VS

Kia Ceed vs MG ZS – Ytelse, rekkevidde og forbruk sammenlignet

Enten du ser etter en bil til hverdagsbruk, familie eller lange turer – her ser du forskjellene.
Finn ut om Kia Ceed eller MG ZS passer best til din livsstil.

Ceed @ press.kia.com

Dynamic Duo: Kia Ceed vs MG ZS

The automotive landscape is increasingly competitive, with manufacturers racing to incorporate cutting-edge technology and innovative designs. The Kia Ceed and the MG ZS symbolize this evolution, each offering unique attributes in their respective classes. This comparison examines the technical prowess and innovations that these models bring to the table.

ZS @ news.mgmotor.eu

Powertrains and Performance

The Kia Ceed, a hatchback, offers diverse engine choices, including petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV) options and conventional petrol engines. With power output ranging from 100 to 140 HP (74 to 103 kW), drivers can expect a dynamic driving experience. The Ceed's acceleration varies from 9.5 to 13.2 seconds for 0-100 km/h, a testament to its versatility.

On the other hand, the MG ZS positions itself as an SUV, providing options that range from electric to hybrid and traditional petrol engines. Its power spectrum extends from 116 to 197 HP (85 to 145 kW). The ZS's electric variant boasts an impressive range of up to 440 km, offering a sustainable choice for eco-conscious consumers. In terms of acceleration, the ZS can go from 0-100 km/h between 8.6 to 8.7 seconds, making it agile for an SUV.

Ceed @ press.kia.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

The Kia Ceed's fuel consumption ranges from 6 to 6.4 L/100km, reflecting its efficiency. However, it carries a CO2 efficiency class of E, with emissions between 137 to 146 g/km, suggesting opportunities for improvement in environmental impact.

Meanwhile, the MG ZS excels in fuel efficiency, particularly with its hybrid options consuming as little as 5 L/100km and electric variants consuming between 17.3 to 17.8 kWh/100km. The MG ZS offers a CO2 efficiency class ranging from A to C, with emissions varying widely, showing its adaptability to greener technology.

ZS @ news.mgmotor.eu

Interior and Cargo Space

Both vehicles accommodate five passengers comfortably. The Kia Ceed offers a trunk capacity of 357 to 395 liters, while the MG ZS leads with a more generous 443 to 448 liters. These dimensions enable both cars to cater to families and individuals with active lifestyles, providing ample cargo space.

Ceed @ press.kia.com

Size and Dimensions

The Kia Ceed measures between 4315 to 4325 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and a height ranging from 1442 to 1447 mm. This compact sizing is ideal for urban driving, offering maneuverability through tight spaces.

Conversely, the MG ZS, being an SUV, is slightly more substantial, measuring from 4323 to 4430 mm in length, 1809 to 1818 mm in width, and a height ranging from 1635 to 1649 mm. The broader stance and taller framework provide a commanding presence on the road, suitable for those who prefer a more elevated driving experience.

ZS @ news.mgmotor.eu

Choosing the Right Companion

In essence, choosing between the Kia Ceed and the MG ZS depends on individual preferences and priorities. The Kia Ceed may appeal to those seeking a versatile, fuel-efficient compact car with engaging performance. Meanwhile, the MG ZS caters to drivers who need a family-friendly SUV with innovative hybrid and electric technology.

Both models reflect their manufacturers' commitment to producing vehicles that meet varied consumer needs, offering a blend of performance, efficiency, and practicality. Whether it's the urban agility of the Ceed or the robust versatility of the ZS, each car stands as a worthy contender in today's automotive market.

Her blir det konkret: De tekniske forskjellene i detalj

Kostnader og forbruk

Pris og effektivitet er ofte områdene med de tydeligste forskjellene. Her avgjøres det ofte hvilken bil som passer best til budsjettet over tid.

MG ZS har et påfallende prisfortrinn – den starter på 21000 €, mens Kia Ceed koster 27400 €. Forskjellen er omtrent 6400 €.

Også når det gjelder drivstofforbruk, ser vi forskjeller: MG ZS klarer seg med 5 L og er dermed litt mer drivstofføkonomisk enn Kia Ceed, som bruker 6 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 1 L per 100 km.

Motor og ytelse

Under panseret ser man hvilken modell som har den mer sportslige karakteren – og hvem som akselererer best.

Når det gjelder motoreffekt, har MG ZS et klart synlig overtak – 197 hk mot 140 hk. Det tilsvarer en forskjell på omtrent 57 hk hk.

I akselerasjon fra 0 til 100 km/t er MG ZS lett raskere – 8.70 s mot 9.50 s. Forskjellen er omtrent 0.80 s sekunder.

Når det gjelder toppfart, ligger Kia Ceed minimal foran – den når 197 km/h, mens MG ZS stopper på 179 km/h. Forskjellen er omtrent 18 km/h.

Også når det gjelder dreiemoment, er det forskjeller: Kia Ceed drar klart merkbar kraftigere med 253 Nm mot 148 Nm. Forskjellen er omtrent 105 Nm.

Plass og praktiske egenskaper

Familiebil eller hverdagskamerat – hvem tilbyr mest plass, fleksibilitet og komfort?

Begge bilene har plass til 5 personer.

Når det gjelder egenvekt, er Kia Ceed knapt merkbar lettere – 1298 kg mot 1330 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 32 kg.

Når det gjelder bagasjeromsplass, tilbyr MG ZS i liten grad mer plass – 443 L mot 395 L. Forskjellen er omtrent 48 L.

Ved maksimal lastekapasitet scorer MG ZS i liten grad bedre – opptil 1457 L, omtrent 166 L mer enn Kia Ceed.

I nyttelast vinner Kia Ceed lett – 490 kg mot 470 kg. Forskjellen er omtrent 20 kg.

Hvem vinner duellen?

MG ZS viser seg å være vinner duellen klart og blir dermed vår DriveDuel Champion!
I denne sammenligningen fremstår MG ZS som den mer komplette allrounderen.

fra ca. € 21 000
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic

MG ZS

  • Motortype : Full hybrid, Bensin
  • Girkasse : Automat, Manuel
  • Drivtype : Forhjulsdrift
  • Effekt hk : 116 - 197 hk
  • Forbruk L/100km : 5 - 6.5 L
detaljer

Kia Ceed

Kia Ceed har virkelig befestet sin posisjon som en av de mest populære bilene i klassen for kompakte familiebiler. Den kombinerer moderne design med en romslig og komfortabel interiør, noe som gjør den til et utmerket valg for både bykjøring og lengre turer. Med fokus på sikkerhet og drivstoffeffektivitet, er Ceed et praktisk og stilfullt alternativ for dagens bilkjøpere.

detaljer
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_01 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Ceed_GT_Line_MJ22_02 @ press.kia.com
Kia_XCeed_MJ2023_Innen @ press.kia.com

MG ZS

5 (1)
vurder

MG ZS føles som et prisgunstig alternativ i kompakt-SUV-klassen, med en romslig kupé og moderne utstyr som gjør hverdagskjøring både praktisk og litt hyggeligere. Den kjører avslappet nok til å senke skuldrene, men appellerer først og fremst til fornuftige kjøpere som vil ha mye bil for pengene fremfor sportslige krumspring.

detaljer
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07 @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21 @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior @ news.mgmotor.eu
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Lignende bilsammenligninger

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles — while the Vitara dishes out sharper steering, bolder styling and peppier engine options for those who want a bit of fun. Choose the S‑Cross for economy and family duties; take the Vitara if you prefer personality and a small SUV that’s more adventurous than anonymous.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric SUVs, the Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Elroq stand out as formidable contenders. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, while the Elroq offers a sportier design and a more dynamic driving experience. As both models leverage Skoda's commitment to sustainability and innovation, potential buyers will have to consider their priorities when choosing between these two striking electric vehicles.
Kia Ceed
MG ZS
Ceed
ZS

Kostnader og forbruk
Pris
27400 - 30700 €
Pris
21000 - 27000 €
Forbruk L/100km
6 - 6.4 L
Forbruk L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Forbruk kWh/100km
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Elektrisk rekkevidde
-
Batterikapasitet
-
Batterikapasitet
-
co2
137 - 146 g/km
co2
113 - 145 g/km
Tankkapasitet
50 L
Tankkapasitet
41 - 55 L

Mål og karosseri
Karosseri
Hatchback
Karosseri
SUV
Seter
5
Seter
5
Dører
5
Dører
5
Egenvekt
1298 - 1372 kg
Egenvekt
1330 - 1420 kg
Bagasjerom
357 - 395 L
Bagasjerom
443 L
Lengde
4315 mm
Lengde
4430 mm
Bredde
1800 mm
Bredde
1818 mm
Høyde
1447 mm
Høyde
1635 mm
Maks bagasjerom
1253 - 1291 L
Maks bagasjerom
1457 L
Nyttelast
478 - 490 kg
Nyttelast
375 - 470 kg

Motor og ytelse
Motortype
Bensin, Bensin MHEV
Motortype
Full hybrid, Bensin
Girkasse
Manuel, Automat
Girkasse
Automat, Manuel
Gir detalj
Manuell girkasse, Automatisk dobbeltclutch
Gir detalj
Automatgirkasse, Manuell girkasse
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Drivtype
Forhjulsdrift
Effekt hk
100 - 140 hk
Effekt hk
116 - 197 hk
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
9.5 - 13.2 s
Akselerasjon 0-100km/t
8.7 - 12.5 s
Maks hastighet
178 - 197 km/h
Maks hastighet
168 - 179 km/h
Dreiemoment
172 - 253 Nm
Dreiemoment
148 Nm
Antall sylindre
3 - 4
Antall sylindre
4
Effekt kW
74 - 103 kW
Effekt kW
85 - 145 kW
Slagvolum
998 - 1482 cm3
Slagvolum
1495 - 1498 cm3

Generelt
Modellår
2024
Modellår
2024 - 2025
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
E
CO2-effektivitetsklasse
C, E
Merke
Kia
Merke
MG

Lignende bilsammenligninger

VW ID.4
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the VW ID.4 and Skoda Enyaq offer distinctive features that cater to different preferences. The ID.4 boasts a more refined interior and advanced tech options, while the Enyaq shines with its spaciousness and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two electrifying rivals comes down to personal priorities, whether it's premium driving experience or superior cargo capacity.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the dynamic showdown between the CUPRA Formentor and the CUPRA Terramar, enthusiasts are treated to a blend of style and performance that defines the brand. The Formentor, with its striking design and agile handling, appeals to those seeking a sportier SUV experience, while the Terramar offers a more robust package with advanced technology and spaciousness for families on the go. Ultimately, both models showcase CUPRA's commitment to delivering exhilarating drives, making the choice a thrilling dilemma for buyers.
Lexus LBX
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
Think of the Lexus LBX and Toyota Yaris Cross as sibling rivals: they share the same hybrid bones, but the LBX wraps them in sharper styling, quieter materials and a premium badge that commands a higher price for finesse. If you crave Lexus polish and cabin calm, go LBX; if you want smart practicality, better value and fewer awkward conversations about leather upkeep, the Yaris Cross is the savvier buy.
Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit of the Jogger’s economy for extra comfort and on-the-road confidence. Pick the Jogger if you want maximum value and seating, choose the Bigster if you crave more space, style and a bolder look for a few extra quid.
Renault Austral
Renault Rafale
VS
Between the Renault Austral and the Renault Rafale, the Austral is the practical, family-focused SUV that prioritises comfort, space and everyday usability, while the Rafale leans into coupe‑SUV styling and a sharper, more dynamic driving character. Choose the Austral for sensible value and room for all the shopping bags; pick the Rafale if you want something that looks sportier and turns heads — at a slightly higher price for the thrills.
Toyota Yaris Cross
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the battle of compact versatility, the Toyota Yaris Cross takes the lead with its SUV-inspired design and elevated stance, catering to drivers who prioritize a raised driving position and additional space. Meanwhile, the traditional Toyota Yaris remains a favorite for urban dwellers, excelling in fuel efficiency and maneuverability in tight city streets. With advancements in technology and safety features across both models, prospective buyers are presented with compelling options that suit a variety of lifestyles.
Hvilke drivverksalternativer tilbyr Kia Ceed?

Kia Ceed er tilgjengelig med Forhjulsdrift.

De viste prisene og dataene er estimater basert på tyske listepriser og kan variere avhengig av land. Denne informasjonen er ikke juridisk bindende.