VS

Ford Focus vs VW Polo – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

To biler, én duell: Ford Focus møter VW Polo.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

Focus @ focus.fordpresskits.com

Ford Focus vs VW Polo: A Comprehensive Hatchback Showdown

Welcome to this exciting comparison between two renowned hatchbacks: the Ford Focus and the VW Polo. Both models offer impressive features, performance, and innovation, but they cater to slightly different audiences. Let's dive into the technical details and innovations of these two popular vehicles and see which one stands out based on your needs.

Polo @ Volkswagen

Performance and Engine Options

The Ford Focus comes with a variety of engine options, including petrol mild hybrid (MHEV), diesel, and standard petrol engines. It offers a range of power outputs from 125 to 280 horsepower, enabling drivers to choose based on their desired driving experience. In contrast, the VW Polo is equipped with petrol engines only, providing outputs between 80 and 207 horsepower.

Focus @ focus.fordpresskits.com

Technical Specifications

Both vehicles employ front-wheel drive, but the Ford Focus offers more versatility in terms of transmission with both manual and dual-clutch automatic options. The VW Polo matches this by also providing both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions.

The Ford Focus has a slightly larger frame with its length stretching up to 4,397 mm, compared to the VW Polo's more compact 4,074 mm length. In terms of fuel economy, the Focus boasts a fuel consumption range of 4.9 to 8 L/100km, while the Polo's consumption ranges from 5.2 to 6.5 L/100km, making both relatively efficient but with the Focus offering more consumption flexibility.

Polo @ Volkswagen

Comfort and Practicality

Both models seat five passengers comfortably. The larger Ford Focus offers more trunk capacity at 392 liters, compared to the Polo's 351 liters, making the Focus a better choice for those who frequently carry more cargo. However, the Focus also weighs more, with curb weights starting from 1,330 kg to 1,529 kg, while the Polo is more lightweight with a range between 1,138 kg and 1,372 kg.

The Focus' fuel tank can hold up to 52 liters, allowing for fewer fuel stops on long journeys compared to the Polo's 40-liter capacity. The VW Polo, with its smaller stature and weight, is potentially more maneuverable in tight urban settings.

Focus @ focus.fordpresskits.com

Performance and Dynamics

The Ford Focus impresses with an acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.7 seconds in its top performance variant, whereas the Polo achieves this in 6.5 seconds when opting for its highest-spec model. Depending on the variant, the Focus maxes out between 186 and an impressive 250 km/h, compared to the Polo’s range of 171 to 240 km/h, making the Focus more appealing for speed enthusiasts.

Polo @ Volkswagen

Environmental Considerations

CO2 emissions are an important consideration for many buyers. The Ford Focus emits between 117 to 183 g/km of CO2, placing it in CO2 efficiency classes D and G. Meanwhile, the VW Polo emissions range from 118 to 149 g/km, categorized under D and E classes, making it slightly more eco-friendly overall.

Conclusion

The choice between the Ford Focus and VW Polo boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The Focus offers a wider range of powerful engine options and additional cargo space, ideal for those requiring performance and practicality. On the other hand, the Polo is more compact and efficient, perfect for urban commuting with its lightweight and smaller frame. Both models represent their respective brands exceptionally well, and either would make a valuable addition to your driveway.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Når det gjelder økonomi i bruk, ser vi interessante forskjeller mellom de to modellene.

VW Polo har et klart merkbar prisfortrinn – den starter på 19800 €, mens Ford Focus koster 32100 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 12265 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Ford Focus klarer seg med 4.90 L og er dermed knapt merkbar mer drivstofføkonomisk enn VW Polo, som bruker 5.10 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.20 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Ford Focus et merkbar overtak – 280 hk mot 207 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 73 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Ford Focus litt raskere – 5.70 s mot 6.50 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.80 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Ford Focus knapt merkbar foran – den når 250 km/h, mens VW Polo stopper på 240 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 10 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Ford Focus drar merkbar kraftigere med 420 Nm mot 320 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 100 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Utover rå ytelse teller hverdagskomfort mest. Her avgjøres det hvilken bil som er mest praktisk og allsidig.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er VW Polo noe lettere – 1143 kg mot 1330 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 187 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Ford Focus i liten grad mer plass – 392 L mot 351 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 41 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Ford Focus i liten grad bedre – opptil 1354 L, omtrent 229 L mer enn VW Polo.

I nyttelast vinner Ford Focus en smule – 560 kg mot 457 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 103 kg.

Hvem stikker av med seieren?

Alt i alt viser Ford Focus seg å være er overlegen og sikrer seg dermed tittelen som DriveDuel Champion.
Den utmerker seg med en bedre totalpakke og er den mest allsidige bilen i hverdagen.

fra ca. € 32 100
2021_FORD_FOCUS_ST-LINE_01-LOW

Ford Focus

  • Motortype : Bensin MHEV, Diesel, Bensin
  • Girkasse : Manuel, Automat
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 115 - 280 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 4.9 - 8 L
detaljer

Ford Focus

Ford Focus føles livlig og presis i svingene, med en førerorientert cockpit som gjør dagligkjøring til ren glede. Den er romslig nok for familie og handlebagasje, smart utstyrt og gir solid valuta for pengene — en praktisk bil som ikke tar seg selv for høytidelig.

detaljer
2021_FORD_FOCUS_ST-LINE_01-LOW @ focus.fordpresskits.com
2021_FORD_FOCUS_ST-LINE_02-LOW @ focus.fordpresskits.com
2021_FORD_FOCUS_ACTIVE_INTERIOR_04-LOW @ focus.fordpresskits.com

VW Polo

VW Polo er en overraskende voksen liten bil som kombinerer praktisk fornuft med tysk eleganse. Den glir greit gjennom byjungelen, gir deg god komfort på lengre turer og er et trygt valg for den som vil ha en smart hverdagsbil uten krøll.

detaljer
DB2021AU00726_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU00728_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU00732_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU00735_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU00736_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU00741_medium @ Volkswagen

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Ford Focus
VW Polo
Focus
Polo

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
32100 - 49900 €
Pris
19800 - 35500 €
Forbruk L/100km
4.9 - 8 L
Forbruk L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
117 - 183 g/km
co2
116 - 148 g/km
Tankkapasitet
52 L
Tankkapasitet
40 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Hatchback
Karosseri
Hatchback
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1330 - 1529 kg
Egenvekt
1143 - 1378 kg
Bagasjerom
392 L
Bagasjerom
351 L
Lengde
4382 - 4397 mm
Lengde
4074 mm
Bredde
1825 - 1844 mm
Bredde
1751 mm
Høyde
1438 - 1482 mm
Høyde
1431 - 1451 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1354 L
Maks bagasjerom
1125 L
Nyttelast
495 - 560 kg
Nyttelast
432 - 457 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin MHEV, Diesel, Bensin
Motortype
Bensin
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch, Automatgirkasse
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
115 - 280 hk
Effekt hk
80 - 207 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.7 - 11.8 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
6.5 - 15.6 s
Maks hastighet
186 - 250 km/h
Maks hastighet
171 - 240 km/h
Dreiemoment
170 - 420 Nm
Dreiemoment
93 - 320 Nm
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Effekt kW
85 - 206 kW
Effekt kW
59 - 152 kW
Slagvolum
999 - 2261 cm3
Slagvolum
999 - 1984 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2022 - 2024
Modellår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, G
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
D, E
Merke
Ford
Merke
VW

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hyundai Tucson
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech features that appeal to younger buyers. Ultimately, both models excel in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, making them top choices for families and urban dwellers alike.
Hvilke drivlinjer finnes for Ford Focus?

Finnes som Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.