@ Audi AG
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Audi A6 Avant vs Mazda CX-60 – Hvilken bil passer best for deg?

To biler, én duell: Audi A6 Avant møter Mazda CX-60.
Hvem imponerer mest på ytelse, forbruk og pris–ytelse? Finn ut nå!

A6 Avant @ Audi AG

The Audi A6 Avant vs. Mazda CX-60: A Wagon Takes on an SUV

The automotive world is filled with diverse choices, catering to every need and preference. In this article, we explore the Audi A6 Avant and Mazda CX-60, two vehicles from different segments— a wagon versus an SUV—but each brimming with unique features and capabilities. Whether you're inclined towards the elegance of the A6 Avant or the rugged allure of the CX-60, there's plenty to consider.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Performance & Powertrain: The Heart of the Machine

The Audi A6 Avant offers a range of powerful and efficient engines, from diesel MHEV to petrol MHEV and plug-in hybrid options. With power outputs ranging from 163 HP to a roaring 630 HP, there's a version for every driver. This flexibility is complemented by a choice of front-wheel or all-wheel drive, and a dual-clutch automatic transmission for smooth gear shifts. The standout 3.6-second acceleration (0-100 km/h) and impressive torque up to 850 Nm ensure dynamic performance.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-60, a newcomer with a sporty SUV stance, provides robust performance with options including a plug-in hybrid and diesel MHEV engines. With up to 327 HP, it achieves acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds, supported by all-wheel and rear-wheel drive systems for superior road handling. The CX-60’s highest torque sits at 550 Nm, offering ample pulling power.

A6 Avant @ Audi AG

Fuel Efficiency & Emissions: Environment Meets Economy

Efficiency is where the Audi A6 Avant shines with options like the plug-in hybrid offering a consumption as low as 1.4 L/100km and a respectable electric range of 65 km. The CO2 emissions start at 32 g/km, establishing it as a more environmentally friendly choice in certain trims. Despite its high power, it maintains an efficient balance with its fuel consumption ranging up to just 12.3 L/100km on high-performance variants.

The Mazda CX-60’s plug-in hybrid variant also achieves a remarkable 1.4 L/100km, just shy of the A6 Avant's figures, with an electric-only range of 64 km. It boasts low CO2 emissions at 32 g/km, showcasing Mazda’s commitment to eco-friendly advancements, while maintaining efficient fuel consumption at a higher 5 L/100km in larger engines.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Dimensions & Practicality: Space for the Journey

In terms of space, the Audi A6 Avant offers a luxurious cabin within its 4951 mm length, accommodating five passengers comfortably. The trunk capacity varies up to 565 liters, suited for carrying luggage on long journeys. Its payload capability reaches up to 610 kg, ensuring it can handle the demands of both family and adventure.

The Mazda CX-60 steps in as a larger vehicle courtesy of its SUV status. At 4745 mm in length, it boasts a substantial trunk space of 570 liters, perfect for those who require extra storage capacity. The payload capacity peaks at 612 kg, providing ample room for passengers and their gear, particularly appealing for larger families or outdoor enthusiasts.

A6 Avant @ Audi AG

Handling & Innovations: Drive with Purpose

Audi is synonymous with technology and refinement, and the A6 Avant is no exception. Featuring the latest driver assistance systems, the A6 Avant ensures both comfort and safety. Its innovative MMI infotainment system keeps the driver connected, while the dynamic handling makes every drive an experience.

Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 introduces Mazda’s attraction to "Jinba Ittai" philosophy—horse and rider as one. This model boasts cutting-edge driver assistance features, promising safe and intuitive handling. The interior is laden with technology like the Mazda Connect system, ensuring a seamless connection between the road and its occupants.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Verdict: Which Suits You?

The choice between the Audi A6 Avant and Mazda CX-60 boils down to personal preference and needs. If you are inclined towards refined luxury, advanced technology, and a balance of performance with efficiency, the Audi A6 Avant deserves your attention. However, if space, power, and an SUV appeal with innovative driving dynamics are paramount, then the Mazda CX-60 stands as a compelling option. The decision lies in how you envision your next journey.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

A6 Avant @ Audi AG

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er blant de viktigste faktorene ved valg av bil – og her vises ofte de store forskjellene.

Mazda CX-60 har et litt prisfortrinn – den starter på 48900 €, mens Audi A6 Avant koster 58000 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 9110 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: Mazda CX-60 klarer seg med 1.40 L og er dermed overbevisende mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Audi A6 Avant, som bruker 2.30 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.90 L per 100 km.

Når det gjelder rekkevidde, presterer Audi A6 Avant tydelig bedre: den klarer opptil 101 km, omtrent 37 km mer enn Mazda CX-60.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Motor og ytelse

Effekt, dreiemoment og akselerasjon sier mye om hvordan bilen oppfører seg i hverdagen. Her ser man hvem som leverer mest kjøreglede.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har Audi A6 Avant et en smule overtak – 367 hk mot 327 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 40 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er Audi A6 Avant klart synlig raskere – 4.70 s mot 5.80 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 1.10 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Audi A6 Avant noe foran – den når 250 km/h, mens Mazda CX-60 stopper på 219 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 31 km/h.

Dreiemomentet er identisk for begge modeller – 550 Nm.

A6 Avant @ Audi AG

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Innvendig plass, bagasjerom og lastekapasitet er avgjørende for hverdagsbruk. Her teller komfort og fleksibilitet.

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Audi A6 Avant knapt merkbar lettere – 1865 kg mot 1890 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 25 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr Mazda CX-60 litt mer plass – 570 L mot 503 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 67 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer Mazda CX-60 noe bedre – opptil 1726 L, omtrent 192 L mer enn Audi A6 Avant.

I nyttelast vinner Mazda CX-60 minimal – 612 kg mot 570 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 42 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

Mazda CX-60 viser seg å være dominerer sammenligningen og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår Mazda CX-60 som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 48 900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Motortype : Plug-in hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Girkasse : Automat
  • Drivtype : Firehjulsdrift, Bakhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 200 - 327 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Elektrisk rekkevidde : 64 km
detaljer

Audi A6 Avant

Audi A6 Avant kombinerer diskret eleganse med praktisk familiefokus, og gjør bagasjerommet til et sted du faktisk gleder deg til å bruke. Interiøret føles gjennomtenkt og kvalitetsstemt, og kjøreegenskapene gir deg trygghet på langtur — perfekt for den som vil ha både stil og fornuft uten å kjede seg.

detaljer
A1810703_overfull @ Audi AG
A1810705_overfull @ Audi AG
A1810707_overfull @ Audi AG
A1810691_overfull @ Audi AG
A1810698_overfull @ Audi AG
A1810696_overfull @ Audi AG

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
vurder

Mazda CX-60 føles som en raffinert cruiser som blander japansk presisjon med en luksuriøs atmosfære, perfekt for den som vil ha mer enn bare transport. Interiøret er smakfullt og førerorientert, og kjøreopplevelsen er balansert og komfortabel — en SUV som leverer hverdagsglede uten å være prangende.

detaljer
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Topp bilsammenligninger

@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki S-Cross
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage …
Audi A6 Avant
Mazda CX-60
A6 Avant @ Audi AG
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
58000 - 82000 €
Pris
48900 - 66300 €
Forbruk L/100km
2.3 - 7.5 L
Forbruk L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
94 - 101 km
Elektrisk rekkevidde
64 km
Batterikapasitet
20.70 kWh
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
53 - 170 g/km
co2
31 - 139 g/km
Tankkapasitet
46 - 60 L
Tankkapasitet
50 - 58 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Stasjonsvogn
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1865 - 2240 kg
Egenvekt
1890 - 2055 kg
Bagasjerom
404 - 503 L
Bagasjerom
570 L
Lengde
4999 mm
Lengde
4745 mm
Bredde
1875 mm
Bredde
1890 mm
Høyde
1472 mm
Høyde
1680 - 1688 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1423 - 1534 L
Maks bagasjerom
1726 L
Nyttelast
535 - 570 kg
Nyttelast
581 - 612 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin, Bensin MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plug-in hybrid
Motortype
Plug-in hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Girkasse
Automat
Girkasse
Automat
Gir detalj
Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift, Firehjulsdrift
Drivtype
Firehjulsdrift, Bakhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
204 - 367 hk
Effekt hk
200 - 327 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
4.7 - 8.3 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
5.8 - 8.4 s
Maks hastighet
238 - 250 km/h
Maks hastighet
200 - 219 km/h
Dreiemoment
340 - 550 Nm
Dreiemoment
450 - 550 Nm
Antall sylindre
4 - 6
Antall sylindre
4 - 6
Effekt kW
150 - 270 kW
Effekt kW
147 - 241 kW
Slagvolum
1968 - 2995 cm3
Slagvolum
2488 - 3283 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2025
Modellår
2024
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
F, D, E, B
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
B, D, E
Merke
Audi
Merke
Mazda

Lignende bilsammenligninger

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.4
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Kia Sportage emerge as standout contenders, each bringing a unique blend of style and functionality. While the Tucson boasts a sleek design and a spacious interior, the Sportage offers a more adventurous aesthetic and advanced tech …
Er Audi A6 Avant tilgjengelig med ulike drivtyper?

Audi A6 Avant er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift eller Firehjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.