VS

Fiat Scudo vs Toyota Proace Transporter – Hvilken modell fungerer best i hverdagen?

To biler, én duell: Fiat Scudo møter Toyota Proace Transporter.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

A Head-to-Head Comparison: Fiat Scudo vs. Toyota Proace Transporter

The commercial van market is teeming with options, yet the Fiat Scudo and the Toyota Proace Transporter stand out as formidable contenders. Both vehicles, characterized by their robust features, enjoy a solid reputation in the cargo van segment. In this comparative review, we delve into the key technical aspects and innovations that set these vans apart, enabling you to make an informed decision that suits your business needs.

Engine Options and Performance

Under the hood, both the Fiat Scudo and Toyota Proace Transporter offer a variety of diesel and electric engine options, catering to diverse operational requirements. The Scudo's power outputs range from 100 to 180 HP for diesel and up to 177 HP for electric versions, while the Proace delivers between 120 and 144 HP across its engine options.

For electric powertrains, the Scudo boasts a maximum range of 352 km on a full charge, compared to the Proace's 349 km. When it comes to acceleration, the Scudo offers a quicker 0-100 km/h sprint, clocking in at just 10.5 seconds, whereas the Proace takes up to 13.3 seconds to achieve the same speed.

Transmission and Drive Type

Both vans offer manual and automatic transmission systems. The Scudo provides a manual gearbox, automatic gearbox, and a reduction gearbox, similar to the offerings of the Proace. Front-wheel drive is the common drive type for these models, ensuring reliable handling in urban and highway settings.

Dimension and Payload

In terms of dimension, the length of both vans ranges from 4980 mm to 5330 mm, paired with a width of 1920 mm. The height for the Scudo varies slightly between 1881 mm and 1935 mm, while the Proace sticks between 1895 mm and 1935 mm, offering ample headroom.

The payload capacity of the Scudo can reach up to 1318 kg, whereas the Proace's maximum payload is slightly higher at 1496 kg. This makes the Proace a more suitable option for those needing to transport heavier goods.

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Performance

Fuel consumption is a critical consideration in commercial vehicles. The Scudo's diesel consumption ranges between 6.5 and 7.8 L/100km, while its electric consumption ranges from 23.6 to 27 kWh/100 km. The Proace competes closely with a similar diesel consumption range of 6.6 to 7.6 L/100km and an electric consumption peaking at 23.9 kWh/100 km.

On the environmental front, both models present zero emissions options in their electric variants. CO2 emissions for diesel models vary, with the Scudo displaying a range of 170 to 205 g/km, while the Proace spans from 173 to 199 g/km.

Seating Capacity and Comfort

Both the Fiat Scudo and Toyota Proace Transporter offer versatility in seating configurations, ranging from 2 to 6 seats, making them ideal for diverse business applications. Comfort and convenience features vary across trims, yet both manufacturers emphasize ergonomic design, ensuring driver and passenger ease during long hauls.

Conclusion

Choosing between the Fiat Scudo and Toyota Proace Transporter requires careful consideration of specific operational needs. The Scudo offers slightly better performance and range in its electric variant, while the Proace delivers superior payload capacity. Ultimately, the decision boils down to balancing performance, efficiency, and payload requirements to suit your business needs.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte de første kriteriene ved bilkjøp. Her ser man hvilken modell som lønner seg på sikt – enten det gjelder drivstoff, lading eller innkjøpspris.

Fiat Scudo har et knapt merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 36100 €, mens Toyota Proace Transporter koster 36900 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 851 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Fiat Scudo klarer seg med 6.20 L og er dermed nesten umerkelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Toyota Proace Transporter, som bruker 6.40 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.20 L per 100 km.

I strømforbruk har Fiat Scudo fordelen: med 23.60 kWh per 100 km er den lett mer effektiv enn Toyota Proace Transporter, som bruker 23.80 kWh. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.20 kWh.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Fiat Scudo minimal bedre: den klarer opptil 352 km, omtrent 3 km mer enn Toyota Proace Transporter.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Fiat Scudo et i liten grad overtak – 180 hk mot 150 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 30 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Fiat Scudo i liten grad raskere – 10.50 s mot 12.10 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.60 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Toyota Proace Transporter merkbar foran – den når 170 km/h, mens Fiat Scudo stopper på 130 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 40 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Fiat Scudo drar lett kraftigere med 400 Nm mot 370 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 30 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 6 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Toyota Proace Transporter knapt merkbar lettere – 1656 kg mot 1722 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 66 kg.

Den maksimale lastekapasiteten er lik – begge kan romme opptil 6600 L.

I nyttelast vinner Fiat Scudo merkbar – 1805 kg mot 1323 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 482 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Fiat Scudo seg å være dominerer sammenligningen og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 36 100

Fiat Scudo

  • Motortype : Elektrisk, Diesel
  • Girkasse : Automat, Manuel
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 120 - 180 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 6.2 - 6.5 L
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 23.6 - 24 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 221 - 352 km
detaljer

Fiat Scudo

Scudo er en pålitelig og romslig varebil som har blitt et populært valg blant håndverkere og bedrifter. Med sitt fleksible lasteområde og komfortable interiør, gjør den hverdagskjøringen enklere. I tillegg kombinerer Scudo moderne design med praktiske funksjoner som tilfredsstiller både profesjonelle og private brukere.

detaljer

Toyota Proace Transporter

Proace Transporter er den ideelle løsningen for både profesjonelle og bedriftsbehov, med sitt romslige lasteområde og smarte design. Bilen tilbyr en imponerende kombinasjon av komfort og funksjonalitet, noe som gjør hverdagen enklere for enhver sjåfør. Med fokus på pålitelighet og effektivitet er Proace Transporter et smart valg for dem som trenger en robust arbeidshest.

detaljer

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Fiat Scudo
Toyota Proace Transporter

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
36100 - 59900 €
Pris
36900 - 59500 €
Forbruk L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L
Forbruk L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh
Forbruk kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
221 - 352 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
221 - 349 km
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
0 - 172 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Tankkapasitet
69 L
Tankkapasitet
69 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Varebil
Karosseri
Varebil
Seter
2 - 6
Seter
3 - 6
Dører
4
Dører
4 - 5
Egenvekt
1722 - 2260 kg
Egenvekt
1656 - 2100 kg
Bagasjerom
-
Bagasjerom
-
Lengde
4980 - 5330 mm
Lengde
4980 - 5330 mm
Bredde
1920 mm
Bredde
1920 mm
Høyde
1895 - 1935 mm
Høyde
1895 - 1935 mm
Maks bagasjerom
5300 - 6600 L
Maks bagasjerom
3200 - 6600 L
Nyttelast
840 - 1805 kg
Nyttelast
955 - 1323 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Elektrisk, Diesel
Motortype
Elektrisk, Diesel
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Gir detalj
Reduksjonsgir, Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Reduksjonsgir, Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
120 - 180 hk
Effekt hk
120 - 150 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
10.5 - 11.2 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
12.1 - 13.3 s
Maks hastighet
130 km/h
Maks hastighet
130 - 170 km/h
Dreiemoment
260 - 400 Nm
Dreiemoment
260 - 370 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
88 - 132 kW
Effekt kW
88 - 110 kW
Slagvolum
1499 - 2184 cm3
Slagvolum
1499 - 2184 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A, F
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A
Merke
Fiat
Merke
Toyota

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Fiat Scudo?

Modellen tilbys med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.