VS

Ford Ranger vs Jeep Wrangler – Hvilken bil er det beste valget?

Enten du ser etter en bil til hverdagsbruk, familie eller lange turer – her ser du forskjellene.
Finn ut om Ford Ranger eller Jeep Wrangler passer best til din livsstil.

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Ford Ranger vs Jeep Wrangler: A Clash of the Titans

When it comes to rugged durability and off-road prowess, two names immediately come to mind: the Ford Ranger and the Jeep Wrangler. Both vehicles have carved a niche for themselves in the world of adventure and capability. As we delve into the technical aspects and innovations of these two automotive icons, we will see where each excels and what makes them unique in this competitive market.

Wrangler @ media.stellantis.com

Engine Performance and Efficiency

The Ford Ranger offers a variety of engine options tailored to different driving needs. From a robust turbocharged diesel to potent petrol engines, drivers can select power outputs ranging from 170 to 292 HP. With torque figures peaking at 600Nm, the Ranger is well-equipped for heavy-duty tasks and towing. In terms of fuel efficiency, it seeks to balance power with consumption, offering an average between 8.4 to 13.8 L/100km.

On the other hand, the Jeep Wrangler takes a more modern approach to efficiency with its plug-in hybrid engine. Delivering a substantial 380 HP and a torque of 637 Nm, the Wrangler offers impressive acceleration from 0-100 km/h in just 6.5 seconds. Its fuel economy stands out with a consumption of only 3.3 to 4 L/100km and an electric range of up to 42 km, making it an eco-friendly off-roader.

Ranger @ media.ford.com

Transmission and Drive Type

Both vehicles come with all-wheel-drive capabilities, perfectly suited for traversing challenging terrains. The Ford Ranger provides flexibility with its choice of manual and automatic gearbox, catering to those who appreciate hands-on control or prefer convenience.

The Jeep Wrangler sticks to an automatic transmission system, optimizing its plug-in hybrid system for seamless power delivery. This setup simplifies driving in rocky or muddy conditions with advanced traction control features.

Wrangler @ media.stellantis.com

Capacity and Practicality

The Ford Ranger boasts an impressive payload capacity of up to 1108 kg, coupled with a sizable fuel tank capacity of 80 L, making it perfect for long-distance hauls and commercial uses. Configurations vary from two to five seats, with solid towing capabilities benefiting both adventure enthusiasts and workers alike.

While the Jeep Wrangler offers a slightly lower payload of up to 536 kg, its appeal lies in its off-road expertise and respectable interior space. Seating for five and a trunk capacity of 533 L ensure passengers travel in comfort while offering enough room for gear and adventure equipment.

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Ranger’s dimensions stretch to a length of 5420 mm and a width of 1968 mm, asserting its presence on the road. Its design philosophy is rooted in rugged practicality with a hint of modern sophistication.

Conversely, the Jeep Wrangler, with dimensions of 4882 mm in length and 1894 mm in width, takes a more compact approach. The Wrangler’s design retains its iconic look, with the height adjustable between 1838 and 1848 mm to suit various needs.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Own Adventure

Ultimately, choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Jeep Wrangler boils down to individual needs and preferences. If raw power, diverse engine options, and practical payload capacities are your priority, the Ford Ranger stands ready to meet those demands.

For those leaning toward a cutting-edge hybrid with excellent fuel efficiency and legendary off-road capabilities, the Jeep Wrangler remains a top contender. Both vehicles embody the spirit of adventure, and whichever you choose, you're guaranteed a thrilling ride.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte områdene med de tydeligste forskjellene. Her avgjøres det ofte hvilken bil som passer best til budsjettet over tid.

Ford Ranger har et betydelig prisfortrinn – den starter på 43800 €, mens Jeep Wrangler koster 81500 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 37720 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Ford Ranger klarer seg med 3.10 L og er dermed nesten umerkelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Jeep Wrangler, som bruker 3.30 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.20 L per 100 km.

Rekkevidden er nesten identisk – begge klarer omtrent 42 km på én lading.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon er klassiske mål for bilentusiaster – og her kommer forskjellene tydelig fram.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Jeep Wrangler et merkbar overtak – 380 hk mot 292 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 88 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Jeep Wrangler tydelig raskere – 6.50 s mot 7.90 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.40 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Ford Ranger minimal foran – den når 190 km/h, mens Jeep Wrangler stopper på 177 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 13 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Ford Ranger drar nesten umerkelig kraftigere med 697 Nm mot 637 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 60 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Ford Ranger minimal lettere – 2082 kg mot 2276 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 194 kg.

I nyttelast vinner Ford Ranger klart merkbar – 1108 kg mot 536 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 572 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Ford Ranger viser seg å være overgår på nesten alle punkter og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Ford Ranger som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 43 800
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C

Ford Ranger

  • Motortype : Diesel, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 170 - 292 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 3.1 - 13.8 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 42 km
detaljer

Ford Ranger

Ford Ranger er en robust og praktisk pickup som takler både tung jobb på byggeplassen og komfortabel helgetur til hytta. Den kombinerer solid byggkvalitet med moderne utstyr og ser fortsatt tøff ut i gjørma — en arbeidskamerat som også liker å være med på moro.

detaljer
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C @ media.ford.com
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8 @ media.ford.com

Jeep Wrangler

Wrangler er et ikon blant terrengkjøretøy, kjent for sin robuste utforming og sterke offroad-egenskaper. Med sitt tidløse design og allsidighet, tiltrekker den seg både eventyrere og bykjørere. Wrangler tar deg med på fantastiske opplevelser, uansett hvor veien fører deg.

detaljer
hp_jp021_019wr-5f50e35976ec0_60af732e25b4d @ media.stellantis.com
jp021_015wr-5f50e325a2f5d_60af732e2d68d @ media.stellantis.com
jeepwrangler4xefirstedition_lateral-600aba056478e_60af732e20e9c @ media.stellantis.com
jp021_011wr-5f50e3489b286_60af732e27d1b @ media.stellantis.com
_afp5092-60ae560437c95_60af732e02a1c @ media.stellantis.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Ford Ranger
Jeep Wrangler
Ranger
Wrangler

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
43800 - 83800 €
Pris
81500 - 83500 €
Forbruk L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
Forbruk L/100km
3.3 - 4 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
42 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
38 - 42 km
Batterikapasitet
11.80 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
70 - 315 g/km
co2
74 - 91 g/km
Tankkapasitet
80 L
Tankkapasitet
65 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Pickup
Karosseri
Terrengbil
Seter
2 - 5
Seter
5
Dører
2 - 4
Dører
5
Egenvekt
2082 - 2511 kg
Egenvekt
2276 - 2383 kg
Bagasjerom
-
Bagasjerom
533 L
Lengde
5370 - 5420 mm
Lengde
4882 mm
Bredde
1918 - 1968 mm
Bredde
1894 mm
Høyde
1868 - 1922 mm
Høyde
1838 - 1848 mm
Maks bagasjerom
-
Maks bagasjerom
2050 L
Nyttelast
676 - 1108 kg
Nyttelast
520 - 536 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Diesel, Bensin, Plug-in hybrid
Motortype
Plug-in hybrid
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
170 - 292 hk
Effekt hk
380 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.9 - 12.1 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
6.50 s
Maks hastighet
180 - 190 km/h
Maks hastighet
156 - 177 km/h
Dreiemoment
405 - 697 Nm
Dreiemoment
637 Nm
Antall sylindre
4 - 6
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
125 - 215 kW
Effekt kW
280 kW
Slagvolum
1996 - 2993 cm3
Slagvolum
1995 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2022 - 2025
Modellår
2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
G, B
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B
Merke
Ford
Merke
Jeep

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech features that appeal to younger buyers. Ultimately, both models excel in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, making them top choices for families and urban dwellers alike.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Ford Ranger?

Modellen tilbys med Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.