Dacia Spring vs Toyota Aygo – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Compact Contenders: Dacia Spring vs. Toyota Aygo

In the competitive landscape of urban mobility, two compact cars stand out with their unique offerings: the Dacia Spring and the Toyota Aygo. As city-friendly SUVs, they promise practicality, efficiency, and a touch of innovation. Let's dive into the specifics to see how these two models compare in the race to win city dwellers' hearts.

Electric Zing vs. Petrol Precision

The Dacia Spring and the Toyota Aygo are based on two distinct powertrains—electric and petrol, respectively. The Dacia Spring is equipped with an electric motor offering a power output of up to 65 HP (48 kW) and a torque of 113 Nm. It's designed for those who are ready to embrace zero-emission driving with a CO2 rating of 0 g/km, making it extremely appealing for environmentally conscious buyers.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo is powered by a reliable 1.0-liter inline-three petrol engine, producing 72 HP (53 kW) and 93 Nm of torque. This petrol engine provides the regular car feel with familiarity in long-range cruising that some drivers value. It emits between 108 and 112 g/km of CO2, positioning it in the C efficiency class.

Efficiency and Range: Urban Prowess

The Dacia Spring leads in electric efficiency with consumption figures as low as 13.2 kWh/100km and an electric range of up to 228 km, making it perfect for daily urban commutes. The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, boasts a fuel consumption of about 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km, offering a considerable range when fully fueled—the fuel tank capacity is 35 L.

Performance and Practicality

While neither of these cars is built for the track, they handle the cityscape with ease. The Dacia Spring accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a modest 13.7 seconds, while its top speed maxes out at 125 km/h, prioritizing economy over speed. In comparison, the Toyota Aygo does the same sprint in about 15.5 seconds with a top speed reaching up to 158 km/h, providing a bit more pep for open-road stretches.

Space and Comfort

Both models are compact SUVs with dimensions that manage urban environments efficiently. The Dacia Spring measures 3701 mm in length, 1583 mm in width, and 1519 mm in height. It offers a trunk capacity of 308 liters, making it slightly roomier for baggage than the Aygo.

The Toyota Aygo, just a millimeter shorter at 3700 mm in length, is wider at 1740 mm, providing more passenger space but with a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 231 liters. Both carry four passengers and feature five-door designs, enhancing their practicality.

Conclusion: Making the Urban Choice

The Dacia Spring and Toyota Aygo represent two intersecting trajectories in urban mobility: electrification versus conventional petrol. The former suits those keen on sustainability and lower running costs, while the latter offers a traditional driving experience with a wider range.

Whichever you choose, both are adept at tackling city streets. Whether you lean towards the cutting-edge greenness of the Dacia Spring or the tried-and-true spirit of the Toyota Aygo, these compact SUVs encapsulate the essence of modern urban driving.