VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Mercedes GLB – Hvilken bil er det beste valget?

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Mazda CX-60 eller Mercedes GLB?

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Mazda CX-60 vs. Mercedes GLB: A Battle of Midsize SUVs

In the ever-evolving world of midsize SUVs, the competition is fierce. Today, we delve into a detailed comparison between two prominent contenders: the Mazda CX-60 and the Mercedes GLB. Both models boast impressive technical specifications and innovative features, making them appealing choices for discerning buyers. Let's dive into the details to see how these two stalwarts stack up against each other.

GLB @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Engine Options and Performance

The 2024 Mazda CX-60 comes with a range of engine choices including a Plugin Hybrid and a potent Diesel MHEV. It offers a diverse power spectrum, starting from 200 HP and reaching up to 327 HP. The torque ranges between 450 Nm to an impressive 550 Nm, depending on the variant. With an acceleration time from 0 to 100 km/h as fast as 5.8 seconds, the CX-60 promises a thrilling drive, with a maximum speed extending up to 219 km/h.

Meanwhile, the Mercedes GLB offers a variety of petrol and diesel engines, capable of delivering between 116 HP and 320 HP. The torque output varies from 230 Nm to 400 Nm, providing ample pulling power across different models. It can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as fast as 5.5 seconds with top speeds reaching 250 km/h, ensuring that the GLB is no slouch on the open road.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Transmission and Drive Dynamics

The Mazda CX-60 is equipped with an automatic gearbox, smoothly delivering power to either an all-wheel-drive or rear-wheel-drive system. This configuration ensures excellent traction and handling in various driving conditions.

The Mercedes GLB, on the other hand, is outfitted with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, which aids in quick and seamless gear changes. It offers the versatility of front-wheel drive or all-wheel-drive setups, catering to diverse driving preferences.

GLB @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel efficiency, the CX-60 Plugin Hybrid shines with a consumption rate as low as 1.4 L/100km and an electric range of 64 km, making it an eco-friendly choice with CO2 emissions as low as 31 g/km. Meanwhile, its diesel counterpart offers a competitive consumption range of 5 to 5.4 L/100km.

The GLB models present varied consumption rates, ranging between 5.6 and 9 L/100km, with CO2 emissions from 146 g/km to 204 g/km. Although it does not match the hybrid efficiency of the CX-60, the GLB compensates with robust performance figures.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Comfort and Practicality

Both SUVs offer seating for five, ensuring sufficient space for passengers. The trunk capacity stands at 570 liters for the CX-60, matching closely with the GLB's 565 liters, providing ample space for luggage and cargo.

Regarding dimensions, the CX-60 measures 4745 mm in length and 1890 mm in width, while the GLB is slightly shorter at around 4650 mm in length and 1850 mm in width. Both SUVs stand at a similar height, providing a commanding road presence.

GLB @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Conclusion

The choice between the Mazda CX-60 and the Mercedes GLB hinges largely on individual preferences. If you prioritize cutting-edge hybrid technology and fuel efficiency, the Mazda CX-60 emerges as a standout. However, if you seek a blend of luxury, performance, and the prestige associated with the Mercedes-Benz brand, the GLB may very well be your SUV of choice. Regardless, both models offer compelling packages that cater to a diverse array of preferences and needs in the midsize SUV market.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Mercedes GLB har et minimal prisfortrinn – den starter på 47300 €, mens Mazda CX-60 koster 48900 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 1629 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Mazda CX-60 klarer seg med 1.40 L og er dermed betydelig mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Mercedes GLB, som bruker 5.60 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 4.20 L per 100 km.

GLB @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Mazda CX-60 et minimal overtak – 327 hk mot 320 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 7 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Mercedes GLB nesten umerkelig raskere – 5.50 s mot 5.80 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.30 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Mercedes GLB noe foran – den når 250 km/h, mens Mazda CX-60 stopper på 219 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 31 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Mazda CX-60 drar klart synlig kraftigere med 550 Nm mot 400 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 150 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Familiebil eller hverdagskamerat – hvem tilbyr mest plass, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Mercedes GLB i liten grad lettere – 1640 kg mot 1890 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 250 kg.

Begge modellene har samme bagasjeromsvolum – 570 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Mercedes GLB minimal bedre – opptil 1805 L, omtrent 79 L mer enn Mazda CX-60.

I nyttelast vinner Mazda CX-60 noe – 612 kg mot 500 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 112 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Mazda CX-60 seg å være er overlegen og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 48 900
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres

Mazda CX-60

  • Motortype : Plug-in hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Firehjulsdrift, Bakhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 200 - 327 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 64 km
detaljer

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
vurder

Mazda CX-60 føles som en raffinert cruiser som blander japansk presisjon med en luksuriøs atmosfære, perfekt for den som vil ha mer enn bare transport. Interiøret er smakfullt og førerorientert, og kjøreopplevelsen er balansert og komfortabel — en SUV som leverer hverdagsglede uten å være prangende.

detaljer
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Mercedes GLB

Mercedes GLB leverer solid premiumfølelse kombinert med praktisk, kubisk form som gir overraskende god plass til både passasjerer og bagasje. Den kjører komfortabelt og tryggt på langtur, og er et smart valg for familier som vil ha luksus uten å ofre funksjonalitet — dessuten ser den nesten ut som en voksen lekebil, på den morsomme måten.

detaljer
19C0853_001 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
19C0853_003 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
19C0853_015 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
19C0853_069 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
19C0797_007 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Mazda CX-60
Mercedes GLB
CX-60
GLB

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
48900 - 66300 €
Pris
47300 - 76200 €
Forbruk L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.6 - 9 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
64 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
146 - 204 g/km
Tankkapasitet
50 - 58 L
Tankkapasitet
52 - 60 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1890 - 2055 kg
Egenvekt
1640 - 1820 kg
Bagasjerom
570 L
Bagasjerom
565 - 570 L
Lengde
4745 mm
Lengde
4634 - 4650 mm
Bredde
1890 mm
Bredde
1834 - 1850 mm
Høyde
1680 - 1688 mm
Høyde
1665 - 1692 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1726 L
Maks bagasjerom
1800 - 1805 L
Nyttelast
581 - 612 kg
Nyttelast
500 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Plug-in hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Diesel
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift, Bakhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
200 - 327 hk
Effekt hk
116 - 320 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.8 - 8.4 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.5 - 11.5 s
Maks hastighet
200 - 219 km/h
Maks hastighet
188 - 250 km/h
Dreiemoment
450 - 550 Nm
Dreiemoment
230 - 400 Nm
Antall sylindre
4 - 6
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
147 - 241 kW
Effekt kW
85 - 235 kW
Slagvolum
2488 - 3283 cm3
Slagvolum
1332 - 1991 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B, D, E
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E, F, G
Merke
Mazda
Merke
Mercedes-Benz

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Mazda CX-60?

Modellen tilbys med Firehjulsdrift eller Bakhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.