VS

Jeep Compass vs Mazda CX-30 – Hvilken bil er det beste valget?

Begge modellene har sine styrker – men hvilken passer best for deg?
Sammenlign ytelse, forbruk, pris og plass direkte: Jeep Compass eller Mazda CX-30?

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

The Jeep Compass VS Mazda CX-30: A Battle of Compact SUVs

Today’s SUV market is brimming with choices, but two models stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-30, both from the 2024 model year, compete fiercely in the compact SUV category. This article dives into a head-to-head comparison, exploring technical specifications, innovative features, and everyday usability to help you decide which one might be the perfect fit for your lifestyle.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Engine Options and Performance

The Jeep Compass offers a varied powertrain lineup, featuring both Petrol MHEV and Plugin Hybrid options. Its power output spans from 130 to 240 horsepower, depending on the variant, with torque figures peaking at 240 Nm. Models equipped with All-Wheel Drive (AWD) add versatility, suitable for off-road adventures and challenging weather conditions. Jeep's commitment to providing strong performance is further highlighted by the impressive dual-clutch and automatic transmissions available within its lineup.

The Mazda CX-30 also introduces Petrol MHEV engines but opts for a simpler approach with power outputs of either 140 or 186 horsepower. Torque figures are similarly robust at up to 240 Nm. Although it lacks a hybrid option, the CX-30 promises a natural driving experience with manual gearbox options alongside the traditional automatic transmission. Mazda’s dedication to driving pleasure is evident in their manual transmission choice, offering purists a more engaging driving experience.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

On the efficiency front, the Jeep Compass offers standout consumption figures, especially with its Plugin Hybrid variant, boasting an impressive 2 L/100 km. Furthermore, it offers an electric range of 36 km, making it a suitable option for those looking to economize on fuel and minimize emissions. For relevant CO2 emissions, the Compass holds a strong position with a low figure of 48 g/km in its plugin hybrid form.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30, while not hybrid, offers commendable fuel consumption ranging from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km. This results in CO2 emissions from 129 to 148 g/km, which align with typical non-hybrid petrol standards, placing it in CO2 efficiency classes D and E. It's a choice that serves those prioritizing straightforward petrol reliability without the added complexity of hybrid systems.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Dimensions and Practicality

When it comes to size and practicality, the Compass measures slightly larger, offering a length of 4404 mm compared to the CX-30's 4395 mm. This translates into a rear passenger space and cargo capacity of 438 to 420 liters in the Compass, while the CX-30 provides a trunk capacity between 430 to 422 liters, reflecting a well-thought-out use of space within a compact footprint.

In terms of interior tech and comfort, both SUVs seat five comfortably, albeit with different philosophies. The Compass lends itself to a sense of rugged adventure with its off-road capabilities. In contrast, the CX-30 emphasizes Mazda’s hallmark of sleek design and driver-focused interiors, offering a more urban-oriented atmosphere.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Driving Dynamics and Innovations

The Jeep Compass accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in times ranging between 10.3 to 7.3 seconds, showcasing versatility from practical to sprightly performance levels across the range. Its maximum speed spans from 183 to 200 km/h, highlighting a balance between everyday usability and highway performance.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a similar 0 to 100 km/h acceleration performance between 8.3 to 10.3 seconds. This is paired with maximum speeds reaching up to 204 km/h, displaying Mazda’s focus on providing an agile road experience rooted in their Zoom-Zoom philosophy.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Conclusion: Which SUV Is Right for You?

In selecting between the Jeep Compass and the Mazda CX-30, consider your driving preferences and lifestyle needs. If you favor hybrid efficiency, occasional off-road adventures, and diverse driving conditions, the Jeep Compass might be your best bet. However, if you lean towards a more traditional driving experience with a focus on sleek design and direct handling, the Mazda CX-30 stands out as a strong contender.

Ultimately, both SUVs represent excellent choices within the compact segment, each bringing its brand's strengths and innovations to the table. Whether trailblazing with Jeep or savoring the refined road feel of Mazda, these models serve as exemplary choices for the modern driver.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Kostnader og forbruk

Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

Mazda CX-30 har et tydelig prisfortrinn – den starter på 29400 €, mens Jeep Compass koster 39900 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 10460 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Jeep Compass klarer seg med 2 L og er dermed overbevisende mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Mazda CX-30, som bruker 5.70 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 3.70 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Motor og ytelse

Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Jeep Compass et merkbar overtak – 240 hk mot 186 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 54 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Jeep Compass noe raskere – 7.30 s mot 8.30 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Mazda CX-30 lett foran – den når 204 km/h, mens Jeep Compass stopper på 200 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 4 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Jeep Compass drar påfallende kraftigere med 345 Nm mot 240 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 105 Nm.

Compass @ media.stellantis.com

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Mazda CX-30 minimal lettere – 1455 kg mot 1575 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 120 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Jeep Compass påfallende mer plass – 550 L mot 430 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 120 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Mazda CX-30 nesten umerkelig bedre – opptil 1406 L, omtrent 19 L mer enn Jeep Compass.

I nyttelast vinner Mazda CX-30 minimal – 496 kg mot 470 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 26 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Jeep Compass seg å være vinner duellen klart og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 39 900
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28

Jeep Compass

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid, Elektrisk
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 130 - 240 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 2 - 5.9 L
  • Forbruk kWh/100km : 17.50 kWh
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 36 - 500 km
detaljer

Jeep Compass

2 (1)
vurder

Jeep Compass kombinerer robust Jeep-personlighet med moderne komfort, og føles like hjemme både i byjungelen og på lettere grusveier. Interiøret er praktisk og innbydende, og Compass er et klokt valg for de som vil ha ekte SUV-følelse uten unødig drama i hverdagen.

detaljer
02_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e929f23b1b7_61e99b0034e28 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_002 @ media.stellantis.com
04_jeeprcompassehybrid-61e80da1eca00_61e99b00bed35 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_009 @ media.stellantis.com
220315_J_Compass_e-hybrid_S_012 @ media.stellantis.com

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
vurder

Mazda CX-30 pakker et elegant utseende og en overraskende leken kjørefølelse inn i en praktisk pakke som passer like godt til bykjøring som til helgetur. Interiøret er nøye gjennomtenkt og gir deg en premiumfølelse uten å tømme sparegrisen — en smart og sjarmerende bil for den som vil ha både stil og kjøreglede.

detaljer
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Jeep Compass
Mazda CX-30
Compass
CX-30

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
39900 - 54700 €
Pris
29400 - 42900 €
Forbruk L/100km
2 - 5.9 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
17.50 kWh
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
36 - 500 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
74 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
0 - 133 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Tankkapasitet
36 - 55 L
Tankkapasitet
48 - 51 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
SUV
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1575 - 2198 kg
Egenvekt
1455 - 1587 kg
Bagasjerom
420 - 550 L
Bagasjerom
422 - 430 L
Lengde
4404 - 4552 mm
Lengde
4395 mm
Bredde
1819 mm
Bredde
1795 mm
Høyde
1629 - 1675 mm
Høyde
1540 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1230 - 1387 L
Maks bagasjerom
1398 - 1406 L
Nyttelast
465 - 470 kg
Nyttelast
458 - 496 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Plug-in hybrid, Elektrisk
Motortype
Bensin MHEV
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Automatgirkasse, Reduksjonsgir
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Effekt hk
130 - 240 hk
Effekt hk
140 - 186 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
7.3 - 10.3 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.3 - 10.3 s
Maks hastighet
180 - 200 km/h
Maks hastighet
191 - 204 km/h
Dreiemoment
230 - 345 Nm
Dreiemoment
238 - 240 Nm
Antall sylindre
4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
96 - 177 kW
Effekt kW
103 - 137 kW
Slagvolum
1199 - 1469 cm3
Slagvolum
1998 - 2488 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024 - 2025
Modellår
2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, B, A
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E
Merke
Jeep
Merke
Mazda

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech features that appeal to younger buyers. Ultimately, both models excel in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, making them top choices for families and urban dwellers alike.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Jeep Compass?

Jeep Compass er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.