Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

The Battle of Compact SUVs: Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR

The automotive industry is buzzing with compact SUVs that offer a blend of urban functionality and the adventurous spirit of larger SUVs. Two models stand out in this segment: the Ford Puma and the Toyota C-HR. While both vehicles fall under the SUV category, they appeal to different types of drivers with their technical specifications and design choices.

Performance and Powertrain

The Ford Puma comes equipped with a range of petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) and electric options. Its power output varies from 125 HP to 168 HP, with diverse engine options catering to different driving preferences. The Puma promises efficient fuel consumption, ranging between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, and an electric option using 13.1 to 13.7 kWh/100km. The Puma's electric variant offers an impressive range of up to 376 km, powered by a 43 kWh battery.

On the other hand, the Toyota C-HR offers both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid variants, providing power outputs of 140 HP to 223 HP. Its fuel efficiency is notable, especially the plug-in hybrid, which consumes just 0.8 L/100km. The electric range of the C-HR's plug-in version reaches up to 68 km, perfectly suited for urban commutes.

Transmission and Drive

The Ford Puma offers both manual and automatic transmissions, with transmission details ranging from a 6-speed manual gearbox to a dual-clutch automatic and reduction gearbox in the EV variant. The drive type is consistent with front-wheel drive across the range, ensuring simplicity and efficiency.

In contrast, the Toyota C-HR relies on a continuously variable transmission (CVT) for smoother gear shifts. It also offers flexibility with both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to various driving conditions and customer preferences.

Design and Dimensions

Measuring between 4186 and 4226 mm in length, the Ford Puma marries a sporty design with a practical SUV build. With a width of 1805 mm and a height near 1550 mm, it provides a balanced profile that emphasizes agility and ease of parking in urban settings. Engineered with a lightweight structure, it has a curb weight ranging from 1316 to 1563 kg.

The Toyota C-HR projects a more robust stance with a length of 4362 mm, width of 1832 mm, and height ranging from 1558 to 1564 mm. Its curb weight spans from 1505 to 1755 kg. The C-HR offers a dynamic design with sharp lines, catering to those who seek both aesthetics and functionality.

Interior Comfort and Cargo Space

Both the Puma and C-HR are equipped to accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Ford Puma gains an edge in trunk capacity, offering between 456 to 523 liters, making it ideal for those in need of extra cargo space for travel or outdoor activities.

The Toyota C-HR provides a trunk capacity of 350 to 447 liters, which, although less than the Puma, is still sufficient for everyday use and weekend adventures. The interior of the C-HR is designed to feel spacious and airy, ensuring comfort over longer drives.

Environmental Considerations

From an environmental perspective, both models make significant strides. The Puma's CO2 emissions range from 0 g/km for the electric variant to up to 136 g/km for petrol engines. The C-HR, equipped with hybrid technology, manages to keep emissions remarkably low, with the plug-in version at just 19 g/km of CO2.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Compact SUV

In the head-to-head comparison between the Ford Puma and Toyota C-HR, each model brings its strengths to the table. The Puma's flexible engine options and sporty design make it an appealing choice for those who appreciate performance and style. On the other hand, the C-HR's hybrid technology and design appeal might draw in drivers committed to sustainability and modern aesthetics. Ultimately, the choice hinges on personal preference: whether you prioritize cutting-edge hybrid technology or a dynamic driving experience, both vehicles represent the best in class for compact SUVs.