VS

Fiat Scudo vs VW Caddy Compact Van – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

Sammenlign ytelse, bagasjerom, forbruk og pris på et øyeblikk.
Finn ut hvilken bil som er det beste valget for deg – Fiat Scudo eller VW Caddy Compact Van?

A Comprehensive Look at the Fiat Scudo vs VW Caddy Kompaktvan

In the world of compact cargo vans, the Fiat Scudo and Volkswagen's Caddy Kompaktvan emerge as two leading contenders. Both models flaunt an impressive balance of innovation, performance, and utility. Here's a detailed comparison to help you discern which van stands out where it matters most.

Technical Aspects: Engines and Performance

The Fiat Scudo offers a diverse engine lineup, including diesel and electric variants. With power outputs ranging between 101 and 180 HP for diesel, and up to 177 HP for electric motors, the Scudo caters to both traditionalists and those leaning toward green technology. These engines are matched with either a manual or an automatic gearbox, prioritizing versatility and control.

In comparison, the VW Caddy Kompaktvan takes a slightly different approach, featuring petrol, diesel, and plug-in hybrid options. Power outputs range from 102 to 150 HP. The VW offers both manual and advanced dual-clutch automatic transmissions, ensuring smooth transitions and enhanced driving pleasure.

Fuel Economy and Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is a notable strength for VW, with the Caddy Kompaktvan achieving consumption figures as low as 5.3 L/100km for its petrol and diesel models, and a mere 0.5 L/100km for its hybrid version. Scudo's diesel consumption varies between 6.5 and 7.8 L/100km, with electric consumption fluctuating between 23.6 and 27 kWh/100km, offering an electric range of up to 352 km.

Dimensions and Capacity

Dimension-wise, the Scudo stretches from 4,609 mm to 5,309 mm in length, providing ample space for toolkit and goods. Its payload capacity tops at 1,333 kg, furthered by a robust build with curb weights between 1,616 kg and 2,260 kg.

The Caddy Kompaktvan is slightly more compact, ranging from 4,500 mm to 4,853 mm in length. It offers a maximum payload of 759 kg and curb weights from 1,442 kg to 1,818 kg, making it an agile and maneuverable choice ideal for urban deliveries.

Interior and Seating

Fiat's Scudo offers various seating configurations, accommodating between 2 to 6 seats, depending on specific model setups. This flexibility can appeal to both cargo transport and team travel needs.

Conversely, the Caddy Kompaktvan maintains a straightforward approach with a 2-seater configuration, focused on maximizing cargo space rather than passenger transport.

Innovations and Technology

The Scudo's embrace of electric powertrains signals Fiat's commitment to innovation and sustainability, while its versatile transmission options address diverse driving preferences. Additionally, the inclusion of a maximum speed of up to 185 km/h demonstrates an ability to swiftly handle longer hauls.

Volkswagen responds with the Caddy Kompaktvan's advanced dual-clutch automatic setup, promising enhanced driving dynamics and a finely tuned experience. The inclusion of plug-in hybrid technology not only offers superior fuel efficiency but also reduces the vehicle's environmental footprint.

Final Verdict

Both the Fiat Scudo and the VW Caddy Kompaktvan present compelling features tailored to specific needs. The Scudo’s flexibility and electric range make it appealing for businesses focused on versatile operations and sustainability. Meanwhile, the Caddy's fuel efficiency and innovative transmission solutions provide a fine balance between performance and economy. Thus, your ultimate choice hinges on personal priorities, be it capacity, fuel preference, or tech advancements.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

VW Caddy Compact Van har et en smule prisfortrinn – den starter på 30100 €, mens Fiat Scudo koster 36100 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 5932 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: VW Caddy Compact Van klarer seg med 0.50 L og er dermed tydelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Fiat Scudo, som bruker 6.20 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 5.70 L per 100 km.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Fiat Scudo klart merkbar bedre: den klarer opptil 352 km, omtrent 232 km mer enn VW Caddy Compact Van.

Motor og ytelse

Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Fiat Scudo et en smule overtak – 180 hk mot 150 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 30 hk hk.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger VW Caddy Compact Van tydelig foran – den når 186 km/h, mens Fiat Scudo stopper på 130 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 56 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Fiat Scudo drar noe kraftigere med 400 Nm mot 320 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 80 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Seter: Fiat Scudo tilbyr overbevisende flere sitteplasser – 6 mot 2.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er VW Caddy Compact Van en smule lettere – 1442 kg mot 1722 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 280 kg.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Fiat Scudo betydelig bedre – opptil 6600 L, omtrent 2900 L mer enn VW Caddy Compact Van.

I nyttelast vinner Fiat Scudo klart merkbar – 1805 kg mot 759 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 1046 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

VW Caddy Compact Van viser seg å være dominerer sammenligningen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår VW Caddy Compact Van som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 30 100
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • Motortype : Bensin, Diesel, Plug-in hybrid
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 102 - 150 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 0.5 - 6.8 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 117 - 120 km
detaljer

Fiat Scudo

Scudo er en pålitelig og romslig varebil som har blitt et populært valg blant håndverkere og bedrifter. Med sitt fleksible lasteområde og komfortable interiør, gjør den hverdagskjøringen enklere. I tillegg kombinerer Scudo moderne design med praktiske funksjoner som tilfredsstiller både profesjonelle og private brukere.

detaljer

VW Caddy Compact Van

Caddy Kompaktvan er en allsidig og romslig bil som passer perfekt for både familier og bedrifter. Med sitt moderne design og praktiske løsninger er denne modellen ideell for de som ønsker både komfort og funksjonalitet. Enten du skal på langtur eller håndtere hverdagslige oppgaver, leverer Caddy Kompaktvan en pålitelig kjøreopplevelse.

detaljer
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife @ vwpress

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Fiat Scudo
VW Caddy Compact Van
Caddy Compact Van

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
36100 - 59900 €
Pris
30100 - 49400 €
Forbruk L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L
Forbruk L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
221 - 352 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
117 - 120 km
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
19.70 kWh
co2
0 - 172 g/km
co2
11 - 154 g/km
Tankkapasitet
69 L
Tankkapasitet
50 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Varebil
Karosseri
Varebil
Seter
2 - 6
Seter
2
Dører
4
Dører
4 - 5
Egenvekt
1722 - 2260 kg
Egenvekt
1442 - 1818 kg
Bagasjerom
-
Bagasjerom
-
Lengde
4980 - 5330 mm
Lengde
4500 - 4853 mm
Bredde
1920 mm
Bredde
1855 mm
Høyde
1895 - 1935 mm
Høyde
1819 - 1823 mm
Maks bagasjerom
5300 - 6600 L
Maks bagasjerom
3100 - 3700 L
Nyttelast
840 - 1805 kg
Nyttelast
628 - 759 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Elektrisk, Diesel
Motortype
Bensin, Diesel, Plug-in hybrid
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Reduksjonsgir, Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
120 - 180 hk
Effekt hk
102 - 150 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
10.5 - 11.2 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
-
Maks hastighet
130 km/h
Maks hastighet
175 - 186 km/h
Dreiemoment
260 - 400 Nm
Dreiemoment
220 - 320 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
88 - 132 kW
Effekt kW
75 - 110 kW
Slagvolum
1499 - 2184 cm3
Slagvolum
1498 - 1968 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
A, F
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, B
Merke
Fiat
Merke
VW

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Fiat Scudo?

Modellen tilbys med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.