VS

Ford Ranger vs Nissan Micra – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Enten du ser etter en bil til hverdagsbruk, familie eller lange turer – her ser du forskjellene.
Finn ut om Ford Ranger eller Nissan Micra passer best til din livsstil.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte områdene med de tydeligste forskjellene. Her avgjøres det ofte hvilken bil som passer best til budsjettet over tid.

Nissan Micra har et betydelig prisfortrinn – den starter på 28000 €, mens Ford Ranger koster 43800 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 15790 €.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Nissan Micra tydelig bedre: den klarer opptil 416 km, omtrent 374 km mer enn Ford Ranger.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Ford Ranger et klart merkbar overtak – 292 hk mot 150 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 142 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Ford Ranger minimal raskere – 7.90 s mot 8 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.10 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Ford Ranger klart synlig foran – den når 190 km/h, mens Nissan Micra stopper på 150 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 40 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Ford Ranger drar betydelig kraftigere med 697 Nm mot 245 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 452 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Nissan Micra overbevisende lettere – 1452 kg mot 2082 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 630 kg.

I nyttelast vinner Ford Ranger tydelig – 1108 kg mot 408 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 700 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Nissan Micra viser seg å være vinner så vidt og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Nissan Micra som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 28 000

Nissan Micra

  • Motortype : Elektrisk
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 122 - 150 hk
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 14.2 - 14.7 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 317 - 416 km
detaljer

Ford Ranger

Ranger har etablert seg som en av de mest allsidige pick-upene på markedet, perfekt for både arbeid og fritid. Den robuste designen kombinert med moderne teknologi gir en tilfredsstillende kjøreopplevelse, enten du navigerer i bytrafikken eller tar deg ut i naturen. Med god lastekapasitet og komfortable sitteplasser er Ranger et utmerket valg for de som trenger både funksjonalitet og stil.

detaljer
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C @ media.ford.com
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8 @ media.ford.com

Nissan Micra

The Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.

detaljer

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Ford Ranger
Nissan Micra
Ranger

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
43800 - 83800 €
Pris
28000 - 34900 €
Forbruk L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Forbruk L/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh
Elektrisk rekkevidde
42 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
317 - 416 km
Batterikapasitet
11.80 kWh
Batterikapasitet
40 - 52 kWh
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Tankkapasitet
80 L
Tankkapasitet
-

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Pickup
Karosseri
Hatchback
Seter
2 - 5
Seter
5
Dører
2 - 4
Dører
5
Egenvekt
2082 - 2511 kg
Egenvekt
1452 - 1527 kg
Bagasjerom
-
Bagasjerom
326 L
Lengde
5370 - 5420 mm
Lengde
3974 mm
Bredde
1918 - 1968 mm
Bredde
1774 mm
Høyde
1868 - 1922 mm
Høyde
1490 mm
Maks bagasjerom
-
Maks bagasjerom
1106 L
Nyttelast
676 - 1108 kg
Nyttelast
403 - 408 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Diesel, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid
Motortype
Elektrisk
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Reduksjonsgir
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
170 - 292 hk
Effekt hk
122 - 150 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.9 - 12.1 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8 - 9 s
Maks hastighet
180 - 190 km/h
Maks hastighet
150 km/h
Dreiemoment
405 - 697 Nm
Dreiemoment
225 - 245 Nm
Antall sylindre
4 - 6
Antall sylindre
-
Effekt kW
125 - 215 kW
Effekt kW
90 - 110 kW
Slagvolum
1996 - 2993 cm3
Slagvolum
-

Generelt
Modellår
2022 - 2025
Modellår
2026
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
G, B
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A
Merke
Ford
Merke
Nissan

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Ford Ranger?

Modellen tilbys med Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.