VS

MG MG3 vs Toyota Aygo – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Sammenlign ytelse, bagasjerom, forbruk og pris på et øyeblikk.
Finn ut hvilken bil som er det beste valget for deg – MG MG3 eller Toyota Aygo?

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

MG MG3 vs Toyota Aygo: A Compact Battle of the Hatchbacks

In the arena of compact hatchbacks, two contenders vie for supremacy: the British-bred MG MG3 and the Japanese stalwart, the Toyota Aygo. Both these vehicles offer unique features tailored for urban driving, but how do they compare in terms of performance, innovation, and design? Let's delve deeper into the specifications and features of these two models.

Aygo @ Toyota

Under the Hood: Power and Performance

The MG MG3 sets a strong stance with its versatile engine options. This hatchback offers both full hybrid and traditional petrol variants, allowing for greater flexibility and efficiency. With horsepower options ranging from 116 to a peppy 194 HP, the MG3 provides robust performance for city drives, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 8 seconds. The curb weight stands at 1285 kg, which complements its acceleration capabilities.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo comes with a simpler engine lineup, focusing purely on petrol power. Generating a modest 72 HP, the Aygo is designed for efficiency over power, with its 0 to 100 km/h dash taking 15.5 to 15.6 seconds. Nevertheless, its significantly lighter curb weight of 1015 kg contributes to its nimbleness in urban environments.

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Fuel Efficiency: A Clash of Consumption

In terms of fuel efficiency, both the MG3 and Aygo present commendable figures. The MG3's fuel consumption ranges from 4.4 to 6.1 L/100km, depending on the powertrain chosen, indicating an efficient use of fuel for various driving conditions. The Toyota Aygo, staying true to its economical ethos, records a slightly higher consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km, still making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious drivers.

Aygo @ Toyota

Space and Practicality

Despite their compact designs, both hatchbacks prioritize space and practicality. The MG3 boasts a larger trunk capacity of 293 liters, ideal for urban travelers needing that extra cargo space. It comfortably seats five, making it a friendly choice for small groups or families. The Toyota Aygo, being slightly smaller, offers 231 liters of trunk space and seats four, aligning with its target as a nimble city companion.

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Innovative Features and Design

The MG MG3 stands out with its mix of traditional and hybrid engines, catering to drivers aiming for both power and eco-friendliness. Its 5-door design, coupled with a sleek body, enhances its appeal in the hatchback segment. The presence of both automatic and manual transmissions offers drivers the flexibility to choose their preferred driving experience.

The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, draws attention with its compact SUV-inspired stance. Despite its smaller engine capacity of 998 cm3, it garners appreciation for its CVT technology, promoting a smooth and effortless driving experience. Its 5-door accessibility remains a practical feature, and though it seats fewer passengers than the MG3, its compact size makes it an excellent choice for urban navigation.

Aygo @ Toyota

Conclusion

Choosing between the MG MG3 and the Toyota Aygo depends largely on the driver's priorities. If power and the option for hybrid efficiency ring important to a buyer, the MG3 with its array of features might be the go-to. For those prioritizing economical petrol consumption and a lightweight, nimble city vehicle, the Aygo could be the perfect match. Both vehicles blend practicality with modern-day needs, carving their own niche in the bustling hatchback market. Ultimately, the choice lies in individual preferences for power, efficiency, and style.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

MG MG3 har et minimal prisfortrinn – den starter på 18000 €, mens Toyota Aygo koster 18100 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 100 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: MG MG3 klarer seg med 4.40 L og er dermed knapt merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Toyota Aygo, som bruker 4.80 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.40 L per 100 km.

Aygo @ Toyota

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har MG MG3 et klart merkbar overtak – 194 hk mot 72 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 122 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er MG MG3 overbevisende raskere – 8 s mot 15.50 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 7.50 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger MG MG3 litt foran – den når 185 km/h, mens Toyota Aygo stopper på 158 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 27 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: MG MG3 drar merkbar kraftigere med 148 Nm mot 93 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 55 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Seter: MG MG3 tilbyr en smule flere sitteplasser – 5 mot 4.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Toyota Aygo merkbar lettere – 1015 kg mot 1237 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 222 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr MG MG3 merkbar mer plass – 293 L mot 231 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 62 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer MG MG3 i liten grad bedre – opptil 983 L, omtrent 154 L mer enn Toyota Aygo.

I nyttelast vinner MG MG3 klart synlig – 448 kg mot 345 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 103 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

MG MG3 viser seg å være dominerer sammenligningen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår MG MG3 som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 18 000
KV-1-1

MG MG3

  • Motortype : Full hybrid, Bensin
  • Girkasse : Automat, Manuel
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 116 - 194 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 4.4 - 6.1 L
detaljer

MG MG3

5 (1)
vurder

MG3 er en attraktiv liten bil som kombinerer moderne design med praktisk brukervennlighet. Den romslige kupeen og gode bagasjerommet gjør den ideell for bykjøring og hverdagsbruk. Med sitt sporty utseende og imponerende funksjoner tilbyr MG3 en flott kjøreopplevelse for både unge og erfarne sjåfører.

detaljer
KV-1-1 @ news.mgmotor.eu
Left-Back-30°-1 @ news.mgmotor.eu
Front-Row-Space-1 @ news.mgmotor.eu
Trunk-3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Toyota Aygo

Toyota Aygo er en kvikk og leken bybil som gjør trange parkeringsplasser til en lek og gir deg et smil i hverdagen. Med smart design, lettmanøvrert cockpit og personlighet i hver detalj er Aygo et opplagt valg for deg som vil ha rimelig moro uten unødvendig ståhei.

detaljer
75916-2022aygoxdplstaticginger003-web-lr @ Toyota
75919-2022aygoxdplstaticginger006-web-lr @ Toyota
75917-2022aygoxdplstaticginger004-web-lr @ Toyota
75918-2022aygoxdplstaticginger005-web-lr @ Toyota
75881-2022aygoxdpldetailginger007-web-lr @ Toyota
75806-2022aygoxdpldetailchilired003-web-lr @ Toyota

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
MG MG3
Toyota Aygo
MG3
Aygo

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
18000 - 25000 €
Pris
18100 - 25800 €
Forbruk L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
Forbruk L/100km
4.8 - 4.9 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
108 - 111 g/km
Tankkapasitet
36 - 45 L
Tankkapasitet
35 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Hatchback
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
4
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1237 - 1285 kg
Egenvekt
1015 kg
Bagasjerom
293 L
Bagasjerom
231 L
Lengde
4113 mm
Lengde
3700 mm
Bredde
1797 mm
Bredde
1740 mm
Høyde
1502 mm
Høyde
1510 mm
Maks bagasjerom
983 L
Maks bagasjerom
829 L
Nyttelast
373 - 448 kg
Nyttelast
345 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Full hybrid, Bensin
Motortype
Bensin
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, CVT-girkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
116 - 194 hk
Effekt hk
72 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8 - 10.8 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
15.5 - 15.6 s
Maks hastighet
170 - 185 km/h
Maks hastighet
151 - 158 km/h
Dreiemoment
148 Nm
Dreiemoment
93 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
3
Effekt kW
85 - 143 kW
Effekt kW
53 kW
Slagvolum
1490 - 1495 cm3
Slagvolum
998 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, E
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C
Merke
MG
Merke
Toyota

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr MG MG3?

Modellen tilbys med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.