L, omtrent 143 L mer enn Jeep Compass.

I nyttelast vinner MINI Countryman minimal – 500 kg mot 470 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 30 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser MINI Countryman seg å være har overtaket og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 36 800
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count

MINI Countryman

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Elektrisk, Bensin
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 163 - 313 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 4.6 - 7.8 L
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 15.7 - 16.8 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 432 - 462 km
detaljer

Jeep Compass

2 (1)
vurder

Jeep Compass kombinerer robust Jeep-personlighet med moderne komfort, og føles like hjemme både i byjungelen og på lettere grusveier. Interiøret er praktisk og innbydende, og Compass er et klokt valg for de som vil ha ekte SUV-følelse uten unødig drama i hverdagen.

detaljer
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002 @ media.stellantis.com
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012 @ media.stellantis.com

MINI Countryman

MINI Countryman leverer fortsatt den lekne kjørefølelsen man forventer fra merket, men med mer rom og praktisk fornuft som gjør den til et smart valg for familier som ikke vil ofre personlighet. Den ser småfrekk ut i bybildet og takler både handletur og helgetur uten å miste sjarmen — en perfekt kompromiss mellom moro og fornuft.

detaljer
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ press.bmwgroup.com
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr @ press.bmwgroup.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Jeep Compass
MINI Countryman
Compass
Countryman

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
39900 - 54700 €
Pris
36800 - 52900 €
Forbruk L/100km
2 - 5.9 L
Forbruk L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
Forbruk kWh/100km
15.7 - 16.8 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
36 - 500 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
432 - 462 km
Batterikapasitet
74 kWh
Batterikapasitet
64.60 kWh
co2
0 - 133 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Tankkapasitet
36 - 55 L
Tankkapasitet
45 - 54 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1575 - 2198 kg
Egenvekt
1620 - 2075 kg
Bagasjerom
420 - 550 L
Bagasjerom
450 - 505 L
Lengde
4404 - 4552 mm
Lengde
4444 - 4447 mm
Bredde
1819 mm
Bredde
1843 mm
Høyde
1629 - 1675 mm
Høyde
1635 - 1661 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1230 - 1387 L
Maks bagasjerom
1450 - 1530 L
Nyttelast
465 - 470 kg
Nyttelast
460 - 500 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid, Elektrisk
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Elektrisk, Bensin
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Automatgirkasse, Reduksjonsgir
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Automatgirkasse, Reduksjonsgir
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
130 - 240 hk
Effekt hk
163 - 313 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.3 - 10.3 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.4 - 8.6 s
Maks hastighet
180 - 200 km/h
Maks hastighet
170 - 250 km/h
Dreiemoment
230 - 345 Nm
Dreiemoment
250 - 494 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
96 - 177 kW
Effekt kW
120 - 230 kW
Slagvolum
1199 - 1469 cm3
Slagvolum
1499 - 1998 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, B, A
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E, A, G
Merke
Jeep
Merke
MINI

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Jeep Compass?

Jeep Compass er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.