Jeep Compass vs MG ZS – Forskjeller og priser sammenlignet

Battle of the SUVs: Jeep Compass vs. MG ZS

In a rapidly evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs have become increasingly popular due to their blend of practicality, style, and capability. This time, we pit the Jeep Compass against the MG ZS, two contenders that offer distinct features and technological innovations aimed at capturing the SUV market.

Design and Dimensions

The Jeep Compass is a modern embodiment of the classic SUV form, showcasing its renowned rugged aesthetics. The Compass stands tall, measuring 4404 mm in length, 1819 mm in width, and offers a height variance between 1629 mm and 1649 mm. The robust frame is complemented by a spacious trunk offering between 420 and 438 liters of cargo space, making it an ideal choice for the adventurous family-oriented buyer.

On the other hand, the MG ZS, with its sleek profile, pushes the envelope of urban SUV design. This model offers a length of 4430 mm and a slight width of 1818 mm, with a comparable height of 1649 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly more generous, ranging from 443 to 448 liters, appealing to those who prioritize storage space without sacrificing aesthetics.

Power and Performance

The Jeep Compass presents a versatile engine lineup, including petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicles (MHEV) and plug-in hybrids, delivering power outputs ranging from 130 HP to 240 HP. Acceleration figures vary from a modest 10.3 seconds to an impressive 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h, paired with top speeds reaching up to 200 km/h. Whether opting for front-wheel or all-wheel drive, the Compass offers a drive that can transition from urban streets to rugged terrains effortlessly.

The MG ZS, available in electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants, offers a performance spectrum tailored for eco-conscious drivers. With power outputs from 116 HP to 197 HP and a torque of 280 Nm, the ZS accomplishes 0-100 km/h in approximately 8.6 to 8.7 seconds. The model shines with its electric variant, boasting a significant range of up to 440 km, which serves avid long-distance travelers who prioritize sustainability without compromising on power.

Efficiency and Sustainability

Emphasizing eco-credentials, the Jeep Compass plug-in hybrid models showcase CO2 emissions starting from just 48 g/km, commanding attention with a CO2 efficiency class as high as B. The Compass also provides a practical hybrid consumption rate ranging from 2 to 5.5 L/100km, balancing performance with fuel conservation.

Aligning with global sustainability trends, the MG ZS electric model takes the spotlight with zero tailpipe emissions, underpinning its A-Class CO2 efficiency. Furthermore, with a consumption rate as low as 17.3 kWh/100km for its electric version and up to 6.5 L/100km for petrol, the ZS poses a formidable choice for the eco-conscious driver.

Technology and Innovations

Jeep equips the Compass with numerous technological advancements, including dual-clutch automatic transmissions and intelligent all-wheel drive systems designed for a seamless driving experience across diverse terrains.

In contrast, the MG ZS capitalizes on modern-day connectivity and smarter driving solutions, integrating advanced infotainment systems and driver-assistance technologies, appealing especially to tech-savvy users seeking a dynamic yet connected driving experience.

Conclusion

The choice between the Jeep Compass and the MG ZS ultimately rests on buyer priorities. The Compass impresses with its off-road capabilities and hybrid technology, appealing to the adventurous and versatile drivers. Conversely, the MG ZS stands out with strong electric options and stylish city-friendly design, attracting those who lean towards sustainable technology and everyday practicality. Both models hold their ground firmly in the competitive SUV market, offering commendable features tailored to varied tastes and requirements.