VS

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Renault Captur – Hvilken modell fungerer best i hverdagen?

To biler, én duell: Fiat Tipo Wagon møter Renault Captur.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

Tipo Wagon @ media.stellantis.com

Fiat Tipo Station Wagon vs. Renault Captur: The Battle of Practicality and Style

The automotive world is constantly evolving, with manufacturers pushing the boundaries to offer more to drivers. In this landscape, the Fiat Tipo Station Wagon and the Renault Captur stand out as two compelling choices. Both cars cater to individuals seeking a blend of practicality and innovation, yet each offers a unique set of features. Let's dive deeper into their technical specifications and features to help you make an informed decision.

Captur @ renault-presse.de

Body and Design

The Fiat Tipo Station Wagon boasts a traditional yet sleek wagon body type, emphasizing spaciousness and practicality. With dimensions of 4571mm in length, 1792mm in width, and 1514mm in height, it presents a robust on-road presence while providing ample interior space. On the other hand, the Renault Captur embraces the trendy SUV design, slightly more compact at 4239mm long, 1797mm wide, and taller at 1575mm, providing a commanding view of the road. Each car features five doors and seating for five, catering to families and groups.

Tipo Wagon @ media.stellantis.com

Performance and Efficiency

Under the hood, the Fiat Tipo offers a choice between petrol mild-hybrid and diesel engines, with power outputs of 130 HP and a torque range of 240 to 320 Nm. The Tipo's engine capacity ranges from 1469 to 1598 cm3, offering a balance of power and efficiency, with fuel consumption as low as 4.7 L/100km. In contrast, the Renault Captur provides a more diverse engine lineup, including full hybrid, petrol, LPG, and petrol mild-hybrid options. Its engines deliver between 91 and 158 HP, with torque varying from 160 to 270 Nm. The Captur’s consumption ranges from 4.7 to 7.8 L/100km, thanks to its lightweight design.

Captur @ renault-presse.de

Transmission and Drive

Both cars offer a choice between manual and automatic transmissions. The Fiat Tipo's options include a dual-clutch automatic or a manual gearbox, delivering smooth and responsive driving experiences. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, offers an automatic gearbox, manual options, and a dual-clutch automatic for those seeking seamless gear changes. Both vehicles are front-wheel drive, ensuring stable handling and efficient power distribution.

Tipo Wagon @ media.stellantis.com

Innovation and Technology

The 2024 models of both vehicles integrate the latest automotive innovations. The Tipo Station Wagon incorporates mild-hybrid technology, reducing emissions to as low as 122 g/km, and features a generous trunk capacity of 550 liters. The Renault Captur, known for its versatility, takes a step further with a full hybrid option and a CO2 efficiency class as high as C, minimizing its environmental impact with emissions starting at 106 g/km. The Captur’s trunk capacity ranges from 326 to 422 liters, making it versatile for everyday use.

Captur @ renault-presse.de

Conclusion

While both the Fiat Tipo Station Wagon and the Renault Captur cater to drivers' diverse needs, their distinct attributes make them suitable for different lifestyles. The Tipo is ideal for families or those who prioritize space and a traditional driving experience. Conversely, the Captur appeals to those seeking urban styling, flexibility in powertrain choices, and a more environmentally-conscious option. Ultimately, the choice between the two boils down to your personal preferences and priorities on the road.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte områdene med de tydeligste forskjellene. Her avgjøres det ofte hvilken bil som passer best til budsjettet over tid.

Renault Captur har et lett prisfortrinn – den starter på 23500 €, mens Fiat Tipo Wagon koster 24500 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 1000 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Renault Captur klarer seg med 4.50 L og er dermed minimal mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Fiat Tipo Wagon, som bruker 4.70 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.20 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Renault Captur et litt overtak – 158 hk mot 130 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 28 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Renault Captur lett raskere – 8.50 s mot 9.10 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.60 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Fiat Tipo Wagon litt foran – den når 207 km/h, mens Renault Captur stopper på 180 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 27 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Fiat Tipo Wagon drar i liten grad kraftigere med 320 Nm mot 270 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 50 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Renault Captur litt lettere – 1293 kg mot 1455 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 162 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Fiat Tipo Wagon påfallende mer plass – 550 L mot 422 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 128 L.

I nyttelast vinner Fiat Tipo Wagon nesten umerkelig – 475 kg mot 457 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 18 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Renault Captur seg å være har overtaket og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 23 500
r210470p

Renault Captur

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV, Bensin, Full hybrid
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 91 - 158 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 4.5 - 6 L
detaljer

Fiat Tipo Wagon

Tipo Station Wagon kombinerer stil og praktiske løsninger i en romslig pakke. Med sitt moderne design og komfortable interiør er den ideell for både bykjøring og lengre turer. Bilen tilbyr fleksible lagringsmuligheter som gjør den perfekt for aktive familier og eventyrlystne sjeler.

detaljer
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_05 @ media.stellantis.com
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_06 @ media.stellantis.com
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_13 @ media.stellantis.com

Renault Captur

Captur er en smart og urban crossover som mikser leken design med praktisk fleksibilitet og gjør hverdagens små eventyr litt morsommere. Den byr på komfortabel kjøreopplevelse, intuitive løsninger og akkurat passe mye personlighet til å føles som et godt valg for den stilbevisste pendlere.

detaljer
r210470p @ renault-presse.de
r210480p @ renault-presse.de
r210476p @ renault-presse.de
r210485p @ renault-presse.de

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Renault Captur
Tipo Wagon
Captur

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
24500 - 31500 €
Pris
23500 - 33100 €
Forbruk L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
102 - 135 g/km
Tankkapasitet
50 L
Tankkapasitet
48 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Stasjonsvogn
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1455 - 1470 kg
Egenvekt
1293 - 1514 kg
Bagasjerom
550 L
Bagasjerom
326 - 422 L
Lengde
4571 mm
Lengde
4239 mm
Bredde
1792 mm
Bredde
1797 mm
Høyde
1514 mm
Høyde
1575 mm
Maks bagasjerom
-
Maks bagasjerom
1276 - 1363 L
Nyttelast
475 kg
Nyttelast
376 - 457 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Diesel
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Bensin, Full hybrid
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Manuell girkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
130 hk
Effekt hk
91 - 158 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.1 - 10.1 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.5 - 14.3 s
Maks hastighet
206 - 207 km/h
Maks hastighet
168 - 180 km/h
Dreiemoment
240 - 320 Nm
Dreiemoment
160 - 270 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
96 kW
Effekt kW
67 - 116 kW
Slagvolum
1469 - 1598 cm3
Slagvolum
999 - 1789 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, C
Merke
Fiat
Merke
Renault

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Fiat Tipo Wagon?

Finnes som Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.